Association Between Anion Gap and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with Cardiogenic Shock.

BACKGROUND: No epidemiological study has determined the association between the anion gap (AG) and all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). This study was conducted to clarify the relationship between the AG and mortality in CS.
METHODS: We extracted clinical data from the public database, MIMIC-III V1.4, by using a generalized additive model to identify the nonlinear relationship between the AG and the 30-day mortality in 1248 intensive care unit patients. Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the association between the AG and the 30-day, 90-day, and 365-day mortality in CS.
RESULTS: The AG and 30-day all-cause mortality showed a nonlinear relationship, indicated by a J-shaped curve. In the multivariate analysis, after adjusting for potential confounders, a high AG was associated with an increased risk of 30-day, 90-day, and 365-day all-cause mortality in patients with CS compared with patients who had low AG (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.62 [1.14-2.30]; 1.35 [1.04-1.84]; and 1.38 [1.03-1.84], respectively). Similar results were shown in Model I (adjusted for age, sex and ethnicity) and in Model II (fully adjusting for age, ethnicity, sex, acute kidney injury stage, CHF, renal disease, stroke, malignancy, respiratory failure, pneumonia, sodium, potassium, chloride, BUN, PT, WBC, pH, creatinine, albumin, glucose, bicarbonate, vasopressor use, diastolic blood pressure, respiration rate, temperature, the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, SOFA score and SAPSII score).
CONCLUSION: The relationship between the AG and 30-day all-cause mortality followed a J-shaped curve. Higher AG was associated with an increased risk of 30-day, 90-day, and 365-day all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with CS.

Introduction

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a clinical condition that is characterized by systemic hypotension and hypoperfusion due to insufficient cardiac output that eventually leads to multiorgan failure; CS carries risks of high morbidity and high mortality.1 Acute myocardial infarction (MI) is the commonest cause of CS, and acute ischemic CS has a more than 50% in-hospital mortality rate.2 Moreover, CS can occur as an acute manifestation of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy or as a result of severe decompensation in chronic cardiomyopathy, although these are the less frequent causes.3 Given the poor prognosis of CS in critically ill patients, researchers have sought a simple and reliable prognostic biomarker.4–6 However, these biomarkers have not been widely applied in clinical practice.

The serum anion gap (AG) is caused by the excessive production of organic acid anions and/or a proportional decrease in anion excretion.7 The AG is a mathematically derived parameter that can potentially be applied in the diagnosis of various metabolic acidosis.8 Previous studies have demonstrated that the AG is associated with mortality in several diseases, including sepsis,9 aortic aneurysm,10 coronary artery disease (CAD),11 acute myocardial infarction (AMI),12 chronic kidney disease (CKD),13 and the intensive care unit (ICU).14,15 Furthermore, a study has reported the prognostic value of the AG in the patient of CS requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support.16 But no epidemiological study has explored the association between the AG and the all-cause mortality in all critically ill patients with CS. Therefore, in this study, we analyzed the data from a public clinical database with an aim to clarify the relationship between the AG and the mortality in CS.

Methods

Data Source

We used data from the Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care III version 1.4 (MIMIC-III v1.4), a public clinical critical care database.17 The database contains comprehensive, time-stamped information for more than 60,000 ICU patients (medical, surgical, coronary care and neonatal) admitted to Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA, USA) from June 1st 2001 to October 31st 2012 (single center). The data include patient demographics; dates of hospital admission, discharge, and death (in or out of the hospital); International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9) codes; physiological indices; medications; laboratory tests; chemistry; hematology; imaging; fluid balance; and others. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA) and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Cambridge, MA); a waiver of informed consent was granted.

Population-Selection Criteria

The inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years; CS, diagnosed using the ICD-9 code at the first ICU admission; and hospitalization in the ICU for more than 2 days. The exclusion criteria were: (1) missing data on the AG at the time of ICU admission, and (2) re-admission to the ICU.

Data Extraction

Structured Query Language (SQL) with PostgreSQL (version 9.6) was used to extract data on clinical parameters, including demographics, vital signs, laboratory tests, comorbidities, scoring systems, etc., within the first 24 h after the ICU admission. The comorbidities that were extracted included CAD, congestive heart failure (CHF), atrial fibrillation (AFIB), stroke, renal disease, liver disease, pneumonia, malignancy, respiratory failure, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The laboratory tests included the levels of AG, albumin, bicarbonate, bilirubin, creatinine, chloride, glucose, hematocrit, hemoglobin, platelet, sodium, potassium, lactate, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), white blood cell (WBC), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and the international normalized ratio (INR).

