| Literature DB >> 34447448 |
Katayoon Karimzadeh1, Asgar Zahmatkesh2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Keywords: Anticancer; GC-MS; Persian Gulf; Red algae
Year: 2021 PMID: 34447448 PMCID: PMC8356712 DOI: 10.4103/1735-5362.319578
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Res Pharm Sci ISSN: 1735-5362
Percentage of extraction yields TPC and TFC of different extracts of red algae, L. synderiae. Data express mean ± SEM, n = 3. aIndicates no significant differences between groups, P > 0.05.
| Solvent system | Extraction yield (%) d | TPC (mg GAE/g DW) | TFC (mg QE/g DW) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methanol | 6.12 ± 0.17 | 3.6 ± 0.12a | 26.77 ± 0.26a |
| Chloroform | 5.78 ± 0.24 | 3.2 ± 0.41a | 23.81 ± 1.20a |
| Ethyl acetate | 5.52 ± 0.36 | 3.3 ± 0.35a | 27.65 ± 2.86a |
d Expressed as 100 g dry extract/g dry algae; GAE, gallic acid equivalent; TPC, total phenol content; TFC, total flavonoid content; QE, quercetin equivalent; DW, dried weight.
The chemical composition of the methanolic extract identified by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and KI.
| No. | Chemical constituents | Retention time (min) | Relative amount to total (%) | Molecular weight | Molecular formula | KI obtained | KI literature |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Diethoxydimethylsilane | 3.39 | 0.75 | 148 | C6H16O2Si | 665.9 | 678 |
| 2 | Benzyl chloride | 5.51 | 1.18 | 126 | C7H7Cl | 1096 | 1015 |
| 3 | Heptadecane | 15.60 | 3.89 | 240 | C17H36 | 1087 | 1072 |
| 4 | 2-Methyl-6- | 15.82 | 3.89 | 226 | C14H34 | 1455 | 1453 |
| 5 | Tetradecanoic acid | 17.01 | 6.87 | 228 | C14H28O2 | 1755 | 1762 |
| 6 | Tetradecanoic acid, ethyl | 17.61 | 1.95 | 256 | C16H32O2 | 1779 | 1778 |
| 7 | 2-pentadecanone,6, 10,14 tri methyl | 18.67 | 3.52 | 268 | C18H36O | 1838 | 1847 |
| 8 | Pentadecanoic acid | 18.98 | 0.98 | 242 | C15H30O2 | 1848 | 1823 |
| 9 | Dibutyl phthalate | 21.04 | 6.93 | 278 | C16H22O4 | 1974 | 1922 |
| 10 | n-Hexadecanoic acid | 21.1 | 9.81 | 256 | C16H32O2 | 1967 | 1967 |
| 11 | Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl | 21.63 | 8.34 | 248 | C18H36O2 | 1989 | 1975 |
| 12 | Oleic acid | 23.41 | 8.34 | 282 | C18H34O2 | 2095 | 2093 |
| 13 |
| 24.13 | 3.35 | 282 | C18H34O2 | 2100 | 2084 |
| 14 | Octadecanoic acid | 24.43 | 3.35 | 282 | C18H36O2 | 2112 | 2200 |
| 15 | 9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, methyl ester | 24.8 | 2.40 | 296 | C19H36O | 2178 | 2072 |
| 16 | Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate | 30.21 | 6.96 | 390 | C24H38O4 | 2450 | 2499 |
| 17 | Phthalic acid, di (2 -propyl-pentyl) ester | 30.32 | 2.40 | 390 | C24H38O4 | 2513 | 2527 |
| 18 | Squalene | 30.8 | 14.5 | 410 | C30H50 | 2835 | 2847 |
KI, Kovats index.
Fig. 1Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry chromatogram of Laurencia synderiae methanolic extract
Fig. 2Antioxidant activity of various extracts of red alga Laurencia synderiae. (A) DPPH radical scavenging, (B) ferric reducing antioxidant power assay, and (C) metal-chelating assay. Ascorbic acid and EDTA are used as standard. The data represent as mean ± SEM, n = 3. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 indicate significant differences compared to the standard. DPPH, Diphenylpicrylhydrazyl; EDTA, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.
Fig. 3Cell viability assay of HT29 cells after treatment with Laurencia synderiae within 24 h. The data represent as mean ± SEM, n = 3. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 indicate significant differences compared to the control group (concentration zero).
Fig. 4Flow cytometry charts for evaluating apoptosis induction in HT-29 cells by Laurencia synderiae methanolic extract in 24 h. (A) Control cells and (B) IC50 concentration of treated cell. Cells were stained with annexin-FITC+ and PI- staining index. Morphological changes of (C) untreated cells and (D) treated cells with IC50 dose of the methanolic extract of L. snyderiae using DAPI staining (Magnification 400x). The arrows show nuclear fragmentation and cell shrinkage with are related to the apoptotic mode of cell death. (E) DNA fragmentation of HT-29 cells treated with methanolic extract of L. synderiae(50-100 μg/mL) for 24 h observed by agarose gel electrophoresis. 1: Control, 2: HT29 cells treated with 50 μg/mL, 3: HT29 cells treated with 70.2 μg/mL, 4: HT29 cells treated with 100 μg/mL.