Literature DB >> 3444929

Human variability in susceptibility to toxic chemicals--a preliminary analysis of pharmacokinetic data from normal volunteers.

D Hattis1, L Erdreich, M Ballew.   

Abstract

The tenfold "uncertainty" factor traditionally used to guard against human interindividual differences in susceptibility to toxicity is not based on human observations. To begin to build a basis for quantifying an important component of overall variability in susceptibility to toxicity, a data base has been constructed of individual measurements of key pharmacokinetic parameters for specific substances (mostly drugs) in groups of at least five healthy adults. 72 of the 101 data sets studied were positively skewed, indicating that the distributions are generally closer to expectations for log-normal distributions than for normal distributions. Measurements of interindividual variability in elimination half-lives, maximal blood concentrations, and AUC (area under the curve of blood concentration by time) have median values of log10 geometric standard deviations in the range of 0.11-0.145. For the median chemical, therefore, a tenfold difference in these pharmacokinetic parameters would correspond to 7-9 standard deviations in populations of normal healthy adults. For one relatively lipophilic chemical, however, interindividual variability in maximal blood concentration and AUC was 0.4--implying that a tenfold difference would correspond to only about 2.5 standard deviations for those parameters in the human population. The parameters studied to date are only components of overall susceptibility to toxic agents, and do not include contributions from variability in exposure- and response-determining parameters. The current study also implicitly excludes most human interindividual variability from age and illness. When these other sources of variability are included in an overall analysis of variability in susceptibility, it is likely that a tenfold difference will correspond to fewer standard deviations in the overall population, and correspondingly greater numbers of people at risk of toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3444929     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1987.tb00479.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  9 in total

1.  The use of well-defined biomarkers (such as blood lead) in risk assessment.

Authors:  D Hattis
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 2.  Low-level chemical sensitivity: current perspectives.

Authors:  N A Ashford; C S Miller
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Methods for evaluating variability in human health dose-response characterization.

Authors:  Daniel A Axelrad; R Woodrow Setzer; Thomas F Bateson; Michael DeVito; Rebecca C Dzubow; Julie W Fitzpatrick; Alicia M Frame; Karen A Hogan; Keith Houck; Michael Stewart
Journal:  Hum Ecol Risk Assess       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.190

Review 4.  Risk assessment for neurobehavioral toxicity: SGOMSEC joint report.

Authors:  D Hattis; J Glowa; H Tilson; B Ulbrich
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  Development of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model of trichloroethylene and its metabolites for use in risk assessment.

Authors:  H J Clewell; P R Gentry; T R Covington; J M Gearhart
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Diversity Outbred Mice Identify Population-Based Exposure Thresholds and Genetic Factors that Influence Benzene-Induced Genotoxicity.

Authors:  John E French; Daniel M Gatti; Daniel L Morgan; Grace E Kissling; Keith R Shockley; Gabriel A Knudsen; Kim G Shepard; Herman C Price; Deborah King; Kristine L Witt; Lars C Pedersen; Steven C Munger; Karen L Svenson; Gary A Churchill
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  The Scientific Basis of Uncertainty Factors Used in Setting Occupational Exposure Limits.

Authors:  D A Dankovic; B D Naumann; A Maier; M L Dourson; L S Levy
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 8.  Human health risks due to consumption of chemically contaminated fishery products.

Authors:  F E Ahmed; D Hattis; R E Wolke; D Steinman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Dispelling urban myths about default uncertainty factors in chemical risk assessment--sufficient protection against mixture effects?

Authors:  Olwenn V Martin; Scholze Martin; Andreas Kortenkamp
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 5.984

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.