Literature DB >> 9368516

The impact of high-risk patients on the results of clinical trials.

J P Ioannidis1, J Lau.   

Abstract

The results of clinical trials may not reflect equally the experiences of all their individual participants. By modeling populations where patients have very diverse baseline risks of suffering an event of interest, it can be seen that very sick patients of high risk become the major determinants of how many events occur in the whole population, even though they may represent only a small minority. Human immunodeficiency virus-related trials and trials of magnesium in acute myocardial infarction are analyzed. When the benefit or toxicity from a treatment varies with the baseline risk of each patient, the treatment effect may be markedly different in populations with a different representation of high- and low-risk patients. The results of small clinical trials studying heterogeneous populations with binary outcomes depend on the sampling and outcomes of very few high risk participants. Conversely, mega-trials studying homogeneous populations would miss subgroups or individuals with diverse treatment responses. In both cases, aggregate trial results may be misleading for the care of many individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9368516     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00149-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  31 in total

1.  Prevention of thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation. A meta-analysis of trials of anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs.

Authors:  J B Segal; R L McNamara; M R Miller; N Kim; S N Goodman; N R Powe; K A Robinson; E B Bass
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Large multicenter trials: what do they achieve and what should be done in perfusion?

Authors:  Paul Myles
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2007-12

3.  Implications of Heterogeneity of Treatment Effect for Reporting and Analysis of Randomized Trials in Critical Care.

Authors:  Theodore J Iwashyna; James F Burke; Jeremy B Sussman; Hallie C Prescott; Rodney A Hayward; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-11-01       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Is primary angioplasty for some as good as primary angioplasty for all?

Authors:  David M Kent; Christopher H Schmid; Joseph Lau; Harry P Selker
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Preterm neonates benefit from low prophylactic platelet transfusion threshold despite varying risk of bleeding or death.

Authors:  Susanna F Fustolo-Gunnink; Karin Fijnvandraat; David van Klaveren; Simon J Stanworth; Anna Curley; Wes Onland; Ewout W Steyerberg; Ellen de Kort; Esther J d'Haens; Christian V Hulzebos; Elise J Huisman; Willem P de Boode; Enrico Lopriore; Johanna G van der Bom
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Variation in the net benefit of aggressive cardiovascular risk factor control across the US population of patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Justin W Timbie; Rodney A Hayward; Sandeep Vijan
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-06-28

7.  Welfare implications of learning through solicitation versus diversification in health care.

Authors:  Anirban Basu
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  Using group data to treat individuals: understanding heterogeneous treatment effects in the age of precision medicine and patient-centred evidence.

Authors:  Issa J Dahabreh; Rodney Hayward; David M Kent
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  Perspective: Limiting Dependence on Nonrandomized Studies and Improving Randomized Trials in Human Nutrition Research: Why and How.

Authors:  John F Trepanowski; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 10.  Treatment of lipid disorders after stroke.

Authors:  Joao A Gomes; Sander J Robins; Viken L Babikian
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.