Literature DB >> 34458878

A Multimodal Interdisciplinary QI Intervention Is Associated with Reduction in After Hours Inpatient Endoscopy Cases.

Sonali Palchaudhuri1, Sara Attalla1, Shivan J Mehta1, Afshin Parsikia1, Richard T White2, Nuzhat A Ahmad1, Gregory G Ginsberg1, Mark S Weiss3, Colleen Demopoulos1, John Keogh2,3, David C Metz1, Michael L Kochman1, Shazia Mehmood Siddique1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Increasing demand for inpatient endoscopic services results in performing more non-emergent endoscopic cases after-hours, which poses risks to patient safety and negatively impacts patient and provider satisfaction. This study sought to quantify the existing state using quality improvement (QI) methodology, design targeted interventions, and determine their effectiveness.
METHODS: We conducted an existing state evaluation through a process map, time-series study, and caseload analysis from 7/2017-12/2018. Using end-of-workday (EOW) as a proxy for patient/provider dissatisfaction and risk for patient safety events, we performed a prospective evaluation of a staged interdisciplinary multimodal intervention aimed to decrease the proportion of days with EOW after 7PM, decrease the proportion of cases begun after 5PM, and decrease EOW variability. The post-intervention period was 6/2019-2/2020.
RESULTS: Based on existing state analyses, we implemented a series of targeted interventions: (1) provider workflow tips, (2) expedited transport for select patients, (3) pathway to reschedule appropriate cases to outpatient endoscopy, and (4) increased staffing for high caseload days through resource pooling. The proportion of days with EOW after 7PM decreased from 42.4% to 29.3% (caseload-adjusted odds ratio of 0.39, p< 0.001). Despite increased caseload, cases begun after 5PM decreased from 17.5% to 14.2% (OR 0.75, p = 0.009). EOW SD decreased from 2:20 hours to 1:36 hours.
CONCLUSIONS: The multimodal intervention reduced days with EOW after 7PM and the proportion of cases begun after 5PM, despite increased caseload. This study shows how applying research methods to implement QI interventions successfully decreases late inpatient endoscopic cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  delivery science; endoscopic workflow; inpatient endoscopy; procedural efficiency

Year:  2021        PMID: 34458878      PMCID: PMC8386508          DOI: 10.1016/j.tige.2021.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Innov Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 2590-0307


  12 in total

1.  Medscape's response to the Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.

Authors:  M Leavitt
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2001-03-05

2.  Predictors of Inadequate Inpatient Colonoscopy Preparation and Its Association with Hospital Length of Stay and Costs.

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati; Elyse R Johnston; Dyanna L Gregory; Jody D Ciolino; Andrew Cooper; Rajesh N Keswani
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Endoscopy unit efficiency.

Authors:  Ziad F Gellad
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2014-05

4.  Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  R M Ness; R Manam; H Hoen; N Chalasani
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Improving the timeliness of procedures in a pediatric endoscopy suite.

Authors:  Gitit Tomer; Steven Choi; Andrea Montalvo; Sheila Sutton; John Thompson; Yolanda Rivas
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Efficiency of an endoscopy suite in a teaching hospital: delays, prolonged procedures, and hospital waiting times.

Authors:  Elaine Yong; Olga Zenkova; Fred Saibil; Lawrence B Cohen; Kay Rhodes; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Impact of Endotracheal Intubation on Interventional Endoscopy Unit Efficiency Metrics at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  Yaseen B Perbtani; Robert J Summerlee; Dennis Yang; Qi An; Alejandro Suarez; J Blair Williamson; Charles W Shrode; Anand R Gupte; Shailendra S Chauhan; Peter V Draganov; Chris E Forsmark; Myron Chang; Mihir S Wagh
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  An initial investigation of efficiency in endoscopy delivery.

Authors:  Saeed Zamir; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 9.  Studying and Incorporating Efficiency into Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Centers.

Authors:  Lukejohn W Day; David Belson
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 2.260

10.  A Patient Flow Analysis: Identification of Process Inefficiencies and Workflow Metrics at an Ambulatory Endoscopy Unit.

Authors:  Rowena Almeida; William G Paterson; Nancy Craig; Lawrence Hookey
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-03-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.