Literature DB >> 34447382

Mycobacterium tuberculosis Immune Response in Patients With Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Disease.

Elisa Petruccioli1, Linda Petrone1, Teresa Chiacchio1, Chiara Farroni1, Gilda Cuzzi1, Assunta Navarra2, Valentina Vanini1,3, Umberto Massafra4, Marianna Lo Pizzo5, Giuliana Guggino5, Nadia Caccamo6,7, Fabrizio Cantini8, Fabrizio Palmieri9, Delia Goletti1.   

Abstract

Subjects with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID), such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), have an intrinsic higher probability to develop active-tuberculosis (TB) compared to the general population. The risk ranges from 2.0 to 8.9 in RA patients not receiving therapies. According to the WHO, the RA prevalence varies between 0.3% and 1% and is more common in women and in developed countries. Therefore, the identification and treatment of TB infection (TBI) in this fragile population is important to propose the TB preventive therapy. We aimed to study the M. tuberculosis (Mtb) specific T-cell response to find immune biomarkers of Mtb burden or Mtb clearance in patients with different TB status and different risk to develop active-TB disease. We enrolled TBI subjects as example of Mtb-containment, the active-TB as example of a replicating Mtb status, and the TBI-IMID as fragile population. To study the Mtb-specific response in a condition of possible Mtb sterilization, we longitudinally enrolled TBI subjects and active-TB patients before and after TB therapy. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stimulated overnight with Mtb peptides contained in TB1- and TB2-tubes of the Quantiferon-Plus kit. Then, we characterized by cytometry the Mtb-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells. In TBI-IMID, the TB therapy did not affect the ability of CD4 T cells to produce interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor-α, and interleukin-2, their functional status, and their phenotype. The TB therapy determined a contraction of the triple functional CD4 T cells of the TBI subjects and active-TB patients. The CD45RA- CD27+ T cells stood out as a main subset of the Mtb-specific response in all groups. Before the TB-preventive therapy, the TBI subjects had higher proportion of Mtb-specific CD45RA-CD27+CD4+ T cells and the active-TB subjects had higher proportion of Mtb-specific CD45RA-CD27-CD4+ T cells compared to other groups. The TBI-IMID patients showed a phenotype similar to TBI, suggesting that the type of IMID and the IMID therapy did not affect the activation status of Mtb-specific CD4 T cells. Future studies on a larger and better-stratified TBI-IMID population will help to understand the change of the Mtb-specific immune response over time and to identify possible immune biomarkers of Mtb-containment or active replication.
Copyright © 2021 Petruccioli, Petrone, Chiacchio, Farroni, Cuzzi, Navarra, Vanini, Massafra, Lo Pizzo, Guggino, Caccamo, Cantini, Palmieri and Goletti.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CD27; IFN-γ; M. tuberculosis; immune-mediated inflammatory disease; tuberculosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34447382      PMCID: PMC8382688          DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.716857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Immunol        ISSN: 1664-3224            Impact factor:   7.561


Introduction

M. tuberculosis (Mtb) was estimated to be responsible for 10 million of new active tuberculosis (TB) disease cases and about 1.4 million TB deaths in 2019 (1). Almost a quarter of the world population is estimated to have TB infection (TBI) (2). However, only 5–10% of individuals with TBI will progress to active-TB disease during their lifetime (3). TB disease risk progression is higher within the first 2 years after Mtb exposure (3–6) and is strictly dependent on the efficiency of the immune system to control Mtb. Indeed, among patients with the dysregulation of the immune system, subjects with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID), such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS), have an intrinsic higher probability to develop active-TB compared to the general population (7–10). The risk ranges from 2.0 to 8.9 in RA patients not receiving therapies, and is lower in PsA and AS patients (7–11). The therapeutic strategy for IMID deeply changed thanks to the introduction of biologics drugs inhibiting specific pathway of the immune response. Briefly, we distinguish two main categories of biological drugs based on their action on tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α: anti-TNF-α agents and non-anti-TNF-α agents. The anti-TNF-α agents, mainly but not exclusively monoclonal antibodies, include infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, certolizumab pegol, and etanercept. The non-anti-TNF-α biologics include anti-Interleukin (IL)-1 anakinra, IL-6 inhibitor tocilizumab, anti-CD20 rituximab, anti-CD28 abatacept, anti-IL-12-23 Ustekinumab, anti-IL-17 secukinumab, and ixekizumab (10). Recently, tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib, a new class of synthetic drugs targeting the Janus kinases (JAKs) system, have been licensed for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (12). TB-reactivation risk associated with the JAK inhibitors seems negligible (13). However, since their recent marketing in Europe, these drugs were not investigated in the present study. Among the different biologic agents, the anti-TNF-α increases the risk to develop TB disease up to 10 times (10). Indeed, TNF-α is fundamental for the Mtb-containment, inducing the construction and maintenance of the granuloma and stimulating the phagocytic ability of macrophages (10). Moreover, in vitro studies on Mtb-infected cells demonstrated that anti-TNF antibodies such as infliximab and adalimumab inhibit T-cell activation and IFN-γ production (14). Therefore, the risk related to Mtb-reactivation is associated with the direct effect of TNF-α blocking and to the indirect inhibition of other immune mediators. Differently, biologic drugs based on inhibition of IL-1, IL-6, IL-12-IL-23, IL-17, and CD28 lymphocytes act with less consequences on the granuloma integrity (11). Therefore, the Mtb reactivation of IMID patients is due to both immune dysregulations related to the specific IMID and to the current therapeutic strategy. Before starting the biologic therapy, based on these evidences, it is necessary to diagnose TBI among IMID patients and offer them the TB preventive therapy, preferably (11). Currently, the tuberculin skin test (TST) and the interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs), such as the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) (Qiagen) and the T-Spot-TB (Oxford Immunotec), are the available commercial tests for detecting TBI (3, 15–18). Unfortunately, they have a poor predictive value for TB developing (3, 5, 15, 16, 18, 19). A recent meta-analysis reported that anti-TNF-α drugs significantly reduce the rate of positive score to IGRAs (20) and it has been demonstrated that IGRAs are falsely negative scored in RA patients with CD4 T-cell counts <650/μl and/or CD8 T-cell counts <400/μl (21). Moreover, we have recently demonstrated that that TBI-IMID had a lower IFN-γ response to QFT-Plus, with a higher proportion of results in the “uncertainty zone” (22) of QTF-plus assay compared to TBI individuals (23). Several studies demonstrated that the TBI subjects with remote Mtb exposure, re-exposed to Mtb, had a lower probability to progress to active-TB disease compared to recently Mtb-infected subjects (4, 24), suggesting that the remote TBI achieved a sort of immune control of Mtb-infection. Probably in remote TBI individuals, Mtb remains in a low replication status continuously stimulating at low grade the immune system and favouring its containment. Indeed, several studies showed a decline of IFN-γ response levels during successful therapy, a condition of low or absent bacterial load (25–27). Due to the adult age of the manifestations of IMID, the majority of TBI-IMID subjects have a remote infection usually discovered during the TBI screening proposed before starting the biologics (28). Although a remote Mtb exposure, the TBI-IMID have an intrinsic higher risk to develop the active-TB disease (7, 10). In the last decade, several reports proposed that the differentiation status and functional ability of CD4 T cells depended on the degree and length of Mtb exposure (29, 30). Therefore, the different states of Mtb-infection could be identified by the differentiation status and functional ability of T cells (31, 32). Recently, it has been demonstrated that highly activated and moderately differentiated functional Mtb-specific T cells are potential immune biomarkers to discriminate recent and remote TBI individuals (29). Active-TB status has been associated to high level of cell-activation markers such as HLA-DR (33–37) or to the loss of CD27 (38–42). In the last few years, several studies focused on the role of CD8 T cells in the Mtb-infection (32, 43–45). The CD8 T-cell response has been associated to Mtb load, showing that patients with active-TB and recent Mtb-infection have an increased Mtb-specific CD8 T-cell response (23, 25, 46–50). Moreover, decreased CD8 T-cell response during anti-TB treatment has been shown in longitudinal studies (25). Currently, few reports are available on Mtb-specific immune response characterization in TBI-IMID. In this regard, Mtb-specific T cells producing IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2 have been described in TBI-IMID patients under TNF-α antagonist therapy (51). Moreover, IFN-γ, IL-17, and IL-4 cytokines, which characterize three categories of differentiated CD4 T cells, may help distinguish the active-TB status from TBI-IMID with high specificity but low sensitivity (52). Based on these findings, we aimed to study the Mtb-specific T-cell response to find immune biomarkers of Mtb burden or Mtb clearance in patients with different TB status and different risk to develop active-TB disease, such as the TBI-IMID individuals. We enrolled TBI subjects as a model for Mtb-containment, the active-TB as a model for replicating Mtb status, and the TBI-IMID as fragile population to contextualize it in the spectrum of TB. Moreover, to study the Mtb-specific response in a condition of possible Mtb sterilization, we longitudinally enrolled TBI subjects and active-TB patients before and after TB therapy.

