| Literature DB >> 34465308 |
Hengyu Zhao1,2,3, Lijie Yuan4, Zhishang Chen5,6, Yuting Liao7, Jiangzhou Lin5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To explore the characteristics of myocardial textures on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) images in patients with coronary atherosclerotic heart disease, a classification model was established, and the diagnostic effectiveness of CCTA for myocardial ischaemia patients was explored.Entities:
Keywords: Coronary CT angiography; Coronary atherosclerosis; Myocardial ischaemia; Texture features
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34465308 PMCID: PMC8406838 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-021-02206-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Fig. 1Workflow of the construction of the myocardial ischaemia model
Fig. 2A 56-year-old male patient with myocardial ischaemia. a Axial image, b coronal image, and c sagittal image. The window level was set to 100 HU, and the window width to 800 HU
Fig. 3A 61-year-old female patient without myocardial ischaemia. a Axial image, b coronal image, and c sagittal image. The window level was set to 100 HU, and the window width to 800 HU
Fig. 4Feature selection and dimension reduction. a Ten-fold cross-validation of the LASSO analysis was applied to acquire the most valuable features when the minimum lambda value was reached. b The regression coefficients from LASSO
Remaining features and the corresponding coefficients in multivariate logistic regression model
| Texture features | Estimate |
|---|---|
| (Intercept) | − 1.022 |
| RelativeDeviation | 0.886 |
| VoxelValueSum | − 1.696 |
| histogramEntropy | − 0.404 |
| skewness | − 0.228 |
| Correlation_AllDirection_offset7_SD | 0.440 |
| GLCMEntropy_angle45_offset7 | 0.096 |
| HaralickCorrelation_angle90_offset7 | 0.065 |
| RunLengthNonuniformity_AllDirection_offset7_SD | 1.625 |
| ShortRunEmphasis_AllDirection_offset4_SD | 0.942 |
| ShortRunEmphasis_angle45_offset7 | 1.508 |
| ShortRunLowGreyLevelEmphasis_AllDirection_offset1_SD | 0.820 |
| ShortRunLowGreyLevelEmphasis_AllDirection_offset7_SD | − 4.241 |
| SizeZoneVariability | − 0.531 |
| LowIntensitySmallAreaEmphasis | − 0.252 |
Machine learning model for training cohort and test cohort
| ACC | AUC | Specificity | Sensitivity | PPV | NPV | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Train cohort | 0.835 | 0.914 | 0.733 | 0.959 | 0.957 | 0.746 |
| Test cohort | 0.717 | 0.827 | 0.684 | 0.741 | 0.650 | 0.769 |
Fig. 5ROC curves of the training cohort (a) and test cohort (b)
Fig. 6Calibration curves of the nomogram for the training cohort (a) and test cohort (b)
Fig. 7The nomogram of the constructed model. We drew a vertical line from the “Radscore” predictor to the "Total Points" to obtain the score of the predictor. Then, a vertical line was drawn from the "Total Points" to the “probability” axis. Finally, the “probability” value obtained was the probability for the risk of myocardial ischaemia