Literature DB >> 34457659

"I Think I Was Losing the Forest for the Trees": Evaluation of an Internal Medicine Residency Quality Improvement Curriculum.

Amanda G Kennedy1, Maria Burnett1, Preetika Muthukrishnan1, Halle Sobel1, Constance van Eeghen1, Allen B Repp1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Quality improvement (QI) training during residency may not be adequately preparing physicians for achieving Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education goals and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) Triple Aim. The purpose of this evaluation was to identify residents' perceptions and impact of their QI curriculum.
METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation of an active-learning QI curriculum for internal medicine residents at one academic medical center. Data from 2017 to 2018 included a focus group, pre-post survey, project data, and curricular materials. Results were categorized using Kirkpatrick's model of evaluation.
RESULTS: All second-year internal medicine residents completed the curriculum (N = 14). Residents were satisfied with the structure and perceived accomplishment with the curriculum, however were dissatisfied by the impact of inconsistent attendance due to clinical conflicts. Their confidence in QI increased; however, they reported difficulty retaining knowledge and skills. Survey scores related to usefulness and anticipated application of QI were unchanged from baseline.
CONCLUSIONS: This applied QI curriculum appeared to improve short-term learning. However, the curriculum did not promote long-term understanding of QI. Finding ways to promote skills and retention beyond the curriculum requires further study. © International Association of Medical Science Educators 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Curriculum; Education; Graduate/standards; Internship and Residency; Medical; Quality Improvement; Quality of Health Care

Year:  2019        PMID: 34457659      PMCID: PMC8368586          DOI: 10.1007/s40670-019-00854-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Educ        ISSN: 2156-8650


  9 in total

1.  The triple aim: care, health, and cost.

Authors:  Donald M Berwick; Thomas W Nolan; John Whittington
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 2.  Residents' engagement in quality improvement: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Carl A Patow; Kelly Karpovich; Lee Ann Riesenberg; Joseph Jaeger; Joel C Rosenfeld; Mary Wittenbreer; Jamie S Padmore
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Faculty-Resident "Co-learning": A Longitudinal Exploration of an Innovative Model for Faculty Development in Quality Improvement.

Authors:  Brian M Wong; Joanne Goldman; Jeannette M Goguen; Christian Base; Leahora Rotteau; Elaine Van Melle; Ayelet Kuper; Kaveh G Shojania
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Has the new Kirkpatrick generation built a better hammer for our evaluation toolbox?

Authors:  Katherine A Moreau
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 3.650

5.  "It Feels Like a Lot of Extra Work": Resident Attitudes About Quality Improvement and Implications for an Effective Learning Health Care System.

Authors:  Jorie M Butler; Katherine A Anderson; Mark A Supiano; Charlene R Weir
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  The Quality Improvement Knowledge Application Tool Revised (QIKAT-R).

Authors:  Mamta K Singh; Greg Ogrinc; Karen R Cox; Mary Dolansky; Julie Brandt; Laura J Morrison; Beth Harwood; Greg Petroski; Al West; Linda A Headrick
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 7.  Quality Improvement Education in Residency Training: A Review.

Authors:  Teresa L Massagli; Jennifer M Zumsteg; Marisa B Osorio
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.159

Review 8.  Quality improvement in medical education: current state and future directions.

Authors:  Brian M Wong; Wendy Levinson; Kaveh G Shojania
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.251

9.  SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.

Authors:  Greg Ogrinc; Louise Davies; Daisy Goodman; Paul Batalden; Frank Davidoff; David Stevens
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 7.035

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.