Material and Methods

Population Characteristics

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of “L. Spallanzani” National Institute of Infectious Diseases (INMI)-IRCCS, approval number 72/2015. Written informed consent was required to participate in the study conducted at INMI. We prospectively enrolled HIV-uninfected subjects with TBI with and without IMID and patients with pulmonary active-TB. Microbiologically diagnosed active-TB was defined based on the Mtb isolation from sputum culture. Active-TB patients were enrolled within 7 days of starting the specific TB treatment (T0) and at the end of therapy (T1). In the absence of clinical, microbiological, and radiological signs of active-TB, TBI was defined based on a positive score to QFT-Plus (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The TBI cohort included subjects with a remote infection (contact with a smear-positive pulmonary TB patient at least 3 years before the enrolment) and subjects reporting a recent contact (within 3 months). TBI subjects reporting a time of exposure between 4 months and 3 years were not enrolled (38). TBI subjects and TBI-IMID patients were enrolled before starting the specific TB preventive therapy (T0) and at the end of treatment (T1). Demographic and epidemiological information were collected at enrolment and are reported in . The information relative to the type of IMID and IMID-therapy are reported in .
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of enrolled patients.

TBI-IMIDTBIActive-TBTOTALp
N 14121339
Timing of TBI infection N (%):
  Recent 2 (14)8 (67)NA0.006*
  Remote 12 (86)4 (33)NA
Age median (IQR) 63 (54–75)37 (22–53)38 (26–42)45 (29–56)0.0002*
Sex: Female N (%) 6 (43)9 (75)6 (46)21 (53)0.2070**
Origin N (%)
West Europe 10 (71.4)6 (50)6 (46)22 (56)
East Europe 2 (14.3)5 (42)5 (38)12 (31)
Africa 1 (7.1)1 (8)0 (0)2 (5)0.5295**
Asia 1 (7.1)0 (0)1 (8)2 (5)
South America 0 (0)0 (0)1 (8)1 (3)
BCG vaccinated N (%) 4 (28.5)6 (50)8 (61.5)18 (46)0.2175**
Therapy N (%) 14 (100) ± 12 (100)13 (100) Š 39 (100)NA
H 11 (78.6)8 (66.7)18 (46.2)
H+R 3 (21.4)4 (33.3)7 (17.9)
H+R+Z+E 12 (92.3)12 (30.7)
H+R+E+quinolone 1 (7.7)1 (2.6)
Therapy duration median (IQR) 6 (4.6–6)6 (3–6)6 (6–9)NANA
QTF Plus N (%) at the time of enrolment § 0.4299**
Positive 12 (86)11 (92)12 (92)34 (87)
Negative 2 (14)0 (8)1 (8)3 (77)
Number of lymphocytes x103/μl at T0 median (IQR) §§# 1.9 (1.5–2.2)2 (1.6–2.3)1.7 (1–1.9)1.8 (1.4–2.1)0.13*
Number of lymphocytes x103/μl at T1 median (IQR) §§§# 1.6 (1.5–2.1)1.9 (1.8–2.4)2 (1.7–2.8)1.9 (1.6–2.2)0.051*
P values of the comparison of the number of lymphocytes x103/μl at T1 vs the number of lymphocytes x103/μl at T0 # 0.750.730.002

N, Number; TB, tuberculosis; TBI, TB infection; BCG, bacillus Calmette-Guérin; IQR, interquartile range; H, Isionazid; R, Rifampicin; Z, Pyrazinamide; E, Ethambutol; NA, not applicable *Kruskal- Wallis test; **Chi Square test; §All TBI and TBI-IMID patients have a QTF-Plus positive results in the past; ±One subject performed 2 weeks preventive therapy with H+R then continued with only H and therefore was included in the H-therapy group; ŠOne patient discontinued and repeated the therapy.§§Data available at T0 (or within a month) in 14 TBI-IMID, 11 TBI, 13 Active-TB; §§§Data available at T1 (or within a month) in 14 TBI-IMID, 9 TBI and 12 Active-TB; #Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test applied to compare T0 vs T1: TBI-IMID patients p = 0.75; TBI subjects p = 0.73; Active TB p = 0.002.

Table 2

Type of disease and type of therapy of TBI-IMID patients, enrolled before and after TB treatment.

Type of therapyPsoriasis(2)Psoriasic arthritis(2)Rheumatoid arthritis(4)Ankylosing spondylitis(6)Total(14)
T0T1T0T1T0T1T0T1T0T1
Biologic, N 000001**02§,# 03
Biologic + CS, N 000001+ 0001
Biologic +NSAID + ID, N 0001*000001
Biologic + NSAID, N 0000001§ 010
ID, N 1100001021
NSAID, N 0011111133
ID + CS + NSAID, N 0010000010
ID + CS, N 0000201131
ID + NSAID, N 1100000011
No therapy, N 0000112233

T0, before TB therapy; T1, after TB therapy; N, Number; ID, Immunosuppressive Drug; CS, corticosteroids; NSAID, Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug; before *Ustekinumab (anti IL-12/IL-23),**Tocilizumab (anti-IL6); +Abatacept (anti CTLA4); §Golimumab (anti TNF-α), #Etanercept (soluble receptor blocking the TNFα interaction with cell surface receptors).

