Literature DB >> 32379329

Clinical Characteristics and Results of Semen Tests Among Men With Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Diangeng Li1,2, Meiling Jin2,3, Pengtao Bao4, Weiguo Zhao4, Shixi Zhang5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32379329      PMCID: PMC7206502          DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

In December 2019, an outbreak of pneumonia associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) occurred in Wuhan, China, and rapidly spread to other parts of China and overseas.[1] It has been confirmed that COVID-19 has the characteristic of human-to-human transmission, mainly through respiratory droplets and contact. Other routes require further verification. The virus responsible for COVID-19, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been detected in stool, gastrointestinal tract, saliva, and urine samples.[2] However, little is known about SARS-CoV-2 in semen.

Methods

This cohort study was performed after patients gave written informed consent for research purposes, and in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration[3] with the approval of the ethics committee of Shangqiu Municipal Hospital, Shangqiu, China. This study is reported following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline. We identified all male patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 aged 15 years and older between January 26, 2020, and February 16, 2020, in Shangqiu Municipal Hospital, which is the only designated hospital for the treatment of COVID-19 in Shangqiu, in the east of Henan province. Following guidance from the World Health Organization,[4] laboratory confirmation for COVID-19 was defined as positive result for SARS-CoV-2 in real-time reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction assay of nasal and pharyngeal swabs.[1] Enrolled patients were asked to provide a semen sample for SARS-CoV-2 testing. Groups were compared using the t test, χ2 test, or Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis test. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software version 19 (IBM). P values were 2-tailed, and P < .05 was considered to indicate significant differences.

Results

Among 50 patients identified, 12 patients were unable to provide a semen specimen because of erectile dysfunction, being in a comatose state, or dying prior to recruitment; therefore, a total of 38 patients were enrolled for semen testing. Of these 38 participants who provided a semen specimen, 23 participants (60.5%) had achieved clinical recovery and 15 participants (39.5%) were at the acute stage of infection. Results of semen testing found that 6 patients (15.8%) had results positive for SARS-CoV-2, including 4 of 15 patients (26.7%) who were at the acute stage of infection and 2 of 23 patients (8.7%) who were recovering, which is particularly noteworthy. But there was no significant difference between negative and positive test results for patients by age, urogenital disease history, days since onset, days since hospitalization, or days since clinical recovery. The clinical characteristics of patients with positive test results for SARS-CoV-2 in semen are shown in the Table.
Table.

Clinical Characteristics of Patients With Positive Test Results for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Semen

PatientaApproximate age, yaTime since onset of symptoms, dTime since hospitalization, dTime since clinical recovery, dPresence of urogenital diseaseOther comorbidity
120s62NAbNoCoronary heart disease, hypertension
220s106NAbNoCoronary heart disease
330s115NAbNoNo
440s98NAbNoNo
550s12102YesNo
630s16133NoChronic bronchitis

Abbreviation: NA, not applicable.

For the purpose of anonymity, patients are identified by number and their ages are given as approximates.

Patient was still in the acute stage of infection.

Abbreviation: NA, not applicable. For the purpose of anonymity, patients are identified by number and their ages are given as approximates. Patient was still in the acute stage of infection.

Discussion

In this cohort study, we found that SARS-CoV-2 can be present in the semen of patients with COVID-19, and SARS-CoV-2 may still be detected in the semen of recovering patients. Owing to the imperfect blood-testes/deferens/epididymis barriers, SARS-CoV-2 might be seeded to the male reproductive tract, especially in the presence of systemic local inflammation. Even if the virus cannot replicate in the male reproductive system, it may persist, possibly resulting from the privileged immunity of testes. So far, researchers have found 27 viruses associated with viremia in human semen. But the presence of viruses in semen may be more common than currently understood, and traditional non–sexually transmitted viruses should not be assumed to be totally absent in genital secretions.[5,6] Studies on viral detection and semen persistence are beneficial to clinical practice and public health, especially concerning viruses that could cause high mortality or morbidity, such as SARS-CoV-2. This study is limited by the small sample size and the short subsequent follow-up. Therefore, further studies are required with respect to the detailed information about virus shedding, survival time, and concentration in semen. If it could be proved that SARS-CoV-2 can be transmitted sexually in future studies, sexual transmission might be a critical part of the prevention of transmission, especially considering the fact that SARS-CoV-2 was detected in the semen of recovering patients. Abstinence or condom use might be considered as preventive means for these patients. In addition, it is worth noting that there is a need for studies monitoring fetal development. Therefore, to avoid contact with the patient’s saliva and blood may not be enough, since the survival of SARS-CoV-2 in a recovering patient’s semen maintains the likelihood to infect others. Our study might contribute by providing new information to the current discourse regarding COVID-19 prevention and control.
  5 in total

1.  Zika Virus Shedding in Semen of Symptomatic Infected Men.

Authors:  Paul S Mead; Nisha K Duggal; Sarah A Hook; Mark Delorey; Marc Fischer; Dana Olzenak McGuire; Heidi Becksted; Ryan J Max; Michael Anishchenko; Amy M Schwartz; Wen-Pin Tzeng; Christina A Nelson; Erin M McDonald; John T Brooks; Aaron C Brault; Alison F Hinckley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Virus in Semen and the Risk of Sexual Transmission.

