| Literature DB >> 34454022 |
Bryn E Willson1, Nancy A Gee2, Neil H Willits3, Lijuan Li4, Qi Zhang4, Kent E Pinkerton2, Bill L Lasley2.
Abstract
The November 2018 Camp Fire, a devastating wildfire in Northern California, occurred during the peak of breeding season for field monkeys at the California National Primate Research Center (CNPRC). Effects of environmental stressors, such as wildfires, on birth outcomes in primates, and in humans, are poorly understood. Additionally, wildfires are of growing concern due to their increasing frequency and severity. The objective was to examine the impact of wildfire smoke on fertility, timing of birth, and pregnancy loss for field monkeys. A unique case-control study to investigate birth outcomes in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) was conducted at the CNPRC. All females in the study were maintained in outdoor fields during a period of elevated ambient wildfire smoke from November 8-22, 2018. In addition to ambient air quality evaluations, the effects on fertility, timing to birth, and pregnancy loss were documented. Archival records of approximately 5,000 conceptions from the previous nine years served as control data. During the Camp Fire, ambient fine particulate (PM 2.5) levels exceeded the 24 -h National Ambient Air Quality Standard (35 μg/m 3) of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, reaching levels as high as 185 μg/m 3. A statistically significant association was observed between birth loss and the 2018-2019 CNPRC breeding season. As this wildfire event occurred during various stages of early pregnancy, an association can be inferred between early gestational exposure and increased risk of pregnancy loss.Entities:
Keywords: Air-quality; Climate; Miscarriage; Particulate; Phthalate; Primate; Smoke; Wildfire
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34454022 PMCID: PMC8824487 DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2021.08.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Toxicol ISSN: 0890-6238 Impact factor: 3.143
Pregnancy data of female rhesus macaques from ten consecutive breeding seasons 2009–2019 compared to the 2018–2019 Camp Fire-Exposed Cohort.
| Breeding Season Cohort | n | Total Confirmed Conceptions | Conception Rate | Live Births | Live Births / Total Conceptions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009–2010 | 911 | 800 | 88 % | 702 | 88 % |
| 2010– 2011 | 759 | 675 | 89 % | 582 | 86 % |
| 2011–2012 | 816 | 689 | 84 % | 628 | 91 % |
| 2012–2013 | 773 | 671 | 87 % | 621 | 93 % |
| 2013–2014 | 718 | 629 | 88 % | 574 | 91 % |
| 2014– 2015 | 803 | 621 | 77 % | 550 | 88 % |
| 2015– 2016 | 549 | 423 | 77 % | 387 | 91 % |
| 2016– 2017 | 541 | 500 | 92 % | 466 | 93 % |
| 2017– 2018 | 798 | 672 | 84 % | 608 | 90 % |
| 2018– 2019 Camp Fire-Exposed Cohort | 45 | 45 | n/a | 37 | 82 % |
The group of 45 females that conceived during the Camp Fire period.
Fig. 1.Flow chart of Camp Fire cohort birth outcomes after exposure to wildfire smoke during pregnancy.
mCG, palpation, and birth outcome data for the cohort of primates in the 2018–2019 breeding season.