Clinical characteristics of enrolled patients. N, Number; TB, tuberculosis; TBI, TB infection; BCG, bacillus Calmette-Guérin; IQR, interquartile range; H, Isionazid; R, Rifampicin; Z, Pyrazinamide; E, Ethambutol; NA, not applicable *Kruskal- Wallis test; **Chi Square test; §All TBI and TBI-IMID patients have a QTF-Plus positive results in the past; ±One subject performed 2 weeks preventive therapy with H+R then continued with only H and therefore was included in the H-therapy group; ŠOne patient discontinued and repeated the therapy.§§Data available at T0 (or within a month) in 14 TBI-IMID, 11 TBI, 13 Active-TB; §§§Data available at T1 (or within a month) in 14 TBI-IMID, 9 TBI and 12 Active-TB; #Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test applied to compare T0 vs T1: TBI-IMID patients p = 0.75; TBI subjects p = 0.73; Active TB p = 0.002. Type of disease and type of therapy of TBI-IMID patients, enrolled before and after TB treatment. T0, before TB therapy; T1, after TB therapy; N, Number; ID, Immunosuppressive Drug; CS, corticosteroids; NSAID, Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug; before *Ustekinumab (anti IL-12/IL-23),**Tocilizumab (anti-IL6); +Abatacept (anti CTLA4); §Golimumab (anti TNF-α), #Etanercept (soluble receptor blocking the TNFα interaction with cell surface receptors).

QFT-Plus Evaluation

QFT-Plus assay was performed for each patient at T0 and T1. Two TBI-IMID and one active-TB patients did not perform the T1 evaluation. QFT-Plus kits were used according to manufacturer’s instructions (53). The QFT-Plus Analysis Software (available from www.quantiFERON.com) was used to analyze raw data and to calculate the IFN-γ results in international units per milliliter (IU/ml). The software performs a quality control assessment of the assay, generates a standard curve, and provides a test result for each subject. Test results were interpreted according to manufacturer’s criteria (53). TB1 tube contained peptides designed to induce mainly a CD4 T-cell response, whereas TB2 tube contained peptides to induce both a CD4 and CD8 T-cell response (48, 49).

Intracellular Staining Assay

Intracellular staining (ICS) was performed for each patient at T0 and T1. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated using Ficoll density gradient centrifugation with the SepMate™ tubes (StemCell) and resuspended in complete RPMI-16-40 medium (Gibco, CA, USA) with 10% fetal bovine serum (PAA Laboratories GmbH, Pasching, Austria). To characterize by flow cytometry the Mtb-specific T-cell response, 1 × 106 PBMC resuspended in 1 ml of medium were dispensed in TB1, TB2, Mitogen, and Nil tubes of the QFT-Plus kit. After a 1 h incubation, PBMCs were transferred in polystyrene round-bottom tubes, and 1 μl/ml of Golgi plug (BD Biosciences, San Josè, USA) was added to inhibit cytokine secretion. Anti-CD28 and anti-CD49d monoclonal antibodies (mAb) at 2 μg/ml each were added to co-stimulate cells. Following an incubation of 16–24 h, the ICS was performed. As previously described (46), PBMCs were stained with anti-CD4 peridinin chlorophylprotein (PerCp)-Cy5.5 conjugate, anti-CD8 allophycocyanin (APC)-H7, anti-CD3 conjugate PE- cyanine 7 (Cy7), anti-IFN-γ Pacific Blue (PB) conjugate, anti-TNF-α fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), anti-IL-2 R-phycoerythrin (PE), anti-CD45RA APC, anti-CD27 Horizon V500 (all from BD Biosciences).

Flow Cytometry Data Analysis

The Mtb-specific T-cell response was characterized evaluating the frequencies of CD4 and CD8 T cells producing IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2 (). At least 100,000 lymphocytes were acquired with a FACS CANTO II (BD Biosciences). Cytometry data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Version 9.3). Background cytokine production in the Nil tube was subtracted from each stimulated condition. If the background was higher than half of the antigen-specific response, the results were scored as negative. A frequency of IFN-γ-producing T cells of at least 0.03% was considered as positive response. The cytokine profile has been evaluated only in patients with a positive total response to the Mtb stimulation using the Boolean gate function of FlowJo software. For responders, we also calculated the functional differentiation score (FDS) as previously described (29, 30) by applying the following equation:
Figure 1

Gating strategy and representative panel of Mtb-specific CD4 and CD8 T-cell response in one patient with TBI-IMID. Briefly, lymphocytes were gated according to FSC and SSC parameters, doublets were excluded (FSC-A/FSC-H), and CD4 and CD8 T cells were gated inside the CD3-T cells subset. Frequency of IFN-γ, IL-2, and TNF-α producing T cells was evaluated inside CD4 and CD8 subsets. CD45RA and CD27 proportion on Mtb-specific T cells was evaluated inside the total cytokine response. The CD45RA and CD27 gating position was decided on bulk CD4 and CD8 T-cell subsets. (A) TB2-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells; (B) Cytokine panels of CD8 T cells stimulated with NIL and MITOGEN; (C) Cytokine panels of CD4 T cells stimulated with NIL and MITOGEN. FSC, forward scatter; SSC, side scatter; TB2, peptides of TB2 tube of QFT-plus kit; MITOGEN, positive control stimulation of QFT-plus kit; NIL, unstimulated tube of QFT-plus kit.

Gating strategy and representative panel of Mtb-specific CD4 and CD8 T-cell response in one patient with TBI-IMID. Briefly, lymphocytes were gated according to FSC and SSC parameters, doublets were excluded (FSC-A/FSC-H), and CD4 and CD8 T cells were gated inside the CD3-T cells subset. Frequency of IFN-γ, IL-2, and TNF-α producing T cells was evaluated inside CD4 and CD8 subsets. CD45RA and CD27 proportion on Mtb-specific T cells was evaluated inside the total cytokine response. The CD45RA and CD27 gating position was decided on bulk CD4 and CD8 T-cell subsets. (A) TB2-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells; (B) Cytokine panels of CD8 T cells stimulated with NIL and MITOGEN; (C) Cytokine panels of CD4 T cells stimulated with NIL and MITOGEN. FSC, forward scatter; SSC, side scatter; TB2, peptides of TB2 tube of QFT-plus kit; MITOGEN, positive control stimulation of QFT-plus kit; NIL, unstimulated tube of QFT-plus kit. The phenotype as well has been evaluated only in responders, assessing the proportion of CD45RA and CD27 on the gate of CD4 T cells able to produce IFN-γ, IL-2, or TNF-α (total CD4 T-cell response). The number of CD4 and CD8 responders to TB1 and TB2 stimulation is reported in detail in .
Table 3

Number of CD4 and CD8 T-cell responders among IMID-TBI, TBI subjects, and active-TB patients, enrolled before and after TB treatment.

