Amanda C Trofholz1, Allan D Tate2, Michael H Miner3, Jerica M Berge3. 1. Division of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA. Electronic address: trofh002@umn.edu. 2. Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA. 3. Division of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Research on family meals has demonstrated that family meals are protective for many aspects of child and adolescent health. It is unclear whether distractions at family meals, such as watching TV, are associated with child weight and weight-related behaviors, the emotional atmosphere at the meal, or family meal healthfulness. METHODS: Direct observational and objective data were collected on primarily low-income and minority families (n = 120) with 6-12 year old children. Data were collected during home visits and included 24-hr dietary recalls, anthropometry, and video-recorded family meals. Video-recorded family meals were coded to assess the presence of TV, whether the family was paying attention to the TV, family group enjoyment and the dietary healthfulness of the foods served at family meals. RESULTS: The presence of TV was negatively associated with the dietary healthfulness and emotional atmosphere of the meal and the child's overall dietary quality. It was positively associated with serving fast food for family meals. Those families who were paying attention to the TV had significantly worse meal dietary healthfulness and were more likely to have fast food at family meals compared to those who were not paying attention. No significant findings were found between the presence of TV at family meals and child overweight status. CONCLUSIONS: Study results show that TV is frequently present at family meals. Even if families are not paying attention to the TV, it appears that simply having the TV on as background noise is associated with deleterious outcomes. In addition to increasing family meals, families should be given guidance on turning off the TV and making the family meal a time to connect with one another. Copyright Â
BACKGROUND: Research on family meals has demonstrated that family meals are protective for many aspects of child and adolescent health. It is unclear whether distractions at family meals, such as watching TV, are associated with child weight and weight-related behaviors, the emotional atmosphere at the meal, or family meal healthfulness. METHODS: Direct observational and objective data were collected on primarily low-income and minority families (n = 120) with 6-12 year old children. Data were collected during home visits and included 24-hr dietary recalls, anthropometry, and video-recorded family meals. Video-recorded family meals were coded to assess the presence of TV, whether the family was paying attention to the TV, family group enjoyment and the dietary healthfulness of the foods served at family meals. RESULTS: The presence of TV was negatively associated with the dietary healthfulness and emotional atmosphere of the meal and the child's overall dietary quality. It was positively associated with serving fast food for family meals. Those families who were paying attention to the TV had significantly worse meal dietary healthfulness and were more likely to have fast food at family meals compared to those who were not paying attention. No significant findings were found between the presence of TV at family meals and child overweight status. CONCLUSIONS: Study results show that TV is frequently present at family meals. Even if families are not paying attention to the TV, it appears that simply having the TV on as background noise is associated with deleterious outcomes. In addition to increasing family meals, families should be given guidance on turning off the TV and making the family meal a time to connect with one another. Copyright Â
Authors: Amanda C Trofholz; Allan D Tate; Michelle L Draxten; Seth S Rowley; Anna K Schulte; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer; Richard F MacLehose; Jerica M Berge Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Meaghan S Christian; Charlotte E L Evans; Neil Hancock; Camilla Nykjaer; Janet E Cade Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2012-12-19 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Eva Roos; Tuuli Pajunen; Carola Ray; Christel Lynch; Asa Gudrun Kristiansdottir; Thorhallur I Halldorsson; Inga Thorsdottir; Saskia J Te Velde; Michael Krawinkel; Isabel Behrendt; Maria Daniel Vaz de Almeida; Bela Franchini; Angeliki Papadaki; Joanna Moschandreas; Cirila Hlastan Ribič; Stefka Petrova; Vesselka Duleva; Irena Simčič; Agneta Yngve Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2014-03-19 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Melissa L Jensen; Francesca R Dillman Carpentier; Camila Corvalán; Barry M Popkin; Kelly R Evenson; Linda Adair; Lindsey Smith Taillie Journal: Appetite Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Amanda C Trofholz; Allan Tate; Helen Keithahn; Junia N de Brito; Katie Loth; Angela Fertig; Jerica M Berge Journal: Appetite Date: 2020-10-11 Impact factor: 3.868