| Primate Number | Sample Date | mCG (ng/mL) | Pregnant (via initial palpation) | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37329 | 4-Dec-18 | 0.056 | + | LV |
| 41403 | 11-Dec-18 | 6.875 | + | LV |
| 39656 | 11-Dec-18 | 2.572 | + | LV |
| 39656 | 11-Dec-18 | 2.572 | + | LV |
| 42740 | 4-Dec-18 | 16.152 | + | LV |
| 42217 | 11-Dec-18 | 15.392 | + | LV |
| 43294 | 4-Dec-18 | 0.112 | + | LV |
| 42048 | 11-Dec-18 | 0.267 | − | LV |
| 43480 | 6-Dec-18 | 0.429 | − | D |
| 44041 | 11-Dec-18 | 0.428 | − | LV |
| 44493 | 4-Dec-18 | 0.042 | − | LV |
| 42624 | 4-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | LV |
| 43478 | 4-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | LV |
| 43455 | 4-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | LV |
| 45315 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | D |
| 43815 | 4-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | LV |
| 45142 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | LV |
| 39761 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | LV |
| 39573 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | LV |
| 40329 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | LV |
| 41938 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | LV |
| 42606 | 4-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | LV |
| 43731 | 4-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | LV |
| 44344 | 4-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | LV |
| 40567 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | LV |
| 42552 | 6-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | D |
| 44122 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | LV |
| 44197 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | LV |
| 44366 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | LV |
| 44815 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | LV |
| 45180 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | LV |
| 41273 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | LV |
| 42327 | 4-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | LV |
| 43491 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | LV |
| 44541 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | LV |
| 44571 | 6-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | D |
| 45093 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | D |
| 41972 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | LV |
| 43871 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | LV |
| 39655 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | LV |
| 42079 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | D |
| 44449 | 4-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | LV |
| 43764 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | LV |
| 44566 | 4-Dec-18 | <0.039 | + | LV |
| 40103 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | − | D |
| 38658 | 6-Dec-18 | <0.039 | − | LV |
| 40256 | 6-Dec-18 | <0.039 | − | LV |
| 40278 | 6-Dec-18 | <0.039 | − | LV |
| 41004 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | − | LV |
| 41624 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | − | LV |
| 41782 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | − | LV |
| 41804 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | − | LV |
| 42022 | 4-Dec-18 | <0.039 | − | LV |
| 42098 | 6-Dec-18 | <0.039 | − | LV |
| 42309 | 4-Dec-18 | <0.039 | − | LV |
| 42721 | 4-Dec-18 | <0.039 | − | LV |
| 43310 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | − | LV |
| 43632 | 6-Dec-18 | <0.039 | − | D |
| 43805 | 6-Dec-18 | <0.039 | − | LV |
| 44061 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | − | LV |
| 44390 | 6-Dec-18 | <0.039 | − | LV |
| 44536 | 4-Dec-18 | <0.039 | − | LV |
| 44595 | 4-Dec-18 | <0.039 | − | LV |
| 44609 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | − | LV |
| 44832 | 11-Dec-18 | <0.039 | − | NC |
| 45340 | 6-Dec-18 | <0.039 | − | LV |
Abbreviations: + (plus = pregnant; - (minus = not pregnant; LV = Live vaginal birth, D = Demised fetus after confirmation of pregnancy, NC = No Conception.
Fig. 2.Timeline of conceptions during 2018–2019 breeding season. The frequency of total conceived pregnancies is shown for each month as it relates to the proportion that did not go on to live births.
Fig. 3.No change in seasonality or timeline of conception to live births from 2013–2019 for California National Primate Research Center outdoor primates.
Conception outcome data of female rhesus macaques exposed to the Camp Fire smoke “Camp Fire-Exposed Cohort” compared to control of 9 prior breeding seasons (2009 – 2018).
| Pregnancy Loss (% of Total) | Live Birth (% of Total) | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Camp Fire-Exposed Cohort | 8 (18 %) | 37 (82 %) | 45 |
| Control | 562 (10 %) | 5118(90 %) | 5680 |
Fig. 4.Additive model demonstrates a statistically significant trend toward pregnancy loss for the 2018–2019 breeding season (p = 0.035; when controlling for maternal age/parity status, p = 0.045).
Fig. 5.24 -h average concentrations of ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) measured at the UC Davis site by the California Air Resources Board from July 01 –December 31, 2018. Panel A demonstrates changes in the average concentration and chemical composition of submicrometer particulate matter (PM1) during the Fire event. Panel B shows the temporal transition in chemical constituents as percentages of the total PM1 mass analyzed by high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometry. Abbreviations: BBOA – biomass burning organic aerosols, with Type 1 representing fresh smoke, Type 2 representing more oxidized/aged smoke than Type 1, and Type 3 representing the most oxidized/aged smoke; HOA – Hydrocarbon-like organic aerosols that are mainly associated with vehicle emissions; OOA – oxidized organic aerosols primarily are formed through atmospheric chemical processes.