| Literature DB >> 34463402 |
Jay Rasmussen1, Adam D Ewing2, Liviu-Gabriel Bodea3, Gabriela O Bodea1,2, Marla Gearing4, Geoffrey J Faulkner1,2.
Abstract
Age is one of the strongest risk factors for the development of neurodegenerative diseases, the majority of which involve misfolded protein aggregates in the brain. These protein aggregates are thought to drive pathology and are attractive targets for the development of new therapies. However, it is unclear how age influences the onset of pathology and the accompanying molecular response. To address this knowledge gap, we used a model of seeded tau pathology to profile the transcriptomic changes in 3 and 12 month old mice in response to developing tau hyperphosphorylation and aggregation. First, we found the burden of hyperphosphorylated tau pathology in mice injected at 12 months of age was moderately reduced compared to animals injected at 3 months. On a molecular level, we found an inflammation-related subset of genes, including C3 and the disease-associated microglia genes Ctsd, Cst7, and Clec7a, were more expressed early in disease in 12 but not 3 month old mice. These findings provide evidence of an early, age-specific response to tau pathology, which could serve as a marker for the severity of downstream pathology.Entities:
Keywords: RNA-seq; aging; tauopathy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34463402 PMCID: PMC9048516 DOI: 10.1111/bpa.13018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Pathol ISSN: 1015-6305 Impact factor: 7.611
FIGURE 1Host age influences the burden of tau pathology in seeded WT mice. (A) WT mice at three (3 mo) or twelve months old (12 mo) were injected in the dentate gyrus with control (Ctrl) or Alzheimer's disease (AD) human brain extracts and were then incubated for three different times termed early (1 mpi; mpi, months postinjection), middle (3 mpi), and late (5 mpi). (B) Western blot analysis of Ctrl and AD extracts showing total (Tau46), human (TAU‐13), and phosphorylated tau (pS396). Extracts from five patients were pooled for injections (see methods). Total protein staining was completed with Revert 700 (Licor). (C) Representative images of hyperphosphorylated tau (AT8) immunohistochemistry staining in the dentate gyrus of injected mice (n = 4–7, Scale bar = 100 μm). (D) Quantification of AT8‐positive puncta in the dentate gyrus of injected mice (Two‐way ANOVA, Age: F 1,28 = 9.144, p = 0.0053 (**); Incubation: F 2,28 = 27.01, p < 0.0001, no significant interaction; Bonferroni correction, late 3 mo vs. 12 mo p = 0.0117 (*)). Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. (E) Western blot analysis of sarkosyl insoluble extracts from the hippocampus of injected mice (n = 3–6). Antibodies used are the same as in (B) and include AT8 (used in C). Signal intensity relative to the 3 mo AD sample was calculated and then normalized to total protein. No significant differences were identified between 3 and 12 mo AD samples for pS396, AT8 or total tau for any of the stages (Mann–Whitney Test). Error bars represent the standard error of the mean
FIGURE 2A unique gene expression signature that includes a subset of glial genes is found in 12 mo mice at the early time point in AD injected mice. (A) Heatmap of RNA‐seq analysis showing z‐scores of log2(CPM + 1) values for all injected mice of differentially expressed genes (DEGs, EdgeR glm, Benjamini–Hochberg FDR < 0.05) at the early time point of 12 mo AD versus Ctrl. Red and blue colors represent up and downregulated genes, respectively. Sixty‐three DEGs in total were found in 12 mo mice and these were not significant in 3 mo mice at the early time point (n = 3–7). (B) STRING network analysis (v11.0) of DEGs identified in (A) showing relations between a subset of 35 related genes and their protein products. Line thickness indicates the strength of supporting data in STRING. The glial cell type where transcripts are expressed was determined using the Broad Institute Single Cell portal (Oligodendrocyte‐green; Microglia‐orange; Astrocyte‐yellow; Multiple‐gray; White‐undefined) [17]. (C) RNA‐seq gene plots for a selection of glial genes (EdgeR, glm, Benjamini–Hochberg). Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (n = 3–7). (*FDR < 0.05; **FDR < 0.01; ***FDR < 0.001) (D) Validation of differentially expressed glial genes using qPCR on additional biological replicates. Gene expression is presented as fold change relative to 3 mo Ctrl after normalizing to beta‐actin. (n = 5–6, Two‐way ANOVA [C3 Age: F 1,19 = 10.16, p = 0.0048; Treatment: F 1,19 = 14.80, p = 0.0011; Interaction: F 1,19 = 7.52, p = 0.013; Bonferroni correction 12 mo Ctrl vs. AD p = 0.0004 (***)] [Ctsd Age: F 1,19 = 4.92, p = 0.0389; Treatment: F 1,19 = 2.15, p = 0.1588; Interaction: F 1,19 = 6.11, p = 0.0231; Bonferroni correction 12 mo Ctrl vs. AD p = 0.0271 (*)] [Cst7 Age: F 1,19 = 18.82, p = 0.0004; Treatment: F 1,19 = 5.36, p = 0.0319; Interaction: F 1,19 = 5.66, p = 0.028; Bonferroni correction 12 mo Ctrl vs. AD p = 0.0086 (**)] [Clec7a Age: F 1,19 = 30.75, p < 0.0001; Treatment: F 1,19 = 7.86, p = 0.0114; Interaction: F 1,19 = 7.76, p = 0.0118; Bonferroni correction 12 mo Ctrl vs. AD p = 0.0021 (**)]). Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. (E) Western blot analysis of protein products from differentially expressed glial genes. Sarkosyl soluble fractions were analyzed with the signal normalized to total protein (Revert 700) and the abundance relative to 3 mo Ctrl. Ab, antibody probed blot image; TP, total protein stain (Revert 700). (n = 3, Two‐way ANOVA [C3 Age: F 1,8 = 11.14, p = 0.01; Treatment: F 1,8 = 1.13, p = 0.32; Interaction: F 1,8 = 1.84, p = 0.21] [Ctsd Age: F 1,8 = 0.61, p = 0.46; Treatment: F 1,8 = 11.38, p = 0.0097; Interaction: F 1,8 = 11.31, p = 0.0099; Bonferroni correction 12 mo Ctrl vs. AD p = 0.0028 (**)] [Cst7 Age: F 1,8 = 0.39, p = 0.55; Treatment: F 1,8 = 0.01, p = 0.91; Interaction: F 1,8 = 0.96, p = 0.36] [Clec7a Age: F 1,8 = 1.69, p = 0.23; Treatment: F 1,8 = 0.0008, p = 0.98; Interaction: F 1,8 = 2.04, p = 0.19]). Error bars represent the standard error of the mean