Literature DB >> 34457739

Do Voluntary Lab-Based Active Learning Sessions Impact Medical Student Knowledge Retention?

Louise B Lawson1, Caroline M Lind2, Jennifer W Gibson2, Kerstin Höner Zu Bentrup1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite recent evidence demonstrating the benefits of case-based and active learning strategies in medical education, many medical schools have reduced or entirely eliminated teaching laboratories in medical microbiology courses. The objective of our investigation was to analyze the impact of a voluntary hands-on microbiology laboratory session on students' knowledge retention and ability to apply the underlying principles to exam questions in our Introduction to Infectious Diseases (IID) course.
METHODS: We compared the performance of students participating in the wet labs with those who did not, analyzing scores on exam questions directly related to the concepts presented in the laboratory session and their overall scores on the IID module exam. The voluntary nature of our microbiology lab session provided a unique opportunity to assess its impact on knowledge retention independent of other factors, such as lecture and exam content, etc. Data were collected for 7 academic years and analyzed in aggregate.
RESULTS: Students who attended voluntary lab sessions scored higher on exam questions related to lab exercises than students who did not attend (Mann-Whitney, p = 0.0074). These results support the benefit of reexamining material originally presented during classroom sessions in an active, collaborative learning environment. Course evaluation responses indicted that students valued the opportunity to visually reinforce concepts they had previously read in a textbook or heard in lectures.
CONCLUSIONS: At a time when many medical schools are reducing or eliminating hands-on lab sessions in microbiology and other basic sciences, our results highlight the benefits of this teaching strategy. The laboratory session provided an opportunity for students to revisit concepts initially presented in the traditional classroom setting and to actively engage in applying these concepts to case-based scenarios. The improved educational outcomes will benefit students in future standardized exams as well as in their professional practice. © International Association of Medical Science Educators 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active learning; Laboratory medicine; Medical students; Microbiology; Wet lab

Year:  2020        PMID: 34457739      PMCID: PMC8368564          DOI: 10.1007/s40670-020-00956-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Educ        ISSN: 2156-8650


  13 in total

Review 1.  The future of microbiology laboratory classes--wet, dry or in combination?

Authors:  Neil Baker; Joanna Verran
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Review of three decades of laboratory exercises in the preclinical curriculum at the Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine.

Authors:  S Genuth; D Caston; B Lindley; J Smith
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Educating medical students in laboratory medicine: a proposed curriculum.

Authors:  Brian R Smith; Maria Aguero-Rosenfeld; John Anastasi; Beverly Baron; Anders Berg; Jay L Bock; Sheldon Campbell; Kendall P Crookston; Robert Fitzgerald; Mark Fung; Richard Haspel; John Greg Howe; Jeffrey Jhang; Malek Kamoun; Susan Koethe; Matthew D Krasowski; Marie L Landry; Marisa B Marques; Henry M Rinder; William Roberts; William E Schreiber; Steven L Spitalnik; Christopher A Tormey; Paul Wolf; Yan Yun Wu
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  First-year medical students prefer multiple learning styles.

Authors:  Heidi L Lujan; Stephen E DiCarlo
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.288

5.  Commentary: IDSA guidelines for improving the teaching of preclinical medical microbiology and infectious diseases.

Authors:  Frederick Southwick; Peter Katona; Carol Kauffman; Sara Monroe; Liise-anne Pirofski; Carlos del Rio; Harry Gallis; William Dismukes
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  The mediating effect of context variation in mixed practice for transfer of basic science.

Authors:  Kulamakan Kulasegaram; Cynthia Min; Elizabeth Howey; Alan Neville; Nicole Woods; Kelly Dore; Geoffrey Norman
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.853

7.  Contexts, concepts and cognition: principles for the transfer of basic science knowledge.

Authors:  Kulamakan M Kulasegaram; Zarah Chaudhary; Nicole Woods; Kelly Dore; Alan Neville; Geoffrey Norman
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 6.251

8.  A Comprehensive Survey of Preclinical Microbiology Curricula Among US Medical Schools.

Authors:  Dora J Melber; Arianne Teherani; Brian S Schwartz
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Factors Influencing Internal Medicine Resident Choice of Infectious Diseases or Other Specialties: A National Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Erin M Bonura; Eun Sul Lee; Katrina Ramsey; Wendy S Armstrong
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Learning psychological research and statistical concepts using retrieval-based practice.

Authors:  Stephen Wee Hun Lim; Gavin Jun Peng Ng; Gabriel Qi Hao Wong
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.