Authors:  Heinz Feldmann
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Chaolin Huang; Yeming Wang; Xingwang Li; Lili Ren; Jianping Zhao; Yi Hu; Li Zhang; Guohui Fan; Jiuyang Xu; Xiaoying Gu; Zhenshun Cheng; Ting Yu; Jiaan Xia; Yuan Wei; Wenjuan Wu; Xuelei Xie; Wen Yin; Hui Li; Min Liu; Yan Xiao; Hong Gao; Li Guo; Jungang Xie; Guangfa Wang; Rongmeng Jiang; Zhancheng Gao; Qi Jin; Jianwei Wang; Bin Cao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China.

Authors:  Wei-Jie Guan; Zheng-Yi Ni; Yu Hu; Wen-Hua Liang; Chun-Quan Ou; Jian-Xing He; Lei Liu; Hong Shan; Chun-Liang Lei; David S C Hui; Bin Du; Lan-Juan Li; Guang Zeng; Kwok-Yung Yuen; Ru-Chong Chen; Chun-Li Tang; Tao Wang; Ping-Yan Chen; Jie Xiang; Shi-Yue Li; Jin-Lin Wang; Zi-Jing Liang; Yi-Xiang Peng; Li Wei; Yong Liu; Ya-Hua Hu; Peng Peng; Jian-Ming Wang; Ji-Yang Liu; Zhong Chen; Gang Li; Zhi-Jian Zheng; Shao-Qin Qiu; Jie Luo; Chang-Jiang Ye; Shao-Yong Zhu; Nan-Shan Zhong
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

  5 in total
  243 in total

Review 1.  COVID-19 and androgen-targeted therapy for prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Neil A Bhowmick; Jillian Oft; Tanya Dorff; Sumanta Pal; Neeraj Agarwal; Robert A Figlin; Edwin M Posadas; Stephen J Freedland; Jun Gong
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 5.678

2.  Rehabilitation after COVID-19: an evidence-based approach.

Authors:  Derick T Wade
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.659

3.  A Systematic Review of the Assessment of the Presence of SARS-CoV-2 in Human Semen.

Authors:  Amir Vahedian-Azimi; Leila Karimi; Somayeh Makvandi; Tannaz Jamialahmadi; Amirhossein Sahebkar
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19): Beginning to Understand a New Virus.

Authors:  Giau Van Vo; Eva Bagyinszky; Yoon Soo Park; John Hulme; Seong Soo A An
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Does SARS-CoV-2 Threaten Male Fertility?

Authors:  Amir Vahedian-Azimi; Leila Karimi; Somayeh Makvandi; Tannaz Jamialahmadi; Amirhossein Sahebkar
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 6.  COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) in Non-Airborne body fluids: A systematic review & Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hans Johnson; Megha Garg; Saran Shantikumar; Jecko Thachil; Bhavan Rai; Omar M Aboumarzouk; Hashim Hashim; Joe Philip
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2021-03-01

Review 7.  COVID-19 false dichotomies and a comprehensive review of the evidence regarding public health, COVID-19 symptomatology, SARS-CoV-2 transmission, mask wearing, and reinfection.

Authors:  Kevin Escandón; Angela L Rasmussen; Isaac I Bogoch; Eleanor J Murray; Karina Escandón; Saskia V Popescu; Jason Kindrachuk
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 8.  COVID-19: breaking down a global health crisis.

Authors:  Saad I Mallah; Omar K Ghorab; Sabrina Al-Salmi; Omar S Abdellatif; Tharmegan Tharmaratnam; Mina Amin Iskandar; Jessica Atef Nassef Sefen; Pardeep Sidhu; Bassam Atallah; Rania El-Lababidi; Manaf Al-Qahtani
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.944

9.  Predicting Drug Interactions with Human Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporters 1 and 2 Using Functional Knockout Cell Lines and Bayesian Modeling.

Authors:  Siennah R Miller; Xiaohong Zhang; Raymond K Hau; Joseph L Jilek; Erin Q Jennings; James J Galligan; Daniel H Foil; Kimberley M Zorn; Sean Ekins; Stephen H Wright; Nathan J Cherrington
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 4.436

10.  From initial segment to cauda: a regional characterization of mouse epididymal CD11c+ mononuclear phagocytes based on immune phenotype and function.

Authors:  A C Mendelsohn; L M Sanmarco; R G Spallanzani; D Brown; F J Quintana; S Breton; M A Battistone
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 4.249

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.