Furthermore, the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score18 and the Simplified Acute Physiology Scores II (SAPSII)19 were obtained. In addition, we extracted data on age, sex, ethnicity, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean blood pressure (MBP), heart rate, respiratory rate, temperature, and SPO2, renal replacement therapy (RRT), vasopressor use, and the length of stay in the ICU as well as in the hospital. Information on the survival status was obtained from the Social Security Death Index records. The endpoints of our study were the 30-day, 90-day, and 365-day all-cause mortality from the date of ICU admission.

Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or the median and interquartile range (IQR). Categorical data are summarized as frequencies or percentages. We used the chi-square, one-way ANOVA, and Kruskal–Wallis H-tests to determine significant differences between the means and proportions among the study groups. We used a generalized additive model to identify the non-linear relationship between the AG and the 30-day mortality. In addition, we used Cox proportional hazards models to assess the association between the AG and the 30-day, 90-day, and 365-day mortality in CS, and presented the results from the unadjusted, minimally adjusted, and fully adjusted analyses. The results are presented as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Basic characteristics of population (age, sex and ethnicity) were chosen as minimally adjusted confounders. Fully adjusted confounders were be selected based on a more than 10% change in the effect estimate.20 Subgroup analysis of the associations between the AG and the 30-day all-cause mortality was performed using stratified linear regression models. The modifications and interactions of the subgroups were analyzed using likelihood ratio tests. All probability values were two-sided, and values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. R () and EmpowerStats (, X&Y solutions, Inc, Boston, MA) were used for all statistical analyses.

Results

Characteristics of Participants

A total of 1248 ICU patients met the inclusion criteria. The baseline characteristics of the participants are summarized in Table 1; participants were grouped into quartiles by the AG. The participants of this study were generally older, mostly male, White patients. In the study subgroup with a higher AG (Q4), the patients were more likely to have hypotension, and to report a comorbidity of renal disease, with significantly higher values for the heart rate, creatinine, glucose, hematocrit, potassium, lactate, BUN, WBC, PT, APTT, INR, SOFA, SAPSII, renal replacement therapy, vasopressor use, and mortality.

Table 1

Baseline Characteristics of the Study Patients According to Anion Gap (N =1248)

