| Literature DB >> 34452544 |
Eduarda Ferreira Dos Anjos1, Poliana Cardoso Martins1, Nília Maria Brito De Lima Prado1, Vanessa Moraes Bezerra1, Patty Fidelis De Almeida2, Adriano Maia Dos Santos1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of the actions to control cervical cancer (CC) and its correlates.Entities:
Keywords: Cervical cancer; Papanicolaou Test; Primary Health Care; Quality of Health Care; Screening
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34452544 PMCID: PMC8629484 DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.8.2343
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ISSN: 1513-7368
Figure 1Hierarchical Conceptual Model of Quality Analysis of the Actions Developed in the Line of Care for Cervical Cancer Control. Abbreviations: PHC, Primary Health Care; CHA, Community Health Agents; LSIL, Low Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion; HFS, High Frequency Surgery; CC, Cervical Cancer
Sample Description and Bivariate Analyzes between D1, D2, D3 and Dimension I, II, and III Variables, Bahia, Northeast, Brazil, 2019
| Variable | Sample | CC educational, promotion, prevention, and monitoring actions | Access | Non-occurrence of HSIL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | P (%) | p-value | P (%) | p-value | P (%) | p-value | |
| Characterization and professional training (dimension I) | |||||||
| Occupation | <0.001 | 0.303 | 0.146 | ||||
| Physician | 109 (45.2) | 23.9 | 77.1 | 52.2 | |||
| Nurse | 132 (54.8) | 53.0 | 71.2 | 42.3 | |||
| Time working in the PHC of the city | <0.001 | 0.053 | 0.001 | ||||
| < 2 years | 105 (43.6) | 22.9 | 67.6 | 59.3 | |||
| ≥ 2 years | 136 (56.4) | 52.9 | 78.7 | 37.4 | |||
| Entry mechanism | <0.001 | 0.051 | 0.048 | ||||
| Indication or other | 105 (43.6) | 32.4 | 69.5 | 50.0 | |||
| Public selection | 83 (34.4) | 31.3 | 71.1 | 52.1 | |||
| Public tender | 53 (22) | 67.9 | 86.8 | 31.4 | |||
| Professional training course | <0.001 | 0.074 | 0.059 | ||||
| No | 97 (40.4) | 25.8 | 68.0 | 54.0 | |||
| Yes | 143 (59.6) | 49.7 | 78.3 | 41.0 | |||
| PHC organization and access to cytopathological examination (dimension II) | |||||||
| Team with doctor and nurse | 0.144 | 0.696 | 0.269 | ||||
| No | 13 (5.4) | 61.5 | 69.2 | 30.8 | |||
| Yes | 228 (94.6) | 38.6 | 74.1 | 47.4 | |||
| Frequency in which cytopathological examination is offered | 0.316 | 0.637 | 0.991 | ||||
| Monthly | 22 (9.9) | 27.3 | 72.7 | 44.4 | |||
| Fortnightly | 50 (22.4) | 42.0 | 80.0 | 44.9 | |||
| Weekly or more frequently | 151 (67.7) | 44.4 | 73.5 | 45.7 | |||
| Registration method | 0.367 | 0.088 | 0.024 | ||||
| Both | 98 (40.7) | 34.7 | 66.3 | 57.1 | |||
| Physical medical record (on paper) | 48 (19.9) | 42.1 | 79.2 | 35.6 | |||
| Electronic medical record | 95 (39.4) | 45.8 | 79.0 | 40.7 | |||
| Examination scheduling by CHA | 0.162 | 0.493 | 0.686 | ||||
| No | 22 (9.6) | 27.3 | 81.8 | 50.0 | |||
| Yes | 206 (90.4) | 42.7 | 75.2 | 45.5 | |||
| Examination collection by students/residents | <0.001 | 0.004 | 0.005 | ||||
| No | 197 (83.1) | 35.0 | 71.1 | 50.6 | |||
| Yes | 40 (16.9) | 65.0 | 92.5 | 25.6 | |||
| LSIL treatment performed by a nurse | 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.058 | ||||
| No | 146 (62.1) | 32.2 | 67.8 | 50.8 | |||
| Yes | 89 (37.9) | 53.9 | 85.4 | 37.7 | |||
| Assessment of cytopathological examination collection | 0.001 | 0.053 | 0.973 | ||||
| Inadequate or partially adequate | 52 (22.3) | 21.2 | 65.4 | 45.8 | |||