Stimulation and type of T-cell responseType of cytokines producedTBI-IMID(14)TBI(12)Active-TB(13)p*
T0NT1NT0NT1NT0NT1NT0T1
TB1 specific CD4 T cells Any cytokines 13(93)12(86)11(92)10(83)10(77)10(77)0.4930.878
IFN-γ 12(86)10(71)9(75)8(67)9(69)8(61)0.6410.913
TNF-α 11(78)11(78)11(92)8(67)10(77)9(69)0.6650.822
IL-2 10(71)11(78)10(83)8(67)7(54)7(54)0.2900.436
TB2 specific CD4 T cells Any cytokines 11(78)12(86)12(100)11(92)11(85)11(85)0.3401.000
CD4 IFN-γ 11(78)12(86)10(83)10(83)10(77)9(69)1.0000.610
TNF-α 10(71)12(86)12(100)9(75)9(69)9(69)0.0940.641
IL-2 9(64)9(64)10(83)7(58)6(46)8(61)0.1981.000
TB1 specific CD8 T cells Any cytokines 3(21)4(28)4(33)6(50)3(23)5(38)0.8110.552
IFN-γ 3(21)4(28)4(33)6(50)3(23)5(38)0.8110.552
TNF-α 0(0)0(0)1(8)0(0)0(0)2(15)0.3080.194
IL-2 0(0)1(7)1(8)2(17)1(8)2(15)0.5280.716
TB2 specific CD8 T cells Any cytokines 2(14)4(28)4(33)8(67)4(30)6(46)0.4810.160
CD4 IFN-γ 2(14)4(28)4(33)8(67)4(31)5(38)0.4810.145
TNF-α 0(0)1(7)1(8)2(17)2(15)4(31)0.3930.291
IL-2 0(0)1(7)0(0)2(17)1(8)1(8)0.6410.668

T0, before TB therapy; T1, after TB therapy; N, Number; *Fisher Test.

Number of CD4 and CD8 T-cell responders among IMID-TBI, TBI subjects, and active-TB patients, enrolled before and after TB treatment. T0, before TB therapy; T1, after TB therapy; N, Number; *Fisher Test.

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using Graph Pad Prism (Version 8.2.1 for Windows) and Stata (Stata 15, StataCorp. 2017. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC). The median and interquartile ranges (IQRs) were calculated for continuous measures. Kruskal–Wallis test was used for comparison among several groups. The Chi-Square and Fisher tests were used for proportions. The Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test was used to compare the different time points. Bonferroni correction was applied when appropriate.

Results

Characteristics of the Population

Thirty-nine subjects at different TB stages were enrolled. The TB-IMID patients had the higher age compared to the other groups (p = 0.0002), they included a higher proportion of remote Mtb exposed subjects compared to TBI (p=0.006), and they have a similar number of lymphocytes before and after TB therapy completion (p = 0.75, ). One TBI-IMID patient was taking biologic drugs at T0 and at T1, and four TBI-IMID patients were taking biologics at T1 (, ). Regarding the TB therapy, the majority of TBI-IMID patients received isionazid, whereas only three received isoniazid and rifampicin for 3 months; one subject received for 2 weeks isionazid and rifampicine then continued with isoniazid only. The duration of the preventive therapy regimen had a median of 6 months (). The TBI subjects showed similar lymphocyte counts before and after therapy (p = 0.73, ) and received mainly isoniazid. Finally, as expected, patients with active-TB showed a significant increase of the lymphocyte counts after TB therapy completion (p = 0.002, ) and received the standard TB regimen.
Table 4

Comparison of CD4 T-cells cytokine production according to the use of biologic drugs at T0 and T1.

Biologic agentsNAny cytokine in response to TB1Any cytokine in response to TB2
T0 mean (IQR)T1 mean (IQR)P*T0 mean (IQR)T1 mean (IQR)P*
Never90.31 (0.10–0.74)0.41 (0.14–0.50)0.7220.17 (0–0.38)0.43 (0.21–0.68)0.094
Only T00
Only T140.35 (0.24–0.50)0.26 (0.19–0.74)0.7150.39 (0.18–0.55)0.50 (0.18–0.82)0.273
T0 and T110.17 (na)0.30 (na)(na)0.12 (na)0.14 (na)(na)
Overall140.29 (0.17–0.54)0.31 (0.18–0.50)0.8500.20 (0.9–0.55)0.43 (0.15–0.80)0.032

T0, before TB therapy; T1, after TB therapy; N, Number; *Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test; na, not available.

Comparison of CD4 T-cells cytokine production according to the use of biologic drugs at T0 and T1. T0, before TB therapy; T1, after TB therapy; N, Number; *Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test; na, not available.

QFT-Plus Trend Before and After TB Treatment

In this study, the diagnosis of TBI is based on a positive IGRA and clinical and radiological parameters; therefore, the TBI-IMID and the TBI subjects have for definition a positive IGRA result. However, among the TBI-IMID patients, two patients had a negative QFT-Plus at T0 and a previously positive IGRA: one patient had a remote Mtb-infection, whereas the other one had a recent Mtb-infection and was taking an immunosuppressive drug. Among the subjects with TBI, one patient with a remote Mtb-infection had a negative QFT-Plus at T0 and a previously positive IGRA. Differently, the assumption of a positive IGRA is not a criterion for the diagnosis of active-TB disease. Evaluating the QFT-Plus response at T0 and T1, we did not observe any significant differences in any groups (), and remarkably, all patients responded to Mitogen stimulation (data not shown).

Frequency of Mtb-Specific T Cells Is Similar in Patients Enrolled Before and After TB Treatment

We evaluated the ability of CD4 and CD8 T cells to produce IFN-γ, IL-2, and TNF-α in response to TB1 or TB2 stimulation (, and ). In , we showed a representative flow-cytometry analysis of Mtb-specific T cells for each studied group. Regarding the Mtb-specific CD4 T-cell response, we did not observe significant differences in terms of number of responders before and after TB treatment in any groups (). The frequency of Mtb-specific CD4 T cells, producing IFN-γ, IL-2, and TNF-α, was similar among TBI-IMID (), TBI subjects (), and active-TB patients () at T0 and T1 with the exception of a lower frequency of TB2-specific TNF-α+ CD4 T cells at T0 compared to T1 in TBI-IMID group () and a higher frequency of TB1- and TB2-specific IL-2+ CD4 T cells at T0 compared to T1 in TBI group (). Moreover, all groups of patients produced IFN-γ, IL-2, and TNF-α in response to TB1 or TB2 stimulations ( and ). Considering the different IMID therapy of TBI-IMID (), we indicated in the graph the presence or not of an undergoing therapy with biologic drugs at each time point (). Stratifying for the presence of the undergoing biologic therapy (), we found that four patients were taking biologics only at T1, one patient at both T0 and T1, and nine patients neither at T0 nor at T1. We did not find any significant differences among TBI-IMID comparing T0 and T1 in terms of total response (production of any cytokines by CD4 T cells) (). Due to sample size, we could not stratify for type of biologic agents used and for the others IMID therapies.
Figure 2

CD4 T cells producing IFN-γ, IL-2, and TNF-α in response to Mtb antigen stimulation before and after TB therapy completion. PBMC of patients enrolled before (T0) and after TB therapy (T1) were stimulated overnight with TB1 and TB2 peptides. (A, B) TBI-IMID; (C, D) TBI subjects; (E, F) Active-TB patients. Number of responders over total enrolled patients is reported below each panel. Horizontal lines indicate the median. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test and the p value was considered significant if ≤0.05. TB, tuberculosis; TBI, tuberculosis infection; IMID, immune mediated inflammatory disease; TB1, peptides of TB1 tube of QFT-plus kit; TB2, peptides of TB2 tube of QFT-plus kit.