Characteristic	Anion Gap, mmol/L				P value
	Q1 (<12)	Q2 (≥12-<14)	Q3 (≥14-<17)	Q4(≥17)
Age, years	71.4 ± 12.7	70.4 ± 13.1	69.7 ± 14.4	72.1 ± 14.4	0.050
Gender, n (%)					0.751
Female	90 (41.9)	114 (39.3)	159 (39.8)	148 (43.0)
Male	125 (58.1)	176 (60.7)	240 (60.2)	196 (57.0)
Ethnicity, n (%)					0.664
White	151 (70.2)	203 (70.0)	275 (68.9)	226 (65.7)
Black	17 (7.9)	17 (5.9)	28 (7.0)	21 (6.1)
Other	47 (21.9)	70 (24.1)	96 (24.1)	97 (28.2)
SBP, mmHg	106.1 ± 11.7	104.5 ± 12.3	104.6 ± 13.4	100.3 ± 14.9	<0.001
DBP, mmHg	56.7 ± 9.3	58.0 ± 10.2	57.9 ± 9.9	55.7 ± 10.6	<0.001
MBP, mmHg	73.2 ± 7.9	74.2 ± 9.4	74.2 ± 9.8	70.7 ± 11.2	0.029
Heart rate, beats/minute	88.1 ± 15.6	88.0 ± 16.9	90.5 ± 17.4	90.4 ± 17.6	0.073
Respiratory rate, beats/minute	19.1 ± 3.8	19.7 ± 4.1	20.4 ± 4.1	20.9 ± 4.3	<0.001
Temperature, °C	36.7 ± 0.7	36.8 ± 0.8	36.8 ± 0.9	36.5 ± 1.0	<0.001
SPO2, %	97.1 ± 3.8	97.1 ± 2.5	96.7 ± 3.2	94.7 ± 7.1	<0.001
Comorbidities, n (%)
Coronary artery disease	134 (62.3)	172 (59.3)	230 (57.6)	169 (49.1)	0.008
Congestive heart failure	96 (44.7)	119 (41.0)	169 (42.4)	143 (41.6)	0.861
Atrial fibrillation	97 (45.1)	149 (51.4)	174 (43.6)	168 (48.8)	0.184
Stroke	14 (6.5)	16 (5.5)	19 (4.8)	14 (4.1)	0.604
Renal disease	41 (19.1)	46 (15.9)	81 (20.3)	108 (31.4)	<0.001
Liver disease	7 (3.3)	11 (3.8)	10 (2.5)	10 (2.9)	0.802
Pneumonia	76 (35.3)	92 (31.7)	136 (34.1)	99 (28.8)	0.322
Malignancy	29 (13.5)	34 (11.7)	37 (9.3)	37 (10.8)	0.431
Respiratory failure	108 (50.2)	143 (49.3)	209 (52.4)	153 (44.5)	0.189
ARDS	3 (1.4)	5 (1.7)	11 (2.8)	4 (1.2)	0.394
Laboratory parameters
Anion gap, mmol/L	10.1 ± 1.2	12.6 ± 0.5	14.9 ± 0.8	19.9 ± 3.6	<0.001
Albumin, g/dL	3.0 ± 0.7	3.0 ± 0.7	3.1 ± 0.6	3.2 ± 0.6	0.009
Bicarbonate, mg/dL	21.9 ± 5.2	20.8 ± 4.9	19.8 ± 4.4	16.8 ± 4.9	<0.001
Bilirubin, mg/dL	1.4 ± 2.6	1.1 ± 1.2	0.9 ± 1.8	1.4 ± 2.9	<0.001
Creatinine, mEq/L	1.1 ± 0.6	1.2 ± 0.7	1.6 ± 1.0	2.8 ± 2.1	<0.001
Chloride, mmol/L	102.9 ± 6.6	102.6 ± 5.4	101.2 ± 6.1	99.3 ± 6.3	<0.001
Glucose, mg/dL	105.8 ± 32.9	118.2 ± 42.6	127.8 ± 49.1	133.9 ± 70.0	<0.001
Hematocrit, %	28.1 ± 6.2	29.4 ± 6.1	30.9 ± 6.5	30.3 ± 6.7	<0.001
Hemoglobin, g/dL	9.4 ± 2.0	10.0 ± 2.2	10.4 ± 2.3	10.0 ± 2.2	<0.001
Platelet, 109 /L	173.3 ± 82.9	188.7 ± 104.8	214.2 ± 107.1	208.7 ± 113.1	<0.001
Sodium, mmol/L	135.8 ± 4.6	135.6 ± 4.6	135.1 ± 5.3	134.4 ± 5.2	0.007
Potassium, mmol/L	3.6 ± 0.5	3.7 ± 0.5	3.8 ± 0.6	4.0 ± 0.7	<0.001
Lactate, mmol/L	1.7 ± 1.2	2.0 ± 1.4	2.1 ± 1.3	3.6 ± 2.8	<0.001
BUN, mg/dL	24.0 ± 13.8	25.6 ± 14.0	34.6 ± 21.4	48.8 ± 28.1	<0.001
WBC, 109 /L	10.6 ± 11.0	10.7 ± 4.7	12.0 ± 5.2	12.8 ± 6.6	<0.001
PT, second	15.5 ± 4.9	15.8 ± 7.6	15.7 ± 5.4	18.3 ± 9.4	<0.001
APTT, second	36.0 ± 16.9	37.7 ± 18.7	38.4 ± 19.1	44.7 ± 27.5	<0.001
INR	1.4 ± 0.6	1.5 ± 1.0	1.5 ± 0.6	2.0 ± 1.8	<0.001
Scoring systems
SOFA	6.5 ± 3.4	6.2 ± 3.6	6.5 ± 3.4	8.7 ± 3.6	<0.001
SAPSII	43.8 ± 12.4	43.5 ± 14.9	45.4 ± 14.3	55.2 ± 15.1	<0.001
AKI stage, n (%)					<0.001
Stage 1	41 (19.1)	34 (11.7)	48 (12.1)	44 (12.8)
Stage 2	53 (24.7)	69 (23.8)	76 (19.1)	34 (9.9)
Stage 3	113 (52.6)	162 (55.9)	253 (63.6)	242 (70.3)
Renal replacement therapy, n (%)	23 (10.7)	27 (9.3)	59 (14.8)	94 (27.3)	<0.001
Vasopressor use, n (%)	167 (77.7)	235 (81.0)	321 (80.5)	293 (85.2)	0.140
ICU LOS, day	8.3 ± 9.2	7.7 ± 7.9	8.4 ± 8.8	7.3 ± 12.2	<0.001
Hospital LOS, day	15.5 ± 12.9	15.4 ± 16.7	15.3 ± 13.6	12.6 ± 17.0	<0.001
30-day mortality, n (%)	65 (30.2)	82 (28.3)	143 (35.8)	223 (64.8)	<0.001
90-day mortality, n (%)	95 (44.2)	106 (36.6)	175 (43.9)	242 (70.3)	<0.001
365-day mortality, n (%)	106 (49.3)	138 (47.6)	198 (49.6)	265 (77.0)	<0.001

