Literature DB >> 34464237

Effect of Esophageal Pressure-guided Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Survival from Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Risk-based and Mechanistic Reanalysis of the EPVent-2 Trial.

Todd Sarge1, Elias Baedorf-Kassis2, Valerie Banner-Goodspeed1, Victor Novack3, Stephen H Loring1, Michelle N Gong4, Deborah Cook5, Daniel Talmor1, Jeremy R Beitler6.   

Abstract

Rationale: In acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may depend on the extent to which multiorgan dysfunction contributes to risk of death, and the precision with which PEEP is titrated to attenuate atelectrauma without exacerbating overdistension.
Objectives: To evaluate whether multiorgan dysfunction and lung mechanics modified treatment effect in the EPVent-2 (Esophageal Pressure-guided Ventilation 2) trial, a multicenter trial of esophageal pressure (Pes)-guided PEEP versus empirical high PEEP in moderate to severe ARDS.
Methods: This post hoc reanalysis of the EPVent-2 trial evaluated for heterogeneity of treatment effect on mortality by baseline multiorgan dysfunction, determined via Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II). It also evaluated whether PEEP titrated to end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure near 0 cm H2O was associated with survival. Measurements and Main
Results: All 200 trial participants were included. Treatment effect on 60-day mortality differed by multiorgan dysfunction severity (P = 0.03 for interaction). Pes-guided PEEP was associated with lower mortality among patients with APACHE-II less than the median value (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.92) and may have had the opposite effect in patients with higher APACHE-II (hazard ratio, 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-3.05). Independent of treatment group or multiorgan dysfunction severity, mortality was lowest when PEEP titration achieved end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure near 0 cm H2O. Conclusions: The effect on survival of Pes-guided PEEP, compared with empirical high PEEP, differed by multiorgan dysfunction severity. Independent of multiorgan dysfunction, PEEP titrated to end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure closer to 0 cm H2O was associated with greater survival than more positive or negative values. These findings warrant prospective testing in a future trial.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute respiratory distress syndrome; mechanical ventilation; positive end-expiratory pressure; randomized controlled trial; ventilator-induced lung injury

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34464237      PMCID: PMC8759303          DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202009-3539OC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   30.528


  22 in total

1.  Treating individuals 2. Subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: importance, indications, and interpretation.

Authors:  Peter M Rothwell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Jan 8-14       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Limitations of applying summary results of clinical trials to individual patients: the need for risk stratification.

Authors:  David M Kent; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Implications of Heterogeneity of Treatment Effect for Reporting and Analysis of Randomized Trials in Critical Care.

Authors:  Theodore J Iwashyna; James F Burke; Jeremy B Sussman; Hallie C Prescott; Rodney A Hayward; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-11-01       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Volume Delivered During Recruitment Maneuver Predicts Lung Stress in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Jeremy R Beitler; Rohit Majumdar; Rolf D Hubmayr; Atul Malhotra; B Taylor Thompson; Robert L Owens; Stephen H Loring; Daniel Talmor
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials.

Authors:  S F Assmann; S J Pocock; L E Enos; L E Kasten
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-25       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Transpulmonary Pressure: The Importance of Precise Definitions and Limiting Assumptions.

Authors:  Stephen H Loring; George P Topulos; Rolf D Hubmayr
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 21.405

7.  APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system.

Authors:  W A Knaus; E A Draper; D P Wagner; J E Zimmerman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Esophageal pressures in acute lung injury: do they represent artifact or useful information about transpulmonary pressure, chest wall mechanics, and lung stress?

Authors:  Stephen H Loring; Carl R O'Donnell; Negin Behazin; Atul Malhotra; Todd Sarge; Ray Ritz; Victor Novack; Daniel Talmor
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-12-17

9.  The impact of high-risk patients on the results of clinical trials.

Authors:  J P Ioannidis; J Lau
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Heterogeneity of the baseline risk within patient populations of clinical trials: a proposed evaluation algorithm.

Authors:  J P Ioannidis; J Lau
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  8 in total

1.  The physiological foundations of critical care medicine: the contribution of Joseph Milic-Emili, a physiologist "by hook or by crook".

Authors:  V Marco Ranieri; Claude Guérin
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 9.097

2.  Retrospective Review of Transpulmonary Pressure Guided Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Titration for Mechanical Ventilation in Class II and III Obesity.

Authors:  Jesse Liou; Daniel Doherty; Tom Gillin; John Emberger; Yeonjoo Yi; Luis Cardenas; Michael Benninghoff; Michael Vest; Andrew Deitchman
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2022-04-29

3.  Transpulmonary Pressure to Guide Mechanical Ventilation: Art or Science?

Authors:  V Marco Ranieri; Tommaso Tonetti; Stefano Nava
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 4.  Unsuccessful and Successful Clinical Trials in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Addressing Physiology-Based Gaps.

Authors:  Jesús Villar; Carlos Ferrando; Gerardo Tusman; Lorenzo Berra; Pedro Rodríguez-Suárez; Fernando Suárez-Sipmann
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Lung and chest wall mechanics in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Alex K Pearce; W Cameron McGuire; Atul Malhotra
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Effects of different positive end-expiratory pressure titration strategies during prone positioning in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective interventional study.

Authors:  Christoph Boesing; Peter T Graf; Fabian Schmitt; Manfred Thiel; Paolo Pelosi; Patricia R M Rocco; Thomas Luecke; Joerg Krebs
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  External chest-wall compression in prolonged COVID-19 ARDS with low-compliance: a physiological study.

Authors:  Laurent J Brochard; Thomas Langer; Luca Bastia; Emanuele Rezoagli; Marcello Guarnieri; Doreen Engelberts; Clarissa Forlini; Francesco Marrazzo; Stefano Spina; Gabriele Bassi; Riccardo Giudici; Martin Post; Giacomo Bellani; Roberto Fumagalli
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 10.318

Review 8.  Evidence-Based Mechanical Ventilatory Strategies in ARDS.

Authors:  Adnan Liaqat; Matthew Mason; Brian J Foster; Sagar Kulkarni; Aisha Barlas; Awais M Farooq; Pooja Patak; Hamza Liaqat; Rafaela G Basso; Mohammed S Zaman; Dhaval Pau
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.241

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.