CD4 T cells producing IFN-γ, IL-2, and TNF-α in response to Mtb antigen stimulation before and after TB therapy completion. PBMC of patients enrolled before (T0) and after TB therapy (T1) were stimulated overnight with TB1 and TB2 peptides. (A, B) TBI-IMID; (C, D) TBI subjects; (E, F) Active-TB patients. Number of responders over total enrolled patients is reported below each panel. Horizontal lines indicate the median. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test and the p value was considered significant if ≤0.05. TB, tuberculosis; TBI, tuberculosis infection; IMID, immune mediated inflammatory disease; TB1, peptides of TB1 tube of QFT-plus kit; TB2, peptides of TB2 tube of QFT-plus kit. Regarding the Mtb-specific CD8 T-cell response, we observed a not significant higher number of responders at T1 compared to T0 in response to TB2 stimulation (). Moreover, the number of CD8 T-cell responders was lower than the number of CD4 T-cell responders (). The frequency of Mtb-specific CD8 T cells was similar among TBI-IMID (), TBI subjects (), and active-TB () patients at T0 and T1 and the responders produced mainly IFN-γ in response to TB1 or TB2 stimulations. Due to the low number of CD8 T-cell responders, we did not analyze the data according to the presence or not of biologic drugs.
Figure 3

CD8 T cells producing IFN-γ, IL-2, and TNF-α in response to Mtb antigen stimulation. PBMC of patients enrolled before (T0) and after TB therapy (T1) were stimulated overnight with TB1 and TB2 peptides. (A, B) TBI-IMID; (C, D) TBI patients; (E, F) Active-TB patients. Number of responders over total enrolled patients is reported below each panel. Horizontal lines indicate the median. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test and the p value was considered significant if ≤0.05. TB, tuberculosis; TBI, tuberculosis infection; IMID, immune mediated inflammatory disease; TB1, peptides of TB1 tube of QFT-plus kit; TB2, peptides of TB2 tube of QFT-plus kit.

CD8 T cells producing IFN-γ, IL-2, and TNF-α in response to Mtb antigen stimulation. PBMC of patients enrolled before (T0) and after TB therapy (T1) were stimulated overnight with TB1 and TB2 peptides. (A, B) TBI-IMID; (C, D) TBI patients; (E, F) Active-TB patients. Number of responders over total enrolled patients is reported below each panel. Horizontal lines indicate the median. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test and the p value was considered significant if ≤0.05. TB, tuberculosis; TBI, tuberculosis infection; IMID, immune mediated inflammatory disease; TB1, peptides of TB1 tube of QFT-plus kit; TB2, peptides of TB2 tube of QFT-plus kit. Patients of all studied groups responded to the in vitro mitogen stimulation (). Regarding the CD4 T-cell response, the TBI-IMID patients showed a higher frequency of T cells producing IFN-γ or TNF-α or IL-2 at T1 compared to T0, whereas no significant differences were observed in TBI subjects and active-TB patients (). Regarding the CD8 T-cell response, the TBI subjects showed a higher frequency of T cells producing IL-2 at T0 compared to T1, whereas no significant differences were observed in TBI-IMID and active-TB patients (). We next compared the cytokine production of Mtb-specific CD4 T cells among the different groups at each time point (); we focused on CD4 T cells since the number of CD8 T cells responders was too low to allow a robust statistical analysis (). The frequency of Mtb-specific CD4 T cells producing IFN-γ, IL-2, or TNF-α was similar in TB, TBI subjects, and TBI-IMID patients enrolled at T0 () and at T1 (). Differently, in response to mitogen stimulation, we reported a higher level of TNF-α (p = 0.0013) and IL-2 in TBI-IMID compared to TBI ().
Figure 4

Comparison of CD4 T cells producing IFN-γ, IL-2, and TNF-α in response to Mtb antigen stimulation at each time point. PBMC of patients enrolled before (T0) and after TB therapy (T1) were stimulated overnight with TB1 and TB2 peptides. (A, B) TB1 response at T0 and T1; (C, D) TB2 response at T0 and T1. Horizontal lines indicate the median. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney unmatched test, Bonferroni correction was applied, and the p value was considered significant if ≤0.017. TB, tuberculosis; TBI, tuberculosis infection; IMID, immune mediated inflammatory disease; TB1, peptides of TB1 tube of QFT-plus kit; TB2, peptides of TB2 tube of QFT-plus kit.

Comparison of CD4 T cells producing IFN-γ, IL-2, and TNF-α in response to Mtb antigen stimulation at each time point. PBMC of patients enrolled before (T0) and after TB therapy (T1) were stimulated overnight with TB1 and TB2 peptides. (A, B) TB1 response at T0 and T1; (C, D) TB2 response at T0 and T1. Horizontal lines indicate the median. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney unmatched test, Bonferroni correction was applied, and the p value was considered significant if ≤0.017. TB, tuberculosis; TBI, tuberculosis infection; IMID, immune mediated inflammatory disease; TB1, peptides of TB1 tube of QFT-plus kit; TB2, peptides of TB2 tube of QFT-plus kit.

TB-IMID Patients Had a Similar Cytokine Profile Before and After TB Preventive Therapy

We further investigated the functional cytokine profile of Mtb-specific T cells (). We focused on CD4 T cells since the number of CD8 T cells responders was too low to allow a robust statistical analysis ().
Figure 5

Functional profile of Mtb-specific CD4 T cells before and after TB therapy completion. PBMC of patients enrolled before (T0) and after TB therapy (T1) were stimulated overnight with TB1 and TB2 peptides. (A, B) TBI-IMID patients; (C, D) TBI subjects; (E, F) Active-TB patients. Cytokine profile was evaluated only on responders using Boolean gate combination. The number of CD4 and CD8 responders to TB1 and TB2 stimulation is reported in detail in . Horizontal lines indicate the median. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, and the p value was considered significant if ≤0.05. TB, tuberculosis; TBI, tuberculosis infection; IMID, immune mediated inflammatory disease; TB1, peptides of TB1 tube of QFT-plus kit; TB2, peptides of TB2 tube of QFT-plus kit.

