| Literature DB >> 34457018 |
Rendong Han1, Liya Gao2, Hongbo Sun2, Mei Li2, Chunxia Deng2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of Yiqi Buxue decoction on hemodynamic changes of the uterine artery and fetal umbilical artery and pregnancy outcomes in pregnant patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34457018 PMCID: PMC8387161 DOI: 10.1155/2021/1849114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Comparison of general data of patients.
| Items | Group A ( | Group B ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | ||||
| Range | 20–45 | 21–45 | ||
| Average age | 32.98 ± 5.68 | 32.15 ± 5.98 | 0.780 | 0.437 |
|
| ||||
| Gestational age (weeks) | ||||
| Range | 6–37 | 6–38 | ||
| Average gestational age | 33.26 ± 5.98 | 33.45 ± 5.24 | 0.185 | 0.854 |
| Number of multiparae | 21 | 20 | 0.037 | 0.847 |
| Number of primiparae | 39 | 40 | ||
|
| ||||
| Causes of PAH | ||||
| Congenital heart disease (CHD) | 25 | 24 | 0.035 | 0.853 |
| Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) | 15 | 16 | 0.044 | 0.835 |
| Hypertensive heart disease (HHD) | 10 | 12 | 0.223 | 0.637 |
| Other | 10 | 8 | 0.261 | 0.609 |
| Number of fetus | 0.261 | 0.609 | ||
| Single birth | 50 | 52 | ||
| Multiple birth | 10 | 8 | ||
| Number of patients who received cardiac therapy | 2 | 3 | 0.209 | 0.648 |
| Residence | 0.040 | 0.841 | ||
| Urban area | 42 | 43 | ||
| Rural area | 18 | 17 | ||
| Monthly income (yuan) | 0.035 | 0.852 | ||
| ≥4000 | 36 | 37 | ||
| <4000 | 24 | 23 | ||
|
| ||||
| PAH degree | ||||
| Mild | 38 | 40 | 0.147 | 0.702 |
| Moderate | 16 | 15 | 0.044 | 0.835 |
| Severe | 6 | 5 | 0.100 | 0.752 |
| Education | 0.139 | 0.709 | ||
| Senior high school and below | 25 | 23 | ||
| University and above | 35 | 37 | ||
Figure 1Comparison of hemodynamic changes in the uterine artery ( ± s). The abscissa represents before and after treatment. The black area is group A, and the gray area is group B. (a) The uterine artery PI. With no statistical difference in the PI between the two groups before treatment (1.31 ± 0.06 and 1.32 ± 0.07, P > 0.05), the PI in group A after treatment was notably lower compared with that in group B (0.90 ± 0.05 and 1.21 ± 0.07, P < 0.001). (b) The uterine artery RI. With no statistical difference in the RI between the two groups before treatment (0.70 ± 0.05 and 0.71 ± 0.06, P > 0.05), the RI in group A after treatment was notably lower compared with that in group B (0.52 ± 0.04 and 0.66 ± 0.05, P < 0.001). (c) Uterine artery S/D. With no statistical difference in the S/D between the two groups before treatment (3.35 ± 0.10 and 3.37 ± 0.12; P > 0.05), the S/D in group A after treatment was notably lower compared with group B (2.56 ± 0.11 and 2.89 ± 0.12, P < 0.001).
Figure 2Comparison of hemodynamic changes in the fetal umbilical artery ( ± s). The abscissa represents before and after treatment. The black area is group A, and the gray area is group B. (a) The umbilical artery PI. With no statistical difference in the PI between the two groups before treatment (0.96 ± 0.05 and 0.97 ± 0.06, P > 0.05), the PI in group A after treatment was notably lower compared with that in group B (0.85 ± 0.04 and 0.92 ± 0.06, P < 0.001). (b) The umbilical artery RI. With no statistical difference in the RI between the two groups before treatment (0.70 ± 0.06 and 0.69 ± 0.05, P > 0.05), the RI in group A after treatment was notably lower compared with that in group B (0.55 ± 0.06 and 0.63 ± 0.04, P < 0.001). (c) Umbilical artery S/D. With no statistical difference in the S/D between the two groups before treatment (2.67 ± 0.15 and 2.68 ± 0.14, P > 0.05), the S/D in group A after treatment was notably lower compared with that in group B (2.48 ± 0.15 and 2.59 ± 0.12, P < 0.001).
Comparison of cardiopulmonary function indexes ( ± s).
| Indexes | Group A | Group B |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oxygen saturation (%) | Before treatment | 85.45 ± 5.98 | Before treatment | 84.98 ± 5.45 | 0.450 | 0.654 |
| After treatment | 97.68 ± 5.41 | After treatment | 90.22 ± 5.24 | 7.672 | <0.001 | |
|
| 11.748 |
| 5.369 | |||
|
| <0.001 |
| <0.001 | |||
|
| ||||||
| Arterial oxygen partial pressure (mmHg) | Before treatment | 49.21 ± 4.23 | Before treatment | 49.36 ± 4.25 | 0.194 | 0.847 |
| After treatment | 62.65 ± 4.25 | After treatment | 53.65 ± 4.21 | 11.654 | <0.001 | |
|
| 17.362 |
| 5.555 | |||
|
| <0.001 |
| <0.001 | |||
|
| ||||||
| D-dimer (mg/L) | Before treatment | 2.05 ± 0.15 | Before treatment | 2.06 ± 0.17 | 0.342 | 0.733 |
| After treatment | 1.78 ± 0.12 | After treatment | 1.89 ± 0.14 | 4.621 | <0.001 | |
|
| 10.887 |
| 5.979 | |||
|
| <0.001 |
| <0.001 | |||
|
| ||||||
| NT-proBNP (pg/ml) | Before treatment | 1100.65 ± 150.56 | Before treatment | 1115.65 ± 149.65 | 0.547 | 0.585 |
| After treatment | 342.58 ± 40.68 | After treatment | 500.15 ± 50.23 | 18.883 | <0.001 | |
|
| 37.651 |
| 30.203 | |||
|
| <0.001 |
| <0.001 | |||
Comparison of pregnancy outcomes [n (%)].
| Outcomes | Group A ( | Group B ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fetal pregnancy outcomes | ||||
| Low birth weight | 3 (5.0) | 7 (11.7) | 1.746 | 0.186 |
| Neonatal asphyxia | 5 (8.3) | 10 (16.7) | 1.905 | 0.168 |
| Premature delivery | 6 (10.0) | 10 (16.7) | 1.154 | 0.283 |
| Death | 2 (3.3) | 5 (8.3) | 1.365 | 0.243 |
| Fetal distress | 3 (5.0) | 10 (16.7) | 4.227 | 0.040 |
| Premature rupture of membranes | 5 (8.3) | 6 (10.0) | 0.100 | 0.752 |
| Total | 24 (40.0) | 48 (80.0) | 20.000 | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
| Patient pregnancy outcomes | ||||
| Polyhydramnios | 2 (3.3) | 8 (13.3) | 3.927 | 0.048 |
| Postpartum hemorrhage | 5 (8.3) | 8 (13.3) | 0.776 | 0.378 |
| Death | 0 (0.0) | 2 (3.3) | 2.034 | 0.154 |
| Caesarean section | 20 (33.3) | 30 (50.0) | 3.429 | 0.064 |
| Total | 27 (45.0) | 48 (80.0) | 15.680 | <0.001 |