Abbreviations: SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; MBP, mean blood pressure; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; WBC, white blood cell; PT, prothrombin time; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; INR, international normalized ratio; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; SAPSII, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II; AKI, acute kidney injury; ICU, intensive care unit; LOS, length of stay.

Relationship Between the AG and Mortality

We found that the relationship between the AG and the 30-day all-cause mortality was non-linear, as shown by a J-shaped curve (Figure 1). To further evaluate the associations between the AG and the 30-day, 90-day, and 365-day all-cause mortality in patients with CS, a Cox proportional hazards regression model was used. We stratified the AG by quartiles and have shown the adjusted models in Table 2. In Model I (adjusted for age, sex, and ethnicity), a higher AG was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality. After fully adjusting for age, ethnicity, sex, acute kidney injury stage, CHF, renal disease, stroke, malignancy, respiratory failure, pneumonia, sodium, potassium, chloride, BUN, PT, WBC, pH, creatinine, albumin, glucose, bicarbonate, vasopressor use, diastolic blood pressure, respiration rate, temperature, the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, SOFA score, and SAPSII score in Model II, the high AG remained a significant predictor of 30-day, 90-day, and 365-day all-cause mortality compared with low AG (HR [95% CI], 1.62 [1.14–2.30]; 1.35 [1.04–1.84]; and 1.38 [1.03–1.84], respectively). Furthermore, for the sensitivity analysis, we considered the AG as a categorical variable, and observed the same trends (p for trends: <0.0001, 0.0010, and 0.0015 for the 30-day, 90-day, and 365-day all-cause mortality, respectively).

Figure 1

Association between anion gap and 30-day all-cause mortality. A threshold, nonlinear association between anion gap and 30-day all-cause mortality was found in a generalized additive mode. Solid rad line represents the smooth curve fit between variables. Imaginary lines represent the 95% of confidence interval from the fit.

Table 2

Relationship Between Anion Gap and All-Cause Mortality in Different Models

Variable	Crude Model		Model I		Model II
	HR (95% CIs)	P value	HR (95% CIs)	P value	HR (95% CIs)	P value
30-day all-cause mortality
Anion gap, mmol/L	1.12 (1.11, 1.14)	<0.0001	1.13 (1.11, 1.15)	<0.0001	1.07 (1.04, 1.10)	<0.0001
Anion gap (Quartile), mmol/L
<12	1.0(ref)		1.0(ref)		1.0(ref)
≥12, <14	0.97 (0.70, 1.34)	0.8524	1.03 (0.74, 1.42)	0.8652	0.82 (0.58, 1.15)	0.2496
≥14, <17	1.25 (0.94, 1.68)	0.1296	1.32 (0.99, 1.77)	0.0612	0.96 (0.70, 1.32)	0.7923
≥17	3.13 (2.37, 4.13)	<0.0001	3.18 (2.41, 4.20)	<0.0001	1.62 (1.14, 2.30)	0.0068
P for trend	<0.0001		<0.0001		<0.0001
90-day all-cause mortality
Anion gap, mmol/L	1.12 (1.10, 1.13)	<0.0001	1.12 (1.11, 1.14)	<0.0001	1.06 (1.03, 1.09)	<0.0001
Anion gap (Quartile), mmol/L
<12	1.0(ref)		1.0(ref)		1.0(ref)
≥12, <14	0.84 (0.64, 1.11)	0.2206	0.90 (0.68, 1.18)	0.4409	0.74 (0.55, 1.02)	0.0813
≥14, <17	1.05 (0.82, 1.35)	0.7062	1.12 (0.87, 1.44)	0.3741	0.80 (0.61, 1.05)	0.1125
≥17	2.43 (1.92, 3.09)	<0.0001	2.51 (1.97, 3.18)	<0.0001	1.35 (1.04, 1.84)	0.0429
P for trend	<0.0001		<0.0001		0.0010
365-day all-cause mortality
Anion gap, mmol/L	1.11 (1.10, 1.13)	<0.0001	1.12 (1.10, 1.14)	<0.0001	1.05 (1.03, 1.08)	0.0001
Anion gap (Quartile), mmol/L
<12	1.0(ref)		1.0(ref)		1.0(ref)
≥12, <14	0.97 (0.75, 1.25)	0.8116	1.03 (0.80, 1.33)	0.8250	0.86 (0.66, 1.12)	0.2651
≥14, <17	1.06 (0.84, 1.34)	0.6422	1.13 (0.89, 1.43)	0.3045	0.81 (0.63, 1.05)	0.1129
≥17	2.47 (1.97, 3.10)	<0.0001	2.55 (2.04, 3.20)	<0.0001	1.38 (1.03, 1.84)	0.0303
P for trend	<0.0001		<0.0001		0.0015

