Literature DB >> 34459011

Accounting for not-at-random missingness through imputation stacking.

Lauren J Beesley1, Jeremy M G Taylor1.   

Abstract

Not-at-random missingness presents a challenge in addressing missing data in many health research applications. In this article, we propose a new approach to account for not-at-random missingness after multiple imputation through weighted analysis of stacked multiple imputations. The weights are easily calculated as a function of the imputed data and assumptions about the not-at-random missingness. We demonstrate through simulation that the proposed method has excellent performance when the missingness model is correctly specified. In practice, the missingness mechanism will not be known. We show how we can use our approach in a sensitivity analysis framework to evaluate the robustness of model inference to different assumptions about the missingness mechanism, and we provide R package StackImpute to facilitate implementation as part of routine sensitivity analyses. We apply the proposed method to account for not-at-random missingness in human papillomavirus test results in a study of survival for patients diagnosed with oropharyngeal cancer.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chained equations multiple imputation; fully conditional specification; not-at-random missingness; sensitivity analysis; stacked imputation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34459011      PMCID: PMC8595557          DOI: 10.1002/sim.9174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  10 in total

1.  How should variable selection be performed with multiply imputed data?

Authors:  Angela M Wood; Ian R White; Patrick Royston
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Missing data in clinical trials: from clinical assumptions to statistical analysis using pattern mixture models.

Authors:  Bohdana Ratitch; Michael O'Kelly; Robert Tosiello
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 1.894

3.  Individualized survival prediction for patients with oropharyngeal cancer in the human papillomavirus era.

Authors:  Lauren J Beesley; Peter G Hawkins; Lahin M Amlani; Emily L Bellile; Keith A Casper; Steven B Chinn; Avraham Eisbruch; Michelle L Mierzwa; Matthew E Spector; Gregory T Wolf; Andrew G Shuman; Jeremy M G Taylor
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Analysis of longitudinal trials with protocol deviation: a framework for relevant, accessible assumptions, and inference via multiple imputation.

Authors:  James R Carpenter; James H Roger; Michael G Kenward
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.051

5.  Sensitivity analysis after multiple imputation under missing at random: a weighting approach.

Authors:  James R Carpenter; Michael G Kenward; Ian R White
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  Practical considerations for sensitivity analysis after multiple imputation applied to epidemiological studies with incomplete data.

Authors:  Vanina Héraud-Bousquet; Christine Larsen; James Carpenter; Jean-Claude Desenclos; Yann Le Strat
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  A stacked approach for chained equations multiple imputation incorporating the substantive model.

Authors:  Lauren J Beesley; Jeremy M G Taylor
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 1.701

8.  Evaluation of a weighting approach for performing sensitivity analysis after multiple imputation.

Authors:  Panteha Hayati Rezvan; Ian R White; Katherine J Lee; John B Carlin; Julie A Simpson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  A general method for elicitation, imputation, and sensitivity analysis for incomplete repeated binary data.

Authors:  Daniel Tompsett; Stephen Sutton; Shaun R Seaman; Ian R White
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  On the use of the not-at-random fully conditional specification (NARFCS) procedure in practice.

Authors:  Daniel Mark Tompsett; Finbarr Leacy; Margarita Moreno-Betancur; Jon Heron; Ian R White
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.373

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Multiple imputation with missing data indicators.

Authors:  Lauren J Beesley; Irina Bondarenko; Michael R Elliot; Allison W Kurian; Steven J Katz; Jeremy Mg Taylor
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 2.494

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.