Literature DB >> 24374539

The impact of postoperative complications on long-term quality of life after curative colorectal cancer surgery.

Sarah R Brown1, Ronnie Mathew, Ada Keding, Helen C Marshall, Julia M Brown, David G Jayne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect that complications have on patients' long-term quality of life (QoL) after curative colorectal cancer surgery.
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer surgery is a high risk, with approximately 1 in 3 patients suffering a complication. The long-term consequences of postoperative complications are important but have poorly been documented.
METHODS: The MRC-CLASICC trial (laparoscopic-assisted vs open surgery for colorectal cancer) included prospective evaluation of QoL using validated scoring questionnaires: EORTC QLQ-C30/CR38 and EQ5D. These were used to compare QoL at 3, 6, 18, and 36 months to baseline values for patients categorized into 2 groups: (i) those suffering any complication and (ii) those suffering any of 5 common complications (wound, chest, anastomotic leak, hemorrhage, and cardiac event).
RESULTS: A total of 614 of 794 CLASICC patients were suitable for inclusion. Complications occurred in 215 (35.0%) patients, including: wound complications (61, 9.9%), chest infection (50, 8.1%), anastomotic leak (27, 4.4%), hemorrhage (14, 2.3%), and cardiac event (26, 4.2%). Significant long-term differences in QoL between patients with and without complications were found for Physical and Social Function, Role Functioning, and Body Image on EORTC QLQ-C30/QLQ-CR38 analysis and Mobility, Self-care, and Pain/Discomfort on EQ5D analysis. No significant differences were seen for emotional/cognitive functioning, global QoL, financial difficulties, or future perspectives. Risk factors of age, gender, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) grade, and stoma moderated the impact of complications in the short- to medium-term QoL, but had less influence on long-term QoL.
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative complications have adverse effects on long-term QoL, particularly for Physical, Role and Social Functioning, and Body Image, as well as for Mobility, Self-care, and Pain/Discomfort. These findings should inform future preoperative counseling and health care planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24374539     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  61 in total

1.  Factors associated with failure of enhanced recovery programs after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Heung-Kwon Oh; Myong Hun Ihn; Il Tae Son; Jin Taek Park; Jaebong Lee; Duck-Woo Kim; Sung-Bum Kang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The six-minute walk test as a measure of postoperative recovery after colorectal resection: further examination of its measurement properties.

Authors:  Nicolò Pecorelli; Julio F Fiore; Chelsia Gillis; Rashami Awasthi; Benjamin Mappin-Kasirer; Petru Niculiseanu; Gerald M Fried; Francesco Carli; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Morphologic change of the psoas muscle as a surrogate marker of sarcopenia and predictor of complications after colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Marie Hanaoka; Masamichi Yasuno; Megumi Ishiguro; Shinichi Yamauchi; Akifumi Kikuchi; Michiyo Tokura; Toshiaki Ishikawa; Eiji Nakatani; Hiroyuki Uetake
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Staple line/anastomotic reinforcement and other adjuncts: do they make a difference?

Authors:  Richard Betzold; Jonathan A Laryea
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-12

5.  Survivorship care plans for people with colorectal cancer: do they reflect the research evidence?

Authors:  V D'Souza; H Daudt; A Kazanjian
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  SSAT State-of-the-Art Conference: Advances in the Management of Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Evie Carchman; Daniel I Chu; Gregory D Kennedy; Melanie Morris; Marc Dakermandji; John R T Monson; Laura Melina Fernandez; Rodrigo Oliva Perez; Alessandro Fichera; Marco E Allaix; David Liska
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Performance of da Vinci Stapler during robotic-assisted right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis.

Authors:  Craig S Johnson; Andrew Kassir; Daryl S Marx; Mark K Soliman
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-05-30

8.  Does adherence to perioperative enhanced recovery pathway elements influence patient-reported recovery following colorectal resection?

Authors:  Nicolò Pecorelli; Saba Balvardi; A Sender Liberman; Patrick Charlebois; Barry Stein; Franco Carli; Liane S Feldman; Julio F Fiore
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Integrated approach to colorectal anastomotic leakage: Communication, infection and healing disturbances.

Authors:  Cloë L Sparreboom; Zhou-Qiao Wu; Jia-Fu Ji; Johan F Lange
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Cancer is associated with intraoperative and postprocedural complications and disorders.

Authors:  Louis Jacob; Karel Kostev
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.