Notes: Models were derived from Cox proportional hazards regression models. Crude model adjust for: none. Adjust I model adjust for: age, ethnicity and gender. Adjust II model adjust for: age, ethnicity, gender, acute kidney injury stage, congestive heart failure, renal disease, stroke, malignancy, respiratory failure, pneumonia, sodium, potassium, chloride, BUN, PT, WBC, PH, creatinine, albumin, glucose, bicarbonate, vasopressor use, diastolic blood pressure, respiration rate, temperature, Elixhauser index, SOFA, SAPSII.

Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Subgroup Analyses

The results of the subgroup analysis of the associations between the AG and the 30-day all-cause mortality is shown in Table 3. The test for interactions was not statistically significant in most of the strata. Significant interactions were observed for ethnicity, CAD, bilirubin, hematocrit, hemoglobin, chloride, respiratory rate, and RRT (P < 0.05). Among these strata, patients with a higher AG exhibited significantly higher mortality, especially with regard to chloride ≥102 mmol/L and a respiratory rate ≥20 beats/minute. A similar trend was observed in White patients and those with CAD.

Table 3

Subgroup Analysis of the Associations Between Anion Gap and 30-Day All-Cause Mortality

Characteristic	N	HR (95% CI)	P value	P for Interaction
Age, years				0.2008
<72.9	621	1.14 (1.11, 1.17)	<0.0001
≥72.9	627	1.12 (1.10, 1.15)	<0.0001
Gender				0.6247
Female	511	1.12 (1.09, 1.14)	<0.0001
Male	737	1.13 (1.11, 1.15)	<0.0001
Ethnicity				0.0041
White	855	1.16 (1.13, 1.19)	<0.0001
Black	83	1.07 (1.00, 1.14)	0.0491
Other	310	1.11 (1.08, 1.14)	<0.0001
CHF				0.7634
No	721	1.13 (1.10, 1.15)	<0.0001
Yes	527	1.14 (1.11, 1.18)	<0.0001
CAD				<0.0001
No	543	1.10 (1.07, 1.12)	<0.0001
Yes	705	1.19 (1.15, 1.22)	<0.0001
AFIB				0.4855
No	660	1.13 (1.11, 1.16)	<0.0001
Yes	588	1.13 (1.10, 1.16)	<0.0001
Renal disease				0.0383
No	972	1.15 (1.12, 1.18)	<0.0001
Yes	276	1.11 (1.08, 1.15)	<0.0001
Liver disease				0.6737
No	1210	1.13 (1.11, 1.15)	<0.0001
Yes	38	1.10 (0.95, 1.27)	0.2030
Stroke				0.4105
No	1185	1.13 (1.11, 1.15)	<0.0001
Yes	63	1.25 (1.04, 1.49)	0.0166
Pneumonia				0.0698
No	845	1.14 (1.12, 1.16)	<0.0001
Yes	403	1.11 (1.06, 1.15)	<0.0001
Respiratory failure				0.0517
No	635	1.15 (1.12, 1.17)	<0.0001
Yes	613	1.12 (1.09, 1.15)	<0.0001
ARDS				0.3866
No	1225	1.14 (1.12, 1.16)	<0.0001
Yes	23	1.04 (0.90, 1.20)	0.5706
Malignancy				0.9078
No	1111	1.14 (1.12, 1.16)	<0.0001
Yes	137	1.16 (1.10, 1.22)	<0.0001
Albumin, g/dL				0.0812
<3.1	315	1.10 (1.07, 1.13)	<0.0001
