Literature DB >> 34457582

Auditory Narrative Does Not Improve Learning when Added to Visual Computer-Based Learning Modules.

Anne Mounsey1, Alfred Reid1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Computer-based learning (CBL) is considered by many to be an effective means of education. However, features of computer-based modules purported to contribute to learning have not been studied with medical student education.
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate the effect of auditory supplements in a computer-based instructional module on learning and knowledge retention.
DESIGN: A prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of two types of web-based instructional presentations used to teach key aspects of systems-based practice to fourth-year medical students. INTERVENTION: The intervention and control group each received a computer-based module comprised of the same mix of visual and written material, but the intervention group also received an auditory narration of the materials. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were the difference in the students' scores between the two modules using an online 8-item knowledge test completed immediately after the first exposure to the module and again 1 to 7 months later. Students were also asked whether they considered themselves auditory learners. Learning efficiency (the amount of learning per unit time) was calculated for each student and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare scores between the two groups.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty fourth-year medical students were randomized by a computer program to one of the two modules. All students completed the first knowledge test and 86 (66%) students completed the second test. Test scores did not differ significantly between the two groups in either the first or the second test. Learning efficiency was lower in the intervention group. Self-identification as auditory learners had no effect on performance.
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of narration to a computer-based instructional module did not improve learning or knowledge retention even in students who self-identified as auditory learners and resulted in overall lower learning efficiency. © International Association of Medical Science Educators 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-based learning; Education; Systems-based practice

Year:  2019        PMID: 34457582      PMCID: PMC8368538          DOI: 10.1007/s40670-019-00801-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Educ        ISSN: 2156-8650


  9 in total

Review 1.  Web-based learning: sound educational method or hype? A review of the evaluation literature.

Authors:  Heidi S Chumley-Jones; Alison Dobbie; Cynthia L Alford
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Learning styles: where's the evidence?

Authors:  Doug Rohrer; Harold Pashler
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 3.  The research we still are not doing: an agenda for the study of computer-based learning.

Authors:  David A Cook
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Self-study from web-based and printed guideline materials. A randomized, controlled trial among resident physicians.

Authors:  D S Bell; G C Fonarow; R D Hays; C M Mangione
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-06-20       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Web-based education in systems-based practice: a randomized trial.

Authors:  B Price Kerfoot; Paul R Conlin; Thomas Travison; Graham T McMahon
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-02-26

6.  Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence.

Authors:  Harold Pashler; Mark McDaniel; Doug Rohrer; Robert Bjork
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2008-12-01

Review 7.  Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  David A Cook; Anthony J Levinson; Sarah Garside; Denise M Dupras; Patricia J Erwin; Victor M Montori
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  A randomised trial of an online lecture with and without audio.

Authors:  Anderson Spickard; Jeffrey Smithers; David Cordray; Joseph Gigante; James L Wofford
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.251

9.  Evidence-Based Higher Education - Is the Learning Styles 'Myth' Important?

Authors:  Philip M Newton; Mahallad Miah
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.