Literature DB >> 32920819

A stacked approach for chained equations multiple imputation incorporating the substantive model.

Lauren J Beesley1, Jeremy M G Taylor1.   

Abstract

Multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE) has emerged as a popular approach for handling missing data. A central challenge for applying MICE is determining how to incorporate outcome information into covariate imputation models, particularly for complicated outcomes. Often, we have a particular analysis model in mind, and we would like to ensure congeniality between the imputation and analysis models. We propose a novel strategy for directly incorporating the analysis model into the handling of missing data. In our proposed approach, multiple imputations of missing covariates are obtained without using outcome information. We then utilize the strategy of imputation stacking, where multiple imputations are stacked on top of each other to create a large data set. The analysis model is then incorporated through weights. Instead of applying Rubin's combining rules, we obtain parameter estimates by fitting a weighted version of the analysis model on the stacked data set. We propose a novel estimator for obtaining standard errors for this stacked and weighted analysis. Our estimator is based on the observed data information principle in Louis' work and can be applied for analyzing stacked multiple imputations more generally. Our approach for analyzing stacked multiple imputations is the first method that can be easily applied (using R package StackImpute) for a wide variety of standard analysis models and missing data settings.
© 2020 The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chained equations; multiple imputation; stacked imputation; substantive model compatible imputation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32920819      PMCID: PMC9053403          DOI: 10.1111/biom.13372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   1.701


  10 in total

1.  Multiple imputation of missing blood pressure covariates in survival analysis.

Authors:  S van Buuren; H C Boshuizen; D L Knook
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Cigarette use, comorbidities, and prognosis in a prospective head and neck squamous cell carcinoma population.

Authors:  Lisa A Peterson; Emily L Bellile; Gregory T Wolf; Shama Virani; Andrew G Shuman; Jeremy M G Taylor; Laura S Rozek
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.147

3.  Using the outcome for imputation of missing predictor values was preferred.

Authors:  Karel G M Moons; Rogier A R T Donders; Theo Stijnen; Frank E Harrell
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  How should variable selection be performed with multiply imputed data?

Authors:  Angela M Wood; Ian R White; Patrick Royston
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Interleukin-6 predicts recurrence and survival among head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Sonia A Duffy; Jeremy M G Taylor; Jeffrey E Terrell; Mozaffarul Islam; Yun Li; Karen E Fowler; Gregory T Wolf; Theodoros N Teknos
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Comparison of imputation variance estimators.

Authors:  R A Hughes; Jac Sterne; K Tilling
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  Multiple imputation of missing covariates for the Cox proportional hazards cure model.

Authors:  Lauren J Beesley; Jonathan W Bartlett; Gregory T Wolf; Jeremy M G Taylor
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Imputing missing covariate values for the Cox model.

Authors:  Ian R White; Patrick Royston
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Multiple imputation of covariates by fully conditional specification: Accommodating the substantive model.

Authors:  Jonathan W Bartlett; Shaun R Seaman; Ian R White; James R Carpenter
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.021

10.  Joint modelling rationale for chained equations.

Authors:  Rachael A Hughes; Ian R White; Shaun R Seaman; James R Carpenter; Kate Tilling; Jonathan A C Sterne
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 4.615

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Accounting for not-at-random missingness through imputation stacking.

Authors:  Lauren J Beesley; Jeremy M G Taylor
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-08-29       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Explore association of genes in PDL1/PD1 pathway to radiotherapy survival benefit based on interaction model strategy.

Authors:  Junjie Shen; Jingfang Liu; Peng Sun; Zaixiang Tang; Huijun Li; Lu Bai; Zixuan Du; Ruirui Geng; Jianping Cao
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  On the Treatment of Missing Item Responses in Educational Large-Scale Assessment Data: An Illustrative Simulation Study and a Case Study Using PISA 2018 Mathematics Data.

Authors:  Alexander Robitzsch
Journal:  Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ       Date:  2021-12-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.