Literature DB >> 17089077

Medical school application interview score has limited predictive validity for performance on a fourth year clinical practice examination.

William T Basco1, Carol J Lancaster, Gregory E Gilbert, Maura E Carey, Amy V Blue.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: : Data supporting the predictive validity of the medical school admission interview are mixed. This study tested the hypothesis that the admission interview is predictive of interpersonal interactions between medical students and standardized patients.
METHOD: : We determined correlations between admission interview scores and performance on a senior-year Clinical Practice Examination piloting US National Board of Medical Examiners stations. We also completed regression analyses controlling for undergraduate academic performance, gender and ethnicity. Outcome measures included an Interpersonal Skills score and a separate Overall Checklist performance score, completed by standardized patients.
RESULTS: : The applicant interview had limited but statistically significant correlation with the Interpersonal Skills (r = 0.15; p < 0.05) score. The applicant interview had a correlation of 0.13 with the Overall Checklist score (p = .056). In linear regression models, the applicant interview had limited but statistically significant correlations with the Interpersonal Skills score and the Overall Checklist score.
CONCLUSION: : As practiced at this medical school, the admission interview has limited predictive validity for future interactions with standardized patients. More comprehensive assessment of interpersonal skills during the medical school selection process will be needed in order to better select matriculants with desirable interpersonal skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17089077     DOI: 10.1007/s10459-006-9031-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  8 in total

1.  Limited Predictive Utility of Admissions Scores and Objective Structured Clinical Examinations for APPE Performance.

Authors:  Jacqueline E McLaughlin; Julia Khanova; Kelly Scolaro; Philip T Rodgers; Wendy C Cox
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Competing duties: medical educators, underperforming students, and social accountability.

Authors:  Thalia Arawi; Philip M Rosoff
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  More Than Their Test Scores: Redefining Success with Multiple Mini-Interviews.

Authors:  Ann Blair Kennedy; Cindy Nessim Youssef Riyad; Laura H Gunn; April Gant Brown; Kandyce Brooke Dunlap; Melissa Elizabeth Knutsen; Alicia Anne Dahl
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2020-07-02

4.  The roles of personal interview and cognitive abilities at admission to medical school in predicting performance of medical students in their internal medicine sub-internship.

Authors:  Idit F Liberty; Lena Novack; Reli Hershkovitz; Amos Katz
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.263

5.  Comparison of communication skills between medical students admitted after interviews or on academic merits.

Authors:  Marie Dahlin; Stina Söderberg; Ulla Holm; Ingrid Nilsson; Lars-Ove Farnebo
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Role of students' context in predicting academic performance at a medical school: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tamara Thiele; Daniel Pope; A Singleton; D Stanistreet
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Non-cognitive selected students do not outperform lottery-admitted students in the pre-clinical stage of medical school.

Authors:  Susanna M Lucieer; Karen M Stegers-Jager; Remy M J P Rikers; Axel P N Themmen
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 3.853

8.  Is perfect good? - Dimensions of perfectionism in newly admitted medical students.

Authors:  Helen Seeliger; Sigrid Harendza
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 2.463

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.