Literature DB >> 34448918

Prognostic value of the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Charbel El-Kefraoui1,2, Fateme Rajabiyazdi1,2, Nicolò Pecorelli3, Franco Carli4, Lawrence Lee1,2,5,6, Liane S Feldman1,2,5,6, Julio F Fiore7,8,9,10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Complications are common after colorectal surgery and remain a target for quality improvement. Lower preoperative physical functioning is associated with poor postoperative outcomes, but assessment often relies on subjective judgment or resource-intensive tests. Recent literature suggests that self-reported functional capacity, measured using the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), is a strong predictor of postoperative outcomes. This study aimed to estimate the extent to which DASI predicts 30-day complications after colorectal surgery.
METHODS: In this observational study, 100 patients undergoing colorectal resection [median age 63, 57% men, 81% laparoscopic, 37% rectal surgery] responded to DASI two weeks preoperatively. Complications were classified according to Clavien-Dindo and quantified using the comprehensive complication index (CCI). Our primary analysis targeted the relationship between preoperative DASI and odds of complications. Secondary analyses focused on 30-day severe complications, CCI, readmissions, and length of stay (LOS). We also explored the predictive ability of DASI with scores dichotomized based on a previously validated threshold (≤ 34).
RESULTS: Mean preoperative DASI was 48 ± 12. Forty-six patients (46%) experienced 30-day complications (8% severe, CCI 9.6 ± 15). Lower DASI scores were associated with higher odds of complications (OR 1.08, 95%CI 1.03-1.14; p = 0.001). Preoperative DASI was also an independent predictor of severe complications, CCI, and readmissions. The predictive ability was supported when scores were dichotomized at ≤ 34.
CONCLUSION: DASI is a significant predictor of postoperative complications after colorectal surgery. This questionnaire can be easily implemented in clinical practice to identify patients with low preoperative functional capacity and target interventions to those at higher risk.
© 2021. Société Internationale de Chirurgie.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34448918     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-06256-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  30 in total

Review 1.  Relationship between the inability to climb two flights of stairs and outcome after major non-cardiac surgery: implications for the pre-operative assessment of functional capacity.

Authors:  B M Biccard
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  The impact of complications on costs of major surgical procedures: a cost analysis of 1200 patients.

Authors:  René Vonlanthen; Ksenija Slankamenac; Stefan Breitenstein; Milo A Puhan; Markus K Muller; Dieter Hahnloser; Dimitri Hauri; Rolf Graf; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Validity of the 6 min walk test in prediction of the anaerobic threshold before major non-cardiac surgery.

Authors:  R C F Sinclair; A M Batterham; S Davies; L Cawthorn; G R Danjoux
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Lee A Fleisher; Kirsten E Fleischmann; Andrew D Auerbach; Susan A Barnason; Joshua A Beckman; Biykem Bozkurt; Victor G Davila-Roman; Marie D Gerhard-Herman; Thomas A Holly; Garvan C Kane; Joseph E Marine; M Timothy Nelson; Crystal C Spencer; Annemarie Thompson; Henry H Ting; Barry F Uretsky; Duminda N Wijeysundera
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Perioperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET): consensus clinical guidelines on indications, organization, conduct, and physiological interpretation.

Authors:  D Z H Levett; S Jack; M Swart; J Carlisle; J Wilson; C Snowden; M Riley; G Danjoux; S A Ward; P Older; M P W Grocott
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Hospital quality and the cost of inpatient surgery in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Cathryn Gust; Justin B Dimick; Nancy J O Birkmeyer; Jonathan S Skinner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Surgery, Complications, and Quality of Life: A Longitudinal Cohort Study Exploring the Role of Psychosocial Factors.

Authors:  Stephanie Archer; Anna Pinto; Sabine Vuik; Colin Bicknell; Omar Faiz; Ben Byrne; Maximilian Johnston; Petros Skapinakis; Thanos Athanasiou; Charles Vincent; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Prioritizing quality improvement in general surgery.

Authors:  Peter L Schilling; Justin B Dimick; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  The impact of postoperative complications on long-term quality of life after curative colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Sarah R Brown; Ronnie Mathew; Ada Keding; Helen C Marshall; Julia M Brown; David G Jayne
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  The effect of a postoperative quality improvement program on outcomes in colorectal surgery in a community hospital.

Authors:  C C M Marres; A W H van de Ven; P C M Verbeek; S van Dieren; W A Bemelman; C J Buskens
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.