Literature DB >> 28649887

Has the new Kirkpatrick generation built a better hammer for our evaluation toolbox?

Katherine A Moreau1,2,3.   

Abstract

Although Kirkpatrick's original outcome-focused model is widely used to evaluate medical education programs, it is subject to criticism. To combat this criticism and address the complexities of learning environments, the New World Kirkpatrick Model has emerged. This brief article describes key aspects of the New World Kirkpatrick Model for program evaluation. Specifically, it highlights three major criticisms of Kirkpatrick's original model and discusses the ways in which this new model attempts to rebut them. By doing so, this article hopes to encourage medical teachers to try the New World Kirkpatrick Model in the evaluation of their complex educational programs and investigate its strengths and weaknesses.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28649887     DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1337874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  22 in total

1.  Case-Based Teaching: Does the Addition of High-Fidelity Simulation Make a Difference in Medical Students' Clinical Reasoning Skills?

Authors:  Mary Kathryn Mutter; James R Martindale; Neeral Shah; Maryellen E Gusic; Stephen J Wolf
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2020-01-10

2.  "I Think I Was Losing the Forest for the Trees": Evaluation of an Internal Medicine Residency Quality Improvement Curriculum.

Authors:  Amanda G Kennedy; Maria Burnett; Preetika Muthukrishnan; Halle Sobel; Constance van Eeghen; Allen B Repp
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2019-11-15

Review 3.  COVID-19 Effects on Medical Education: A Viral Transfer of Knowledge to Radiation Oncology.

Authors:  Shauna R Campbell; Richard Castillo; Nafisha Lalani; Paris-Ann Ingledew
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 8.013

Review 4.  Knowledge to action: a scoping review of approaches to educate primary care providers in the identification and management of routine sleep disorders.

Authors:  Svetlana King; Raechel Damarell; Lambert Schuwirth; Andrew Vakulin; Ching Li Chai-Coetzer; R Doug McEvoy
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.062

5.  Comparing Kirkpatrick's original and new model with CIPP evaluation model.

Authors:  Roghayeh Gandomkar
Journal:  J Adv Med Educ Prof       Date:  2018-04

6.  Setting competencies and standards for a European Leadership Program in Geriatric Medicine: "The European Academy for Medicine of Ageing (EAMA) reloaded".

Authors:  Regina Elisabeth Roller-Wirnsberger; Nele van den Noortgate; Sylvie Bonin-Guillaume; Karen Andersen-Ranberg; Anette Hylen Ranhoff; Thomas Münzer; Tomasz Grodzicki; Simon Conroy; Francesco Landi; Louis Mieiro; Ulrike Dapp; Robertus van Deelen; Rannveig Sakshaug Eldholm; Nicolas Martinez-Velilla; Katrin Singler
Journal:  Eur Geriatr Med       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 1.710

7.  Enterprise Microblogging to Augment the Subinternship Clinical Learning Experience: A Proof-of-Concept Quality Improvement Study.

Authors:  Irsk Anderson; Oliver Hulland; Jeanne M Farnan; Wei Wei Lee; Debra Milton; Vineet M Arora
Journal:  JMIR Med Educ       Date:  2018-08-21

Review 8.  Unmet need for interprofessional education in paediatric cancer: a scoping review.

Authors:  Martha Krogh Topperzer; Marianne Hoffmann; Louise Ingerslev Roug; Hanne Bækgaard Larsen; Birgitte Lausen; Kjeld Schmiegelow; Jette Led Sørensen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  The pharmacology course for preclinical students using team-based learning.

Authors:  Do-Hwan Kim; Jung-Ho Lee; Soon Ae Kim
Journal:  Korean J Med Educ       Date:  2020-03-01

10.  Analysing synthesis of evidence in a systematic review in health professions education: observations on struggling beyond Kirkpatrick.

Authors:  Gillian Maudsley; David Taylor
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2020-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.