| Totally adequate | 181 (77.7) | 46.4 | 78.5 | 45.6 | |||
| Medical transport | 0.001 | 0.143 | 0.682 | ||||
| Never or sometimes | 69 9 (34.5) | 26.1 | 66.7 | 47.5 | |||
| Always | 131 (65.5) | 50.4 | 76.3 | 44.4 | |||
| Coordination of care and integrated services (dimension III) | |||||||
| monitoring of service trajectory | 0.016 | 0.047 | 0.058 | ||||
| Never or sometimes | 55 (23.6) | 27.3 | 65.5 | 57.1 | |||
| Always | 178 (76.4) | 45.5 | 78.7 | 41.8 | |||
| Evaluation of cytopathological and histopathological reports | 0.013 | 0.215 | 0.765 | ||||
| Partially reliable or I do not trust | 95 (40.6) | 30.5 | 70.5 | 46.6 | |||
| Totally reliable | 139 (59.4) | 46.8 | 77.7 | 44.5 | |||
| Performance of HFS | <0.001 | 0.140 | 0.313 | ||||
| Never or sometimes | 45 (29.0) | 20.0 | 75.6 | 47.5 | |||
| Always | 110 (71.0) | 56.4 | 85.5 | 38.3 | |||
CC, Cervical Cancer; HSIL, High-Grade Intraepithelial Lesion; PHC, Primary Health Care; CHA, Community Health Agent; LSIL, Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion; HFS, High-Frequency Surgery
Multivariate Analysis of Factors Correlated with “CC Educational, Promotion, Prevention, and Monitoring Actions,” “Access to Diagnostic Tests,” and “Non-Occurrence of HSIL,” Bahia, Northeast, Brazil, 2019
| Variable | CC educational, promotion, prevention, and monitoring actions | Access to diagnostic tests | Non-occurrence of HSIL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PR | 95% CI | PR | 95% CI | PR | 95% CI | |
| Characterization and professional training (dimension I) * | ||||||
| Time working in the PHC of the city | ||||||
| < 2 years | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| ≥ 2 years | 1.75 | 1.15-2.66 | 1.54 | 1.16-2.04 | ||
| Entry mechanism | ||||||
| Indication or Other | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Public selection | 0.93 | 0.62-1.40 | 1.02 | 0.85-1.23 | ||
| Public tender | 1.52 | 1.07-2.15 | 1.25 | 1.06-1.47 | ||
| Professional training course | ||||||
| No | 1.00 | |||||
| Yes | 1.49 | 1.02-2.18 | ||||
| PHC organization and access to cytopathological examination (dimension II) † | ||||||
| Registration method | ||||||
| Both | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Electronic medical record | 0.91 | 0.74-1.11 | 1.43 | 1.05-1.95 | ||
| Physical medical record (on paper) | 0.77 | 0.63-0.94 | 1.60 | 1.15-2.22 | ||
| Examination collection by students/residents | ||||||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Yes | 1.32 | 1.11-1.56 | 1.65 | 1.21-2.25 | ||
| LSIL treatment performed by a nurse | ||||||
| No | 1.00 | |||||
| Yes | 1.18 | 1.02-1.37 | ||||
| Assessment of cytopathological examination collection | ||||||
| Inadequate or partially adequate | 1.00 | |||||
| Totally adequate | 2.00 | 1.06-3.75 | ||||
| Medical transport | ||||||
| Never or sometimes | 1.00 | |||||
| Always | 1.61 | 1.04-2.48 | ||||
| Care coordination and integrated services (dimension III) ‡ | ||||||
| Akaike criteria | 3.558.913 | 4.683.768 | 3.854.261 | |||
| 2.964.822 | 4,578,194 | 3.803.587 | ||||
| 2.964.822 | 4,578,194 | 3.803.587 | ||||
CC, Cervical Cancer; HSIL, High-Grade Intraepithelial Lesion; PHC, Primary Health Care; LSIL, Low Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion. * Adjusted between the dimension I variables; † Adjusted between the dimensions I and II variables; ‡ Adjusted between the dimensions I, II, and III variables.