≥3.1	384	1.16 (1.11, 1.21)	<0.0001
Bicarbonate, mg/dL				0.4811
<20	597	1.11 (1.09, 1.14)	<0.0001
≥20	651	1.14 (1.09, 1.19)	<0.0001
Bilirubin, mg/dL				0.0259
<0.7	418	1.14 (1.09, 1.19)	<0.0001
≥0.7	441	1.13 (1.10, 1.15)	<0.0001
Sodium, mmol/L				0.1491
<135	502	1.12 (1.09, 1.15)	<0.0001
≥135	746	1.15 (1.12, 1.17)	<0.0001
Potassium, mmol/L				0.1660
<3.7	562	1.15 (1.11, 1.20)	<0.0001
≥3.7	686	1.13 (1.11, 1.15)	<0.0001
Lactate, mmol/L				0.5146
<1.8	465	1.10 (1.05, 1.16)	0.0001
≥1.8	494	1.10 (1.08, 1.13)	<0.0001
BUN, mg/dL				0.1278
<27	591	1.14 (1.10, 1.18)	<0.0001
≥27	657	1.12 (1.10, 1.15)	<0.0001
PT, second				0.0816
<14.5	604	1.15 (1.10, 1.20)	<0.0001
≥14.5	606	1.12 (1.10, 1.14)	<0.0001
INR				0.0708
<1.3	498	1.17 (1.11, 1.23)	<0.0001
≥1.3	713	1.12 (1.10, 1.14)	<0.0001
APTT, second				0.7576
<32.9	610	1.12 (1.07, 1.16)	<0.0001
≥32.9	606	1.13 (1.11, 1.15)	<0.0001
WBC, 109 /L				0.6960
<10.8	624	1.12 (1.09, 1.15)	<0.0001
≥10.8	622	1.15 (1.12, 1.18)	<0.0001
Platelet, 109 /L				0.1366
<184	620	1.12 (1.09, 1.14)	<0.0001
≥184	627	1.18 (1.14, 1.22)	<0.0001
Hematocrit, %				0.0157
<29.6	619	1.11 (1.08, 1.13)	<0.0001
≥29.6	629	1.19 (1.15, 1.23)	<0.0001
Hemoglobin, g/dL				0.0100
<9.9	602	1.11 (1.09, 1.14)	<0.0001
≥9.9	645	1.19 (1.15, 1.23)	<0.0001
Creatinine, mEq/L				0.3452
<1.3	605	1.11 (1.06, 1.16)	<0.0001
≥1.3	643	1.13 (1.10, 1.15)	<0.0001
Glucose, mg/dL				0.1169
<114	616	1.12 (1.10, 1.15)	<0.0001
≥114	632	1.15 (1.12, 1.18)	<0.0001
Chloride, mmol/L				0.0027
<102	611	1.11 (1.09, 1.14)	<0.0001
≥102	637	1.17 (1.14, 1.20)	<0.0001
SBP, mmHg				0.4507
<103	621	1.13 (1.11, 1.15)	<0.0001
≥103	621	1.13 (1.08, 1.17)	<0.0001
DBP, mmHg				0.0629
<57	620	1.14 (1.12, 1.17)	<0.0001
≥57	622	1.12 (1.09, 1.15)	<0.0001
MBP, mmHg				0.0626
<72	619	1.14 (1.12, 1.17)	<0.0001
≥72	624	1.10 (1.07, 1.14)	<0.0001
Heart rate, beats/minute				0.2923
<89	621	1.14 (1.11, 1.17)	<0.0001
≥89	622	1.13 (1.11, 1.16)	<0.0001
Respiratory rate, beats/minute				0.0195
<20	617	1.12 (1.08, 1.17)	<0.0001
≥20	626	1.13 (1.10, 1.15)	<0.0001
Temperature, °C				0.2451
<36.7	593	1.13 (1.10, 1.16)	<0.0001
≥36.7	599	1.16 (1.12, 1.20)	<0.0001
SPO2, %				0.4524
<97	620	1.14 (1.11, 1.16)	<0.0001
≥97	620	1.13 (1.09, 1.17)	<0.0001
SOFA score				0.6956
<7	556	1.10 (1.05, 1.16)	0.0003
≥7	692	1.12 (1.10, 1.14)	<0.0001
SAPSII score				0.6197
<46	594	1.12 (1.06, 1.18)	<0.0001
≥46	654	1.11 (1.09, 1.13)	<0.0001
Vasopressor use				0.3629
No	232	1.09 (1.01, 1.18)	0.0213
Yes	1016	1.13 (1.11, 1.15)	<0.0001
RRT				0.0001
No	1045	1.14 (1.12, 1.17)	<0.0001
Yes	203	1.07 (1.03, 1.11)	0.0012