Functional profile of Mtb-specific CD4 T cells before and after TB therapy completion. PBMC of patients enrolled before (T0) and after TB therapy (T1) were stimulated overnight with TB1 and TB2 peptides. (A, B) TBI-IMID patients; (C, D) TBI subjects; (E, F) Active-TB patients. Cytokine profile was evaluated only on responders using Boolean gate combination. The number of CD4 and CD8 responders to TB1 and TB2 stimulation is reported in detail in . Horizontal lines indicate the median. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, and the p value was considered significant if ≤0.05. TB, tuberculosis; TBI, tuberculosis infection; IMID, immune mediated inflammatory disease; TB1, peptides of TB1 tube of QFT-plus kit; TB2, peptides of TB2 tube of QFT-plus kit. In TBI-IMID group, we did not observe any significant changes comparing CD4 cytokine profile at T0 and T1 () with the exception of a decrease of the IFN-γ+ IL-2+ CD4 T-cell subset at T1 compared to T0 in response to TB2 stimulation (). The CD4 T-cell response to TB1 and TB2 was mainly characterized by polyfunctional IFN-γ+ IL-2+ TNF-α+ CD4 T cells; among the monofunctional T cells, the IFN-γ+ IL-2- TNF-α- CD4 T cells were the most representative subset (). In TBI group, we observed significant changes comparing CD4 T-cell cytokine profile at T0 and T1 (): the proportion of polyfunctional IFN-γ+ IL-2+ TNF-α+ CD4 T cells was significantly higher at T0 than at T1 in response to TB1 (p = 0.0039) and to TB2 (p = 0.0195). Differently, we reported a higher but not significant proportion of monofunctional IFN-γ+ IL-2- TNF-α- CD4 T cells at T1 compared to T0 in response to both stimuli. The proportion of the monofunctional IFN-γ+ IL-2- TNF-α- T cells in TBI subjects after TB treatment was quite higher compared to TBI-IMID at the same time point (see below for the details). In the active-TB group, we did not observe any significant change comparing CD4 cytokine profile at T0 and T1 (). In this case, the CD4 response to TB1 and TB2 was not similar. The TB1 response was mainly characterized by polyfunctional IFN-γ+ IL-2+ TNF-α+ CD4 T cells; among the monofunctional T cells, the IFN-γ- IL-2- TNF-α+ CD4 T cells and the IFN-γ+ IL-2- TNF-α- CD4 T cells were the most representative subsets (). In contrast, the TB2 response showed a low proportion of polyfunctional IFN-γ+ IL-2+ TNF-α+ CD4 T cells and an increased proportion of monofunctional IFN-γ+ IL-2- TNF-α- CD4 T cells at both time points (). It is known that Mtb-specific T cells change their functional capacity depending on antigen and bacterial load (25, 30, 31, 33). Based on these evidences, it has been proposed a single measurement of functional differentiation, FDS, of responders that describes the different type of Mtb-infection and Mtb burden (30). This analysis led us to synthetize the functional changes of T cells before and after therapy reported in . The FDS of Mtb-specific CD4 T cells before and after therapy was not significantly different between T0 and T1 in any groups of patients (). The FDS comparison at the baseline did not show any significant differences among groups (data not shown). To note that, we could not include in the FDS calculation the patients without the IFN-γ- IL-2+/- TNF-α+/- CD4+ T-cell subset (TBI-IMID T0 in response to TB1: two patients, TBI-IMID T1 in response to TB1: one patient; TBI-IMID T0 in response to TB2: one patient; TBI T1 in response to TB2: one patient; active-TB T0 in response to TB2: two patients). Since the TBI-IMID and the TBI included both recent and remote Mtb-infection, we choose to analyze again the FDS including the most represented category: remote TBI-IMID (12 patients over 14 enrolled) and recent TBI (8 patients over 12 enrolled) (). Even with this stratification, we did no observe significant differences before and after TB therapy in any studied groups. Collectively, these data suggested that the TB treatment did not deeply affect the CD4 cytokine profile of the TBI-IMID patients. Differently, the TBI subjects showed a significant decrease of triple functional T cells after treatment and the active-TB a not significant but evident increase of the proportion of monofunctional IFN-γ+ IL-2- TNF-α- CD4+ T cells (). Then, we compared the cytokine profile of Mtb-specific CD4 T cells among the different groups at each time point ( and ). In response to TB1 stimulation at T0, we did not observe any significant differences (). However, the main involved subset was constituted by the triple functional IFN-γ+ IL-2+ TNF-α+ CD4+ T cells in all groups; in active-TB and TBI-IMID, the contribution of monofunctional IFN-γ+ IL-2- TNF-α- CD4+ T cells was also evident (). Similarly, in response to TB1 stimulation at T1, we did not observe any significant differences (). In particular, we observed: in active-TB a high proportion of monofunctional IFN-γ+/- IL-2- TNF-α+/- CD4+ T cells and triple functional IFN-γ+ IL-2+ TNF-α+ CD4+ T cells; in TBI, a great contribution of monofunctional IFN-γ+ IL-2- TNF-α- CD4+ T cells; in TBI-IMID, a high proportion of monofunctional IFN-γ+ IL-2- TNF-α- CD4+ T cells and triple functional IFN-γ+ IL-2+ TNF-α+ CD4+ T cells ().
Figure 6

Comparison of functional profile of TB1 specific CD4 T cells at each time point. PBMC of patients enrolled before (T0) and after TB therapy (T1) were stimulated overnight with TB1 peptides. (A) T0; (B) T1. Cytokine profile was evaluated only on responders using Boolean gate combination. The number of CD4 and CD8 responders to TB1 and TB2 stimulation is reported in detail in . Horizontal lines indicate the median. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney unmatched test, Bonferroni correction was applied, and the p value was considered significant if ≤0.017. TB, tuberculosis; TBI, tuberculosis infection; IMID, immune mediated inflammatory disease; TB1, peptides of TB1 tube of QFT-plus kit; TB2, peptides of TB2 tube of QFT-plus kit.

Figure 7

Comparison of functional profile of TB2 specific CD4 T cells at each time point. PBMC of patients enrolled before (T0) and after TB therapy (T1) were stimulated overnight with TB2 peptides. (A) T0; (B) T1. Cytokine profile was evaluated only on responders using Boolean gate combination. The number of CD4 and CD8 responders to TB1 and TB2 stimulation is reported in detail in . Horizontal lines indicate the median. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney unmatched test, Bonferroni correction was applied, and the p value was considered significant if ≤0.017. TB, tuberculosis; TBI, tuberculosis infection; IMID, immune mediated inflammatory disease; TB1, peptides of TB1 tube of QFT-plus kit; TB2, peptides of TB2 tube of QFT-plus kit.

