David H Ilson1. 1. Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review studies from 2020 to 2021 in esophagogastric cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: After up front D2 gastrectomy for lymph node-positive gastric cancer, 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin achieved superior disease-free survival (DFS) compared with 1 year of S-1. The addition of adjuvant radiotherapy, however, added no benefit. After chemoradiotherapy and surgery in esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer, in patients with residual disease found at surgery, 1 year of adjuvant nivolumab substantially improved DFS compared with observation alone, leading to regulatory approval for adjuvant nivolumab. In metastatic esophagogastric cancer, the addition of either pembrolizumab or nivolumab to first-line chemotherapy improved response, disease free, and overall survival with the greatest survival benefit dependent on programmed death receptor ligand, programmed death receptor ligand -1 status, leading to regulatory approval for these agents. A preliminary report of a phase 3 trial adding pembrolizumab to first-line chemotherapy with trastuzumab in HER2-positive gastric cancer reported a significant improvement in response, leading to regulatory approval for pembrolizumab. The fibroblast growth factor receptor appears to be a promising new target in gastroesophageal cancer based on phase 2 data for bemarituzumab. SUMMARY: Optimal adjuvant chemotherapy after D2 resection of node-positive gastric cancer is 6 months of a fluorinated pyrimidine and oxaliplatin, with no benefit for adjuvant radiotherapy. Adjuvant nivolumab after resection of esophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy improves DFS and is a new care standard. Pembrolizumab added to first-line chemotherapy in both HER2-positive and negative esophagogastric cancer improves outcome and is a new standard of care. Nivolumab added to first-line chemotherapy in HER2-negative gastric cancer improves treatment outcome and is a new care standard.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review studies from 2020 to 2021 in esophagogastric cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: After up front D2 gastrectomy for lymph node-positive gastric cancer, 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin achieved superior disease-free survival (DFS) compared with 1 year of S-1. The addition of adjuvant radiotherapy, however, added no benefit. After chemoradiotherapy and surgery in esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer, in patients with residual disease found at surgery, 1 year of adjuvant nivolumab substantially improved DFS compared with observation alone, leading to regulatory approval for adjuvant nivolumab. In metastatic esophagogastric cancer, the addition of either pembrolizumab or nivolumab to first-line chemotherapy improved response, disease free, and overall survival with the greatest survival benefit dependent on programmed death receptor ligand, programmed death receptor ligand -1 status, leading to regulatory approval for these agents. A preliminary report of a phase 3 trial adding pembrolizumab to first-line chemotherapy with trastuzumab in HER2-positive gastric cancer reported a significant improvement in response, leading to regulatory approval for pembrolizumab. The fibroblast growth factor receptor appears to be a promising new target in gastroesophageal cancer based on phase 2 data for bemarituzumab. SUMMARY: Optimal adjuvant chemotherapy after D2 resection of node-positive gastric cancer is 6 months of a fluorinated pyrimidine and oxaliplatin, with no benefit for adjuvant radiotherapy. Adjuvant nivolumab after resection of esophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy improves DFS and is a new care standard. Pembrolizumab added to first-line chemotherapy in both HER2-positive and negative esophagogastric cancer improves outcome and is a new standard of care. Nivolumab added to first-line chemotherapy in HER2-negative gastric cancer improves treatment outcome and is a new care standard.
Authors: Yelena Y Janjigian; Steven B Maron; Walid K Chatila; Brittanie Millang; Shweta S Chavan; Carly Alterman; Joanne F Chou; Michal F Segal; Marc Z Simmons; Parisa Momtaz; Marina Shcherba; Geoffrey Y Ku; Alice Zervoudakis; Elizabeth S Won; David P Kelsen; David H Ilson; Rebecca J Nagy; Richard B Lanman; Ryan N Ptashkin; Mark T A Donoghue; Marinela Capanu; Barry S Taylor; David B Solit; Nikolaus Schultz; Jaclyn F Hechtman Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2020-05-18 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Se Hoon Park; Do Hoon Lim; Tae Sung Sohn; Jeeyun Lee; Dae Young Zang; Seung Tae Kim; Jung Hoon Kang; Sung Yong Oh; In Gyu Hwang; Jun Ho Ji; Dong Bok Shin; Jeong Il Yu; Kyoung-Mee Kim; Ji Yeong An; Min Gew Choi; Jun Ho Lee; Sung Kim; Jung Yong Hong; Joon Oh Park; Young Suk Park; Ho Yeong Lim; Jae Moon Bae; Won Ki Kang Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2020-12-02 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Ronan J Kelly; Jaffer A Ajani; Jaroslaw Kuzdzal; Thomas Zander; Eric Van Cutsem; Guillaume Piessen; Guillermo Mendez; Josephine Feliciano; Satoru Motoyama; Astrid Lièvre; Hope Uronis; Elena Elimova; Cecile Grootscholten; Karen Geboes; Syed Zafar; Stephanie Snow; Andrew H Ko; Kynan Feeney; Michael Schenker; Piotr Kocon; Jenny Zhang; Lili Zhu; Ming Lei; Prianka Singh; Kaoru Kondo; James M Cleary; Markus Moehler Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kohei Shitara; Eric Van Cutsem; Yung-Jue Bang; Charles Fuchs; Lucjan Wyrwicz; Keun-Wook Lee; Iveta Kudaba; Marcelo Garrido; Hyun Cheol Chung; Jeeyun Lee; Hugo Raul Castro; Wasat Mansoor; Maria Ignez Braghiroli; Nina Karaseva; Christian Caglevic; Luis Villanueva; Eray Goekkurt; Hironaga Satake; Peter Enzinger; Maria Alsina; Al Benson; Joseph Chao; Andrew H Ko; Zev A Wainberg; Uma Kher; Sukrut Shah; S Peter Kang; Josep Tabernero Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 31.777