| Literature DB >> 34455463 |
Javeria Tariq1, Tulika Chatterjee2, Laura Andreoli3, Latika Gupta4.
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 virus is known to mediate attack via ACE-2 Receptor, thus having adverse effects on cardiovascular, respiratory, digestive and reproductive systems, the latter being an area of emerging concern, due to the associated impact on fertility, with potential for an outsized effect on population distribution and socioeconomic road map in subsequent years. This narrative review aims to put forth the current evidence of effect of SARS-CoV-2 on human fertility from a multipronged immunologic, haematologic, and gynaecologic perspective; highlighting the areas of contradiction and potential future measures. A literature search was conducted through the MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases to identify articles on the subject in English. Relevant information was extracted from around 300 articles for this review. The existing data give non-conclusive evidence about the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on fertility; however, a greater impact on male fertility as compared to females merits further exploration. However, reproduction and fertility is a key concern and considering the pandemic is prolonged, natural conception or ART require extra precautions.Entities:
Keywords: Autoimmunity; COVID-19; Female fertility; Male fertility; Sexual/vertical transmission
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34455463 PMCID: PMC8402971 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-021-04977-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rheumatol Int ISSN: 0172-8172 Impact factor: 2.631
Covid-19 and its effects of fertility
| Author | Disease state | Sample type | Findings | Limitations | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COVID-19 and female fertility | |||||
| Ding et al. [ | 78 | Blood | Alteration of ovarian reserve (3.2% decrease in AMH, 14.3% rise in Testosterone, 20.7% rise in Prolactin) in COVID-19-infected women as compared to healthy counterparts | Hormone levels were not collected at the same time in menstrual cycle Limited sample size Some older peri-menopausal women with already fluctuating hormonal levels The casual relation between COVID-19 and hormonal markers is not clear | |
| Li et al. [ | 237 | 90 = severely ill 147 = mild infection | Blood | No changes in sex hormones and AMH Changes in menstrual cycle and volume observed (20% had decreased volume, 19% had delayed cycle) | Absent menstrual history of some patients due to retrospective study design Hormone levels were not followed up after recovery No biopsy of ovary to confirm presence of virus |
| COVID-19 and male fertility | |||||
| Li et al. [ | 38 | 23 = recovered 15 = acute stage | Semen | RT-PCR was positive for SARS-CoV-2 in 15.8% patients | Small sample size and short follow-up Different co-morbid |
| Ning et al. [ | 17 | 9 = positive 8 = negative | Semen | None of the patients was positive for N gene and ORF1ab gene | Small sample size and short follow-up |
| Holtmann et al. [ | 18 | 16 = recovered 2 = active infection | Semen | RT-PCR was negative for SARS-CoV-2 Impaired quality of sperm in those with active infection 7% patients had scrotal discomfort | Small sample size No semen analysis before infection Medication used for COVID-19 might have a confounding effect on findings |
| Pan et al. [ | 34 | Semen | 19% had discomfort in scrotum during infection RT-PCR was negative for SARS-CoV-2 Sparse expression of ACE-2 and TMPRSS2 | Small sample size Semen quality was not assessed | |
| Guo et al. [ | 23 | 11 = recovered 12 = acute infection | Semen | RT-PCR was negative for SARS-CoV-2 No effect on sperm motility, morphology and concentration | Small sample size |
| Pavone et al. [ | 9 | Semen | RT-PCR was negative for SARS-CoV-2 | Small sample size Severely infected patients were not included | |
| Kayaslaan et al. [ | 16 | Acute infection (hospitalized) | Semen | RT-PCR was negative for SARS-CoV-2 | |
| Paoli et al. [ | 1 | Semen and Urine | RT-PCR was negative for SARS-CoV-2 | Case report | |
| Song et al. [ | 13 | 12 = recovery stage 1 = acute stage | Semen and testes | RT-PCR was negative for SARS-CoV-2 | Small sample size |
| Zhang et al. [ | 10 | Prostatic secretion | RT-PCR was negative for SARS-CoV-2 | Variation in days for collection of sample | |
| Li et al. [ | 29 | 23 = recovering inpatients 6 = deceased | Autopsy of epididymis and testicular specimen And Semen | -Interstitial edema, congestion and red blood cell exudation in testes -Higher number of apoptotic cells in seminiferous tubules as compared to healthy counterparts -Oligozoospermia in 39.1% -Marked leukocytosis in semen of 60.9% -Impaired spermatogenesis with decreased sperm concentration -Increased seminal levels on IL-6, TNF-alpha | Small sample size Prospective evaluation of patients could not be done |
| Rastrelli et al. [ | 31 | Blood | Total and free testosterone levels were lower in those with severe COVID-19 infection | ||
| Ma et al. [ | 81 | Blood | Markedly raised LH levels, and decreased ratio of FSH: LH and Testosterone: LH were noticed in infected patients as compared to the non-infected group | Pre-print | |
| Schroeder et al. [ | (Not specified) | Critically-ill | Blood | Males had significantly lower testosterone and dihydrotestosterone levels as compared to females and their healthy counterparts | Pre-print |
| Guo et al. [ | 41 | Recovered patients after 56 days of hospital discharge | Semen | Total sperm count, sperm concentration and motility was significantly decreased as compared to controls; but showed improvement in next sampling after a further 29 days | Pre-COVID infection sperm parameters of the participants were not available for comparison Small sample size |
Fig. 1Covid-19 and fertility—an immunologic basis