Comparison of functional profile of TB1 specific CD4 T cells at each time point. PBMC of patients enrolled before (T0) and after TB therapy (T1) were stimulated overnight with TB1 peptides. (A) T0; (B) T1. Cytokine profile was evaluated only on responders using Boolean gate combination. The number of CD4 and CD8 responders to TB1 and TB2 stimulation is reported in detail in . Horizontal lines indicate the median. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney unmatched test, Bonferroni correction was applied, and the p value was considered significant if ≤0.017. TB, tuberculosis; TBI, tuberculosis infection; IMID, immune mediated inflammatory disease; TB1, peptides of TB1 tube of QFT-plus kit; TB2, peptides of TB2 tube of QFT-plus kit. Comparison of functional profile of TB2 specific CD4 T cells at each time point. PBMC of patients enrolled before (T0) and after TB therapy (T1) were stimulated overnight with TB2 peptides. (A) T0; (B) T1. Cytokine profile was evaluated only on responders using Boolean gate combination. The number of CD4 and CD8 responders to TB1 and TB2 stimulation is reported in detail in . Horizontal lines indicate the median. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney unmatched test, Bonferroni correction was applied, and the p value was considered significant if ≤0.017. TB, tuberculosis; TBI, tuberculosis infection; IMID, immune mediated inflammatory disease; TB1, peptides of TB1 tube of QFT-plus kit; TB2, peptides of TB2 tube of QFT-plus kit. In response to TB2 stimulation at T0, we did not observe any significant differences (). However, in active-TB, the monofunctional IFN-γ+ IL-2- TNF-α- CD4+ T cells constituted the main involved subset, whereas in TBI and TBI-IMID the triple functional IFN-γ+ IL-2+ TNF-α+ CD4+ T cells was the major represented subset (). In response to TB2 stimulation at T1 (), we observed a high contribution of the monofunctional IFN-γ+ IL-2- TNF-α- CD4+ T cells in active-TB and TBI. In TBI-IMID, we reported a high and significant percentage of double functional IFN-γ+ IL-2- TNF-α+ CD4+ T cells compared to TBI (p = 0.0161) and a high contribution of triple functional IFN-γ+ IL-2+ TNF-α+ CD4+ T cells in TBI-IMID (). Collectively, these data indicated at T0 a predominant TB1-induced polyfunctional profile and at T1 an increase of TB1-induced monofunctional IFN-γ+ IL-2- TNF-α- CD4+ T cells in all groups (). The TB2 cytokine profile was more heterogeneous, showing that triple functional IFN-γ+ IL-2+ TNF-α+ CD4+ T cells were mainly represented in TBI-IMID patients at both T0 and T1 ().

TB Treatment Did Not Affect the Phenotype of Mtb-Specific T Cells

Next, we investigated if the TB treatment had or not an impact on the phenotype of Mtb-specific T cells, evaluating the proportion of CD45RA and CD27 (). Even in this case, we focused on CD4 T cells since the number of CD8 T cells responders was too low to perform a robust statistical analysis ().
Figure 8

Phenotype of Mtb-specific CD4 T cells before and after TB therapy completion. PBMC of patients enrolled before (T0) and after TB therapy (T1) were stimulated overnight with TB1 and TB2 peptides, and CD45RA and CD27 proportions were evaluated on total cytokine response and T cells producing IFN-γ, IL-2, and TNF-α. (A, B) TBI-IMID patients; (C, D) TBI subjects; (E, F) Active-TB patients. Phenotype was evaluated only on responders. The number of CD4 and CD8 responders to TB1 and TB2 stimulation is reported in detail in . Horizontal lines indicate the median. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, and the p value was considered significant if ≤0.05. TB, tuberculosis; TBI, tuberculosis infection; IMID, immune mediated inflammatory disease; TB1, peptides of TB1 tube of QFT-plus kit; TB2, peptides of TB2 tube of QFT-plus kit.

Phenotype of Mtb-specific CD4 T cells before and after TB therapy completion. PBMC of patients enrolled before (T0) and after TB therapy (T1) were stimulated overnight with TB1 and TB2 peptides, and CD45RA and CD27 proportions were evaluated on total cytokine response and T cells producing IFN-γ, IL-2, and TNF-α. (A, B) TBI-IMID patients; (C, D) TBI subjects; (E, F) Active-TB patients. Phenotype was evaluated only on responders. The number of CD4 and CD8 responders to TB1 and TB2 stimulation is reported in detail in . Horizontal lines indicate the median. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, and the p value was considered significant if ≤0.05. TB, tuberculosis; TBI, tuberculosis infection; IMID, immune mediated inflammatory disease; TB1, peptides of TB1 tube of QFT-plus kit; TB2, peptides of TB2 tube of QFT-plus kit. Since we did not observe differences in term of FDS and considering the low frequency of the Mtb-specific T cells, we decided to analyze the phenotype of Mtb-specific CD4 T cells able to produce any cytokines (total response based on IFN-γ, TNF-α, or IL-2 production). In this way, we had the maximum number of events available for the phenotype description, and we avoided as much as possible the interference of the background that could not be subtracted in the phenotype evaluation. In TBI-IMID and TBI subjects, the Mtb-specific CD4 T-cell response was mainly represented by the CD45RA-CD27+ subset both at T0 and T1 (with a frequency ranging from 55% to 79%) (). In TBI-IMID patients, we did not observe significant differences in response to TB1 and TB2 antigens and any evident trend (). In TBI subjects, we observed a lower proportion of Mtb-specific CD45RA- CD27+ CD4 T cells at T1 compared to T0 (p = 0.0098) in response to TB2 and a similar trend in response to TB1 (). In active-TB, the Mtb-specific CD4 T-cell response was mainly represented by the CD45RA- CD27+ subset both a T0 and T1 (with a frequency ranging from 46% to 67%) (). We observed an increased Mtb-specific CD4+ CD45RA- CD27+ subset and a contraction of the CD45RA- CD27- subset after therapy completion in response to TB1 and TB2 antigens (). The frequency of the CD45RA- CD27+ subset was significantly increased in response to TB2 (p = 0.0195, ), whereas the frequency of the CD45RA- CD27- subset was significantly decreased in response to TB1 (p = 0.0195, ). Then, we compared the phenotype profile of Mtb-specific CD4 T cells among the different groups at each time point (). In response to TB1 stimulation at T0, we found that the CD45RA-CD27+ subset was significantly lower in active-TB compared to TBI and TBI-IMID (p = 0.0021; p = 0.0027) and the CD45RA-CD27- subset was significantly higher in active-TB compared to TBI and TBI-IMID (p = 0.0058; p = 0.0041) (). Differently, at T1, we did not find any significant differences ().
Figure 9

Comparison of phenotype of Mtb-specific CD4 T cells at each time point. PBMC of patients enrolled before (T0) and after TB therapy (T1) were stimulated overnight with TB1 and TB2 peptides, and CD45RA and CD27 proportions were evaluated on total cytokine response and T cells producing IFN-γ, IL-2, and TNF-α. (A, B) TB1 stimulation at T0 and T1; (C, D) TB2 stimulation at T0 and T1. Phenotype was evaluated only on responders. The number of CD4 and CD8 responders to TB1 and TB2 stimulation is reported in detail in . Horizontal lines indicate the median. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney unmatched test, Bonferroni correction was applied, and the p value was considered significant if ≤0.017. TB, tuberculosis; TBI, tuberculosis infection; IMID, immune mediated inflammatory disease; TB1, peptides of TB1 tube of QFT-plus kit; TB2, peptides of TB2 tube of QFT-plus kit.

