| Literature DB >> 34463736 |
Jillian S Gauld1,2, Franziska Olgemoeller3,4, Eva Heinz3,5, Rose Nkhata4, Sithembile Bilima4, Alexander M Wailan6, Neil Kennedy7,8, Jane Mallewa9, Melita A Gordon4,10,9, Jonathan M Read2, Robert S Heyderman11, Nicholas R Thomson6,12, Peter J Diggle2, Nicholas A Feasey3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diverse environmental exposures and risk factors have been implicated in the transmission of Salmonella Typhi, but the dominant transmission pathways through the environment to susceptible humans remain unknown. Here, we use spatial, bacterial genomic, and hydrological data to refine our view of typhoid transmission in an endemic setting.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990 Salmonella typhi; environmental transmission; genomics; spatial patterns; typhoid fever
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34463736 PMCID: PMC9187325 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab745
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Infect Dis ISSN: 1058-4838 Impact factor: 20.999
Figure 1.Consort chart outlining the process of recruiting individuals to the study, reasons for exclusion, and data availability of geographic and genomic data. Abbreviation: ePAL, the electronic PArticipant Locator application.
Characteristics of Recruited Patients With Typhoid Fever Presenting to Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital in Blantyre, Malawi
| Characteristic or Outcome | Patients, No./Total (%) |
|---|---|
| Age, median (range), y | 11 (6–19) |
| Female sex | 256/542 (47.2) |
| Positive malaria test result | 7/533 (1.3) |
| Residence in urban Blantyre | 484/542 (89) |
| Admitted to the hospital | 391/542 (72.1) |
| Duration of hospital stay, median (IQR), d | 4 (3–7) |
| Death | 8/520 (1.5) |
Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range.
aData represent no. (%) of patients unless otherwise specified.
Figure 2.Estimated minimum annual incidence rate of typhoid fever for enumeration areas across the city of Blantyre, Malawi. The location of the recruiting hospital, Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, is noted.
Parameter Estimates for the Geostatistical Model of Typhoid Fever Incidence in Blantyre, Malawi
| Parameter | Parameter Estimate |
|
|---|---|---|
| Intercept | −5.02 (0.60) | <.001 |
| Average household size | −0.95 (0.14) | <.001 |
| Age 5–14 y | 1.08 (0.04) | <.001 |
| Age <5 y | 0.75 (0.04) | <.001 |
| log(sigma2), spatially correlated variance | 0.45 (0.11) | … |
| log(phi), range of spatial correlation | 318 (0.17) | … |
| log(tau2), non-spatial variance | 0.21 (0.23) | … |
Model includes the significant tested covariate of average household size and is stratified by age band.
Abbreviation: SE, standard error.
Figure 3.A, Joint ancestral state reconstruction tree based on whole-genome single-nucleotide variant (SNV) phylogenetic analysis for the sequenced isolates of Salmonella Typhi, showing the major clades of isolates determined using a root-to-tip directional approach. B, Further resolution of variation provided by decomposition of SNV matrix into the first 2 principal coordinates (PCs) of the multidimensional scale; colors of points represent membership in major clades, corresponding to the tree. C, Empirical semivariogram (proportional to 1 − spatial correlation as a function of distance) of PC2 of the SNV decomposition.
Figure 4.A. Major rivers of Blantyre with points indicating the approximate household locations of patients with typhoid fever. B, Approximate household locations are colored by genetic score, and river catchments are outlined using polygons. Catchments 2 and 8 are highlighted in yellow. Catchments not included in the analysis are in gray. Precise locations of households are masked by randomization.
Estimated Parameters for the Geostatistical Model of Genetic Scores, Representing the Genetic Heterogeneity in Salmonella Typhi Isolates.
| Parameter | Estimate | Standard Error |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Catchment 1 | 0.092 | 0.34 | .786 |
| Catchment 2 | −1.24 | 0.53 | .020 |
| Catchment 3 | 1.30 | 0.85 | .128 |
| Catchment 4 | 0.31 | 0.40 | .443 |
| Catchment 5 | 0.50 | 0.74 | .500 |
| Catchment 6 | 0.35 | 0.39 | .363 |
| Catchment 7 | 1.08 | 0.67 | .105 |
| Catchment 8 | −1.09 | 0.33 | .001 |
| Catchment 9 | 0.81 | 0.48 | .093 |
| Catchment 10 | 0.64 | 0.45 | .158 |
| sigma2 | 4.116 | 1.106 | - |
| phi | 40.496 | 1.119 | - |
| tau2 | 0.165 | 1.859 | - |
Hydrological catchment was included as a covariate in the model.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; SE, standard error.