Lynn Stothers1,2,3, Jennifer A Locke1, Marwa Abdulaziz1, Darren Lazare3, Alex Kavanagh1,2, Andrew Macnab1,4. 1. Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 2. International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 4. Stellenbosch Institute for Advanced Study, Wallenberg Research Centre at Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The role of imaging in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) assessment is unclear. Open magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems have a configuration that allows for imaging women with POP in different positions. Herein, we use a 0.5 Tesla open MRI to obtain supine, seated, and standing images. We then compare these images to evaluate the impact of posture on detection and staging of POP. METHODS: Women presenting with symptoms of POP at a tertiary care university hospital were asked to participate in this prospective cohort study. Symptom scores, POP-Q staging and three-position MRI imaging of the pelvis data were collected. The pubococcygeal line (PCL) was used to quantify within-patient changes in pelvic organ position as defined by: no displacement, <1 cm inferior to the PCL, mild (1-3 cm), moderate (3.1-6 cm), and severe (>6 cm) in the axial and sagittal T2-weighted images. Statistical analysis was completed (T-test; p<0.05 significant). RESULTS: A total of 42 women, age range 40-78 years, participated. There was a significant difference in the mean values associated with anterior prolapse in the supine (0.7±1.8), seated (2.4±3.4), and upright (4.2±1.6) positions (p=0.015). There was a significant difference in the mean values associated with apical prolapse in the supine (0.5±1.5), seated (1.5±1.4), and upright (2.1±1.5) positions (p=0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that POP is more readily detected and upstaged with standing MRI images as compared to supine and seated positions. The developed two-minute standing MRI protocol may enable clinicians to better assess the extent of POP.
INTRODUCTION: The role of imaging in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) assessment is unclear. Open magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems have a configuration that allows for imaging women with POP in different positions. Herein, we use a 0.5 Tesla open MRI to obtain supine, seated, and standing images. We then compare these images to evaluate the impact of posture on detection and staging of POP. METHODS: Women presenting with symptoms of POP at a tertiary care university hospital were asked to participate in this prospective cohort study. Symptom scores, POP-Q staging and three-position MRI imaging of the pelvis data were collected. The pubococcygeal line (PCL) was used to quantify within-patient changes in pelvic organ position as defined by: no displacement, <1 cm inferior to the PCL, mild (1-3 cm), moderate (3.1-6 cm), and severe (>6 cm) in the axial and sagittal T2-weighted images. Statistical analysis was completed (T-test; p<0.05 significant). RESULTS: A total of 42 women, age range 40-78 years, participated. There was a significant difference in the mean values associated with anterior prolapse in the supine (0.7±1.8), seated (2.4±3.4), and upright (4.2±1.6) positions (p=0.015). There was a significant difference in the mean values associated with apical prolapse in the supine (0.5±1.5), seated (1.5±1.4), and upright (2.1±1.5) positions (p=0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that POP is more readily detected and upstaged with standing MRI images as compared to supine and seated positions. The developed two-minute standing MRI protocol may enable clinicians to better assess the extent of POP.
Authors: R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Bernard T Haylen; Christopher F Maher; Matthew D Barber; Sérgio Camargo; Vani Dandolu; Alex Digesu; Howard B Goldman; Martin Huser; Alfredo L Milani; Paul A Moran; Gabriel N Schaer; Mariëlla I J Withagen Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2016-01-07 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Paul Abrams; Karl-Erik Andersson; Apostolos Apostolidis; Lori Birder; Donna Bliss; Linda Brubaker; Linda Cardozo; David Castro-Diaz; P R O'Connell; Alan Cottenden; Nikki Cotterill; Dirk de Ridder; Roger Dmochowski; Chantal Dumoulin; Mandy Fader; Christopher Fry; Howard Goldman; Philip Hanno; Yukio Homma; Vik Khullar; Chris Maher; Ian Milsom; Diane Newman; Rien J M Nijman; Kevin Rademakers; Dudley Robinson; Peter Rosier; Eric Rovner; Stefano Salvatore; Masayuki Takeda; Adrian Wagg; Todd Wagner; Alan Wein Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2018-08-14 Impact factor: 2.696