Abbreviations: CHF, congestive heart failure; CAD, coronary artery disease; AFIB, atrial fibrillation; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; PT, prothrombin time; INR, international normalized ratio; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; WBC, white blood cell; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; MBP, mean blood pressure; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; SAPSII, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II; RRT, renal replacement therapy.

Discussion

Our study demonstrated a J-shaped, nonlinear relationship between the AG and the 30-day all-cause mortality. After adjusting for covariates, a higher AG was associated with an increased risk of 30-day, 90-day, and 365-day all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with CS. Furthermore, after adjusting for additional confounding factors, a higher AG remained a significant predictor of all-cause mortality. High AG is associated with higher mortality in the multivariate model and the overall trend in the quartiles was statistically significant are match to the J-shape curve. It shows that the mortality of CS patients increases with the increase of AG level, and it is more obvious when the AG level is higher.

The AG is an applied mathematically derived parameter that has been used for more than 50 years and is the simplest method for the evaluation of patients based on the acid–base status, which is calculated as the difference between the measured serum cation and anion concentrations.7 Traditionally, the AG is one of the most commonly used biomarkers, and this parameter is routinely determined in all patients who are admitted to the ICU. Calculating the AG of critically ill patients is considered a sensitive and specific tool for predicting the prognosis or mortality risk.21,22 Previous studies reported that an increase in the AG may have prognostic significance in several diseases.9–11,23 In this study, a U-shaped relationship was observed with regard to AG and the all-cause mortality, and the AG was identified as a significant predictor of poor prognosis in CS patients after adjusting for relevant confounding factors.

Due to the insufficient cardiac output, CS constitutes a clinical syndrome of systemic hypotension and hypoperfusion that causes multiorgan failure, which manifests as oliguria, lactic acidosis, hyperpigmentation, and clammy limbs.24 An elevated serum AG is usually caused by the excessive production of organic acid anions and/or a concomitant decrease in anion excretion,7 wherein the lactic acid level and ketoanions are important factors.25 A possible mechanism is that the metabolic rate of patients with CS is significantly increased, with consequent sympathetic activation, accelerated glycolysis, and increased lactate levels; patients with heart failure and acute coronary syndrome have significantly elevated levels of blood ketone bodies.26–28 Furthermore, CS patients often have concomitant impairment of glomerular filtration function, which results in the retention of non-chlorine anions due to the accumulation of acidic substances.13 All of these data strongly suggest that higher AG might be associated with the prognosis of patients with CS; therefore, the results of this study support the abovementioned hypothesis.

Furthermore, McDonald, C.I. et al had reported the prognostic value of the AG in the patient of CS requiring ECMO support.16 But our study has explored the association between the AG and the all-cause mortality in all critically ill patients with CS which mean our study covered a wider population and applied to a wider range of people.

There are a few limitations of our study. First, as this was a retrospective analysis, the analysis is subject to selection bias. Second, the ICD-9 code for CS was used for diagnosis which may lead to bias. Third, we extracted the AG data for patients only based on the test upon their admission to the ICU and did not determine the trends of the changes in the AG, which may influence the reliability of the results. Fourth, as information on prognostic factors, such as cardiac troponin levels, was not available for some patients in the database, we were unable to calibrate all of the relevant confounders. Finally, this was an observational study and, therefore, we could not confirm the potential mechanism of action whereby a higher AG was related to the severity and prognosis of CS.

Conclusions

The relationship between the AG and 30-day all-cause mortality followed a J-shaped curve. Higher AG was associated with an increased risk of 30-day, 90-day, and 365-day all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with CS.