Literature DB >> 33789008

Adjuvant Nivolumab in Resected Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer.

Ronan J Kelly1, Jaffer A Ajani1, Jaroslaw Kuzdzal1, Thomas Zander1, Eric Van Cutsem1, Guillaume Piessen1, Guillermo Mendez1, Josephine Feliciano1, Satoru Motoyama1, Astrid Lièvre1, Hope Uronis1, Elena Elimova1, Cecile Grootscholten1, Karen Geboes1, Syed Zafar1, Stephanie Snow1, Andrew H Ko1, Kynan Feeney1, Michael Schenker1, Piotr Kocon1, Jenny Zhang1, Lili Zhu1, Ming Lei1, Prianka Singh1, Kaoru Kondo1, James M Cleary1, Markus Moehler1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No adjuvant treatment has been established for patients who remain at high risk for recurrence after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer.
METHODS: We conducted CheckMate 577, a global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial to evaluate a checkpoint inhibitor as adjuvant therapy in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer. Adults with resected (R0) stage II or III esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer who had received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and had residual pathological disease were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive nivolumab (at a dose of 240 mg every 2 weeks for 16 weeks, followed by nivolumab at a dose of 480 mg every 4 weeks) or matching placebo. The maximum duration of the trial intervention period was 1 year. The primary end point was disease-free survival.
RESULTS: The median follow-up was 24.4 months. Among the 532 patients who received nivolumab, the median disease-free survival was 22.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.6 to 34.0), as compared with 11.0 months (95% CI, 8.3 to 14.3) among the 262 patients who received placebo (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.69; 96.4% CI, 0.56 to 0.86; P<0.001). Disease-free survival favored nivolumab across multiple prespecified subgroups. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events that were considered by the investigators to be related to the active drug or placebo occurred in 71 of 532 patients (13%) in the nivolumab group and 15 of 260 patients (6%) in the placebo group. The trial regimen was discontinued because of adverse events related to the active drug or placebo in 9% of the patients in the nivolumab group and 3% of those in the placebo group.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer who had received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, disease-free survival was significantly longer among those who received nivolumab adjuvant therapy than among those who received placebo. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; CheckMate 577 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02743494.).
Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33789008     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2032125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  133 in total

Review 1.  Signaling pathways and their potential therapeutic utility in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  L K Kadian; M Arora; C P Prasad; R Pramanik; S S Chauhan
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Immunoradiotherapy goes club(bing).

Authors:  Ralph R Weichselbaum; Sean P Pitroda
Journal:  Nat Cancer       Date:  2021-09

Review 3.  Update on Management of Squamous Cell Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  John K Waters; Scott I Reznik
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  The Impact of Tumor Regression on Prognosis After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Surgically Treated Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  D J Crull; M C H Hogenes; R Hoekstra; E M Hendriksen; M J van Det; E A Kouwenhoven
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Comparison of efficacy and safety between pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy and simple chemotherapy in neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Zibin Liang; Xiaojian Li; Bingjiang Huang; Haiyan Shi; Xiaohua Gong; Jing Yu; Caixia Xiao; Bin Zhou
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-10

6.  Role of surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with lymph node positive locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma: a national cancer database analysis.

Authors:  Hirva Mamdani; Thomas Birdas; Shadia I Jalal
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-10

Review 7.  Clinical trial data and emerging immunotherapeutic strategies: hormone receptor-positive, HER2- negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Matthew R Kearney; Julia E McGuinness; Kevin Kalinsky
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 8.  [Modern concepts of systemic treatment for adjuvant and palliative treatment of locally advanced or metastasized esophageal cancer].

Authors:  Sylvie Lorenzen; Anke Reinacher-Schick; Michael Masetti
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  ASO Author Reflections: Improvement of Esophageal Cancer Staging by Implementing Mandard Tumor Regression Score.

Authors:  D J Crull; M C H Hogenes; R Hoekstra; E M Hendriksen; M J van Det; E A Kouwenhoven
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy Versus Surgery Alone for Stage IIB-III Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Wenjie Ni; Shufei Yu; Zefen Xiao; Zongmei Zhou; Dongfu Chen; Qinfu Feng; Jun Liang; Jima Lv; Shugeng Gao; Yousheng Mao; Qi Xue; Kelin Sun; Xiangyang Liu; Dekang Fang; Jian Li; Dali Wang; Jun Zhao; Yushun Gao
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-08-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.