Kelly A Romano1,2, Kristin E Heron3,4, Robin S Everhart5. 1. The Virginia Consortium Program in Clinical Psychology, 555 Park Avenue, Norfolk, VA, 23504, USA. kroma001@odu.edu. 2. Old Dominion University, 250 Mills Godwin Building, Norfolk, VA, 23529, USA. kroma001@odu.edu. 3. The Virginia Consortium Program in Clinical Psychology, 555 Park Avenue, Norfolk, VA, 23504, USA. 4. Old Dominion University, 250 Mills Godwin Building, Norfolk, VA, 23529, USA. 5. Virginia Commonwealth University, 808 West Franklin Street, Richmond, VA, 23284, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The present study aimed to extend existing research by examining adolescent-parent dyadic associations among adaptive and maladaptive family meal characteristics, positive and negative emotion suppression, and emotional eating. METHOD: Participants included a community-based sample of adolescents and parents (N = 1646 dyads) who participated in the National Cancer Institute's Family Life, Activity, Sun, Health, and Eating Study. Dyad members both completed measures assessing family meal characteristics (family meal importance beliefs, family mealtime television watching), emotion suppression, and emotional eating via online surveys. Actor-partner interdependence models were used to examine dyadic associations among the assessed family meal characteristics, positive and negative emotion suppression, and emotional eating. RESULTS: Multiple within-person (e.g., adolescent-adolescent, parent-parent), cross-dyad member (e.g., adolescent-parent, parent-adolescent), and divergent adolescent versus parent dyadic effects were identified that differed based on the extent to which participants suppressed positive versus negative affect. For example, whereas adolescents' stronger beliefs in the importance of frequent family meals were associated with lower levels of their own suppression of positive emotions and, in turn, lower levels of both their own and their parents' emotional eating, these mediational associations were only identified at the within-person (not cross-dyad member) level among parents. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, these findings attest to the complexity of associations among the assessed risk and protective family meal characteristics, the suppression of differentially valenced emotions, and emotional eating that manifest at the adolescent-parent dyadic level. Findings also support the continued use of a family-based perspective to further the understanding of factors that are associated with emotional eating. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, cross-sectional descriptive study.
PURPOSE: The present study aimed to extend existing research by examining adolescent-parent dyadic associations among adaptive and maladaptive family meal characteristics, positive and negative emotion suppression, and emotional eating. METHOD: Participants included a community-based sample of adolescents and parents (N = 1646 dyads) who participated in the National Cancer Institute's Family Life, Activity, Sun, Health, and Eating Study. Dyad members both completed measures assessing family meal characteristics (family meal importance beliefs, family mealtime television watching), emotion suppression, and emotional eating via online surveys. Actor-partner interdependence models were used to examine dyadic associations among the assessed family meal characteristics, positive and negative emotion suppression, and emotional eating. RESULTS: Multiple within-person (e.g., adolescent-adolescent, parent-parent), cross-dyad member (e.g., adolescent-parent, parent-adolescent), and divergent adolescent versus parent dyadic effects were identified that differed based on the extent to which participants suppressed positive versus negative affect. For example, whereas adolescents' stronger beliefs in the importance of frequent family meals were associated with lower levels of their own suppression of positive emotions and, in turn, lower levels of both their own and their parents' emotional eating, these mediational associations were only identified at the within-person (not cross-dyad member) level among parents. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, these findings attest to the complexity of associations among the assessed risk and protective family meal characteristics, the suppression of differentially valenced emotions, and emotional eating that manifest at the adolescent-parent dyadic level. Findings also support the continued use of a family-based perspective to further the understanding of factors that are associated with emotional eating. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, cross-sectional descriptive study.
Authors: Jerica M Berge; Richard F MacLehose; Katie A Loth; Marla E Eisenberg; Jayne A Fulkerson; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer Journal: Appetite Date: 2012-03-14 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Jennifer Utter; Simon Denny; Roshini Peiris-John; Emma Moselen; Ben Dyson; Terryann Clark Journal: J Nutr Educ Behav Date: 2016-10-26 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: Shannon M Robson; Mary Beth McCullough; Samantha Rex; Marcus R Munafò; Gemma Taylor Journal: J Nutr Educ Behav Date: 2020-01-23 Impact factor: 3.045