Literature DB >> 34455482

Influencing factors of treatment and prognosis perceptions among advanced cancer patients: a cross-sectional study.

Bo Hu1, Xiaomeng Yin2, Chunyan Du3, Hui Zhu3, Zhanjun Gao4, Xiuli Zhu4, Jizhe Wang5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to investigate the status and significantly influencing factors of treatment and prognosis perceptions among advanced cancer patients based on patient-reported outcome.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at two tertiary A general hospitals. From June to September 2019, 300 patients were invited and 292 of them participated in this study. Except for 9 invalid questionnaires, 283 pen-paper questionnaires including sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, Chinese Version of Prognosis and Treatment Perception Questionnaire, Herth Hope Index, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were well completed. Descriptive analysis, Pearson's correlation test, logistic regression analysis, and multiple linear regression analysis were applied for analysis.
RESULTS: One hundred seventy-five (61.8%) advanced cancer patients reported inaccurate treatment perception. Prognosis perception scored 87.9 ± 13.72 indicating a middle level of prognosis perception. Fourteen (4.9%), 138 (48.8%), and 131 (46.3%) patients presented low, middle, and high prognosis perception levels, respectively. In patients, without spouse and religion beliefs, received chemoradiotherapy, diagnosed as cancer equal to or less than 1 year, and higher hope level were inaccurate treatment perception's risk factors. Younger age, longer diagnosis time, higher educational level, less support for medical expenses payment, receiving chemoradiotherapy, and lower hope level but more anxiety and depression symptoms were positive predictors of prognosis perception.
CONCLUSIONS: A majority of advanced cancer patients in this study reported inaccurate treatment and middle level of prognosis perception influencing by objective and subjective factors. Clinical interventions could be developed referring these impacting factors originating from patient-reported outcome.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced cancer; Anxiety symptom; Depression symptom; Hope; Patient-reported outcome; Treatment and prognosis perceptions

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34455482     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06516-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.359


  37 in total

Review 1.  Conceptualizing prognostic awareness in advanced cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Allison J Applebaum; Elissa A Kolva; Julia R Kulikowski; Jordana D Jacobs; Antonio DeRosa; Wendy G Lichtenthal; Megan E Olden; Barry Rosenfeld; William Breitbart
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2013-10-24

2.  Outcomes of Prognostic Disclosure: Associations With Prognostic Understanding, Distress, and Relationship With Physician Among Patients With Advanced Cancer.

Authors:  Andrea C Enzinger; Baohui Zhang; Deborah Schrag; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Patient-Generated Health Data in the Clinic.

Authors:  Nirusha Jeevanandan; Christian Nøhr
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2020-06-16

4.  Predicting symptoms of anxiety and depression in patients living with advanced cancer: the differential roles of hope and optimism.

Authors:  Ian C Fischer; Larry D Cripe; Kevin L Rand
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Coping and Prognostic Awareness in Patients With Advanced Cancer.

Authors:  Ryan D Nipp; Joseph A Greer; Areej El-Jawahri; Samantha M Moran; Lara Traeger; Jamie M Jacobs; Juliet C Jacobsen; Emily R Gallagher; Elyse R Park; David P Ryan; Vicki A Jackson; William F Pirl; Jennifer S Temel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Perception of Curability Among Advanced Cancer Patients: An International Collaborative Study.

Authors:  Sriram Yennurajalingam; Luis Fernando Rodrigues; Omar Shamieh; Colombe Tricou; Marilène Filbet; Kyaw Naing; Akhileshwaran Ramaswamy; Pedro Emilio Perez-Cruz; Mary Jocelyn S Bautista; Sofia Bunge; Mary Ann Muckaden; Vikash Sewram; Sarah Fakrooden; Antonio Noguera-Tejedor; Shobha S Rao; Diane Liu; Minjeong Park; Janet L Williams; Zhanni Lu; Hilda Cantu; David Hui; Suresh K Reddy; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-11-20

Review 7.  Prognostic value of patient-reported outcomes from international randomised clinical trials on cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Justyna Mierzynska; Claire Piccinin; Madeline Pe; Francesca Martinelli; Carolyn Gotay; Corneel Coens; Murielle Mauer; Alexander Eggermont; Mogens Groenvold; Kristin Bjordal; Jaap Reijneveld; Galina Velikova; Andrew Bottomley
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 8.  Patient-reported outcomes in cancer care - hearing the patient voice at greater volume.

Authors:  Thomas W LeBlanc; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  Preferences regarding disclosure of prognosis and end-of-life care: A survey of cancer patients with advanced disease in a lower-middle-income country.

Authors:  Waleed Zafar; Haroon Hafeez; Arif Jamshed; Mazhar Ali Shah; Ainul Quader; M Aasim Yusuf
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 4.762

10.  Prognostic awareness, prognostic communication, and cognitive function in patients with malignant glioma.

Authors:  Eli L Diamond; Holly G Prigerson; Denise C Correa; Anne Reiner; Katherine Panageas; Maria Kryza-Lacombe; Justin Buthorn; Elizabeth C Neil; Alex M Miller; Lisa M DeAngelis; Allison J Applebaum
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 12.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.