| Literature DB >> 34466192 |
Athena Sharifi Razavi1, Narges Karimi2, Fatemeh Bashiri3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a prominent compressive neuropathy. There are a number of risk factors for creating CTS but the effect of these factors on the severity of CTS is unclear. In this study, we aimed to assess the correlation of serum lipid profile and obesity with the severity of CTS.Entities:
Keywords: Serum lipids; carpal tunnel syndrome; electrophysiology; obesity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34466192 PMCID: PMC8379403 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2021.39.90.27234
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pan Afr Med J
Figure 1clow chart of study population according to the STROBE-recommendations; from the initially included 137 patients, 29 were excluded from further analysis because of not participating in the study and not doing profile lipid test
the association of demographic findings and serum lipid profile
| Total Cholesterol (mg/dL) | Triglyceride(mg/dL) | LDL-C(mg/dL) | HDL-C (mg/dL) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables (n) | Normal (59) | Abnormal (49) | P-value* | Normal (48) | Abnormal (60) | P-value* | Normal (74) | Abnormal (34) | P-value* | Normal (80) | Abnormal (28) | P-value* |
|
| 44.23±8.63 | 45.05±8.36 | 0.60 | 43.93±9.12 | 45.16±7.95 | 0.45 | 43.12±8.12 | 47.86±8.34 | 0.012 | 44.87±8.54 | 43.20±8.04 | 0.35 |
|
| 0.33 | 0.19 | 0.25 | 0.10 | ||||||||
| Male | 9 (56.2) | 7(43.8) | 5 (31.3) | 11(68.7) | 13(81.3) | 3(18.7) | 12(75) | 4(25.0) | ||||
| Female | 50 (54.3) | 42(45.7) | 43(46.7) | 49(53.3) | 61(67.0) | 30 (33.0) | 68 (74.7) | 24(25.3) | ||||
|
| 0.26 | 0.024 | 0.44 | 0.48 | ||||||||
| < 30 kg/m2 | 23(50.0) | 23 (50.0) | 26 (65.2) | 20 (43.5) | 31(56.2) | 15(32.6) | 35 (76.1) | 11(23.9) | ||||
| ≥ 30 kg/m2 | 36 (57.1) | 26 (41.9) | 22 (35.5) | 40 (64.5) | 43 (70.5) | 19 (29.5) | 46 (74.2) | 16(25.8) | ||||
| Bilateral CTS, n(%) | 23 (48.9) | 24(51.1) | 0.27 | 19 (40.4) | 28 (59.6) | 0.14 | 34(72.3) | 13(27.7) | 0.35 | 33(70.2) | 14(20.8) | 0.59 |
The threshold for statistical significance was p<0.05. LDL-C: low density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL C: high density lipoprotein cholesterol.
the comparison of normal and abnormal lipid profile with the mean of symptoms severity and functional status scale according to BCTQ
| Lipid profiles (Mg/dl) | Symptoms severity scale (mean±SD) | *p value | Functional status scale (mean±SD) | *p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.68 | 0.79 | ||
| <200 | 33.33±7.80 | 23.89±7.35 | ||
| ≥200 | 33.98±7.26 | 24.29±7.63 | ||
|
| 0.55 | 0.43 | ||
| <150 | 33.14±7.02 | 23.50±7.67 | ||
| ≥150 | 34.05±8.73 | 24.53±7.31 | ||
|
| 0.38 | 0.35 | ||
| <130 | 32.91±8.71 | 23.43±7.41 | ||
| ≥130 | 34.40±8.05 | 24.93±6.97 | ||
|
| 0.81 | 0.27 | ||
| <60 | 33.16±8.71 | 23.04±7.32 | ||
| ≥60 | 33.52±6.98 | 24.68 ±7.51 |
LP: lipoprotein; *The threshold for statistical significance was p<0.05.
the relationship of serum lipid profiles with electrophysiological findings
| Lipid profiles (Mg/dl) | SNAP(mean±SD) | CMAP (mean±SD) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PL (ms) | A (µv) | CV (m/s) | DL (ms) | A (mv) | CV (m/s) | |
|
| ||||||
| <200 | 6.49±2.66 | 17.18±13.47 | 27.68±11.39 | 6.21±1.70 | 10.69±5.26 | 53.57±7.69 |
| ≥200 | 6.99±3.00 | 13.09±11.73 | 26.01±12.16 | 6.30±1.67 | 11.22±5.45 | 53.04±9.37 |
| *p-value | 0.37 | 0.09 | 0.46 | 0.80 | 0.61 | 0.74 |
|
| ||||||
| <150 | 6.31±2.66 | 17.10 ±13.60 | 28.98±11.60 | 6.16±1.87 | 10.29±4.80 | 54.10±8.98 |
| ≥150 | 7.04 ±2.92 | 13.91±12.09 | 25.28±11.65 | 6.32±1.52 | 11.45±5.70 | 52.72±8.06 |
| *p-value | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.10 | 0.63 | 0.26 | 0.39 |
|
| ||||||
| <130 | 6.61±2.79 | 16.26±13.02 | 27.24±11.69 | 6.22±1.67 | 10.57±5.06 | 53.11±7.52 |
| ≥130 | 6.82±2.87 | 13.62±12.26 | 26.47±11.81 | 6.17±1.49 | 11.98±5.76 | 53.92 ±10.46 |
| *p-value | 0.72 | 0.32 | 0.82 | 0.88 | 0.20 | 0.65 |
|
| ||||||
| <60 | 6.56±2.74 | 15.41 ±12.81 | 26.24±11.25 | 6.32±1.37 | 11.00±6.98 | 51.10±9.20 |
| ≥60 | 6.72±2.84 | 15.49 ±12.60 | 27.36±11.87 | 6.17±1.07 | 11.00±4.65 | 53.10±8.30 |
| *p-value | 0.80 | 0.97 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.99 | 0.29 |
LP: lipoprotein; SNAP: sensory nerve action potentials; PL: peak latency; A: amplitude; CV: conduction velocity; CMAP: median nerve compound muscle action potential; DL: distal latency. *The threshold for statistical significance was p<0.05.
Figure 2comparison of serum level of lipids with electro-diagnostic grading of CTS, [total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)]