Comparison of phenotype of Mtb-specific CD4 T cells at each time point. PBMC of patients enrolled before (T0) and after TB therapy (T1) were stimulated overnight with TB1 and TB2 peptides, and CD45RA and CD27 proportions were evaluated on total cytokine response and T cells producing IFN-γ, IL-2, and TNF-α. (A, B) TB1 stimulation at T0 and T1; (C, D) TB2 stimulation at T0 and T1. Phenotype was evaluated only on responders. The number of CD4 and CD8 responders to TB1 and TB2 stimulation is reported in detail in . Horizontal lines indicate the median. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney unmatched test, Bonferroni correction was applied, and the p value was considered significant if ≤0.017. TB, tuberculosis; TBI, tuberculosis infection; IMID, immune mediated inflammatory disease; TB1, peptides of TB1 tube of QFT-plus kit; TB2, peptides of TB2 tube of QFT-plus kit. In response to TB2 stimulation at T0, we found a phenotype profile similar to TB1 stimulation for all groups; however, only the CD45RA-CD27+ subset was significantly lower in active-TB compared to TBI-IMID (p = 0.001) (). At T1, we observed that the TBI subjects had lower proportion of the CD45RA-CD27+ subset (p = 0.0002) and a higher proportion of CD45RA+CD27+ (p = 0.0005) compared to TBI-IMID (). Collectively, these data highlighted a loss of CD27+ CD4 T cells in active-TB patients and this profile was more evident at T0.

Discussion

Among patients with dysregulation of the immune system, subjects with IMID, such as RA, PsA, and AS, have an intrinsic higher probability to develop active-TB compared to the general population (7, 10). The risk of Mtb reactivation in the general population of TBI subjects usually is the highest during the first 2 years after Mtb exposure (3, 4, 6). According to the WHO, the prevalence of RA varies between 0.3% and 1% and is more common in women and in developed countries (7–10). Therefore, the identification and treatment of TBI in this fragile population is important to propose the TB preventive therapy (7–10). In this study, we explored the Mtb-specific immunity of TBI-IMID patients at the baseline and after TB therapy completion. The main finding of this study regards the CD4 T-cell response. We demonstrate in TBI-IMID that TB therapy did not affect the ability of CD4 T cells to produce IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2, their functional status, and their phenotype. Moreover, we demonstrated that at the baseline TBI subjects and TBI-IMID patients had a similar phenotype that instead was different from active-TB patients. We enrolled two different categories of controls: the TBI without IMID to study the Mtb-specific immune response in a population controlling the Mtb replication and the active-TB group as a positive control of the ongoing Mtb replication. TB treatment did not significantly affect the CD4 cytokine production neither in the TBI nor in the active-TB group. As previously demonstrated, the CD8 T-cell response was detected in lower proportion compared to the CD4 T-cell response (48, 50). The CD4 functional status in TBI subjects showed a significant decrease of triple functional T cells after treatment and in active-TB a not significant increase of the proportion of monofunctional IFN-γ+ IL-2- TNF-α-. The baseline level of polyfunctional IFN-γ+ IL-2+ TNF-α+ CD4 T cells in both TBI-IMID and TBI was similar to the results reported in other TBI population (29, 31, 47). The comparison among groups at each time point confirmed as shown by the pair-wise comparison that at T0 all the studied groups had a similar cytokine profile mainly constituted by the triple functional IFN-γ+ IL-2+ TNF-α+ CD4 T-cell subset and at T1 all groups had a notable proportion of monofunctional IFN-γ+ IL-2- TNF-α- CD4 T cells. Since it has been demonstrated that recent and remote TBI subjects, naïve for TB therapy, had a similar CD4 cytokine profile (29), the functional differences after TB therapy between TBI and TBI-IMID individuals were not ascribable to their remote or recent Mtb exposure but probably to the IMID status itself. TB therapy did not affect neither the functional differentiation status of CD4 T cells in the TBI, TBI-IMID, and active-TB groups. Considering that the majority of TBI had a recent infection and the majority of TBI-IMID had a remote exposure, our data were in line with recent findings on recent subsets and persistent QFT+ individuals (29). In active-TB, the baseline functional status of TB1 CD4-specific T cells was in agreement with previous reports reporting a high proportion of the IFN-γ+ IL-2+ TNF-α+ CD4 T-cell subset in response to ESAT-6 CFP-10 stimulation (25, 31, 54). For the TB2 stimulation, the functional status skewed towards the IFN-γ+ IL-2- TNF-α- CD4 T cells, maybe as a consequence of the ability of TB2 peptides to stimulate also the CD8 T cells (48). T-cell expression of surface molecules such as CD45RA, CD27, and CCR7 identifies different T-cell subsets that reflect different stages of cell differentiation (55). The effector T cells are expanded during active-Mtb replication, whereas the memory cells associate with control and eradication of Mtb-infection (31, 47, 56). The phenotype characterization demonstrated a great contribution of the CD45RA- CD27+ subset to the Mtb-specific immune response in all groups. The presence of CD27 could be associated to both central memory (CD45RA- CD27+ CCR7+) and effector memory subsets (CD45RA- CD27+ CCR7-) (29, 55). Since we did not evaluate the CCR7 expression, we could not assign a precise memory status to the different subsets evaluated. However, as previously demonstrated (31), at the baseline, the Mtb-specific CD45RA- CD27+ CD4 T cells were more represented in the TBI individuals, whereas the active-TB patients had a higher proportion of Mtb-specific CD45RA- CD27- CD4 T cells compared to TBI subjects. These findings reflect the loss of CD27 during active-TB disease, already documented in several studies (38–41, 57). Interestingly, after therapy completion, the active-TB patients had a phenotype more similar to TBI groups, with an increased proportion of the CD45RA- CD27+ subset and a contraction of the CD45RA- CD27- CD4 T cells. These data suggest that the high Mtb load in active-TB patients induces the differentiation of Mtb-specific CD45RA- CD27- CD4 T cells, whereas the low Mtb load of TBI individuals favours the CD45RA- CD27+ subset. The phenotype comparison among groups at each time point confirmed previous study on CD27 expression in patients with different TB status (31, 38, 40). Indeed, at the baseline, the TBI subjects had a higher proportion of Mtb-specific CD45RA- CD27+ CD4 T cells compared to active-TB and the active-TB a higher proportion of Mtb-specific CD45RA- CD27- CD4 T cells compared to TBI subjects. These data reflected the modulation of CD27 according to the Mtb bacterial load (39, 41). Interestingly, the TBI-IMID patients showed a phenotype profile similar to TBI subjects, suggesting that the type of IMID and the concomitant IMID therapy did not affect the activation status of Mtb-specific CD4 T cells. After TB therapy completion, the differences among Mtb-specific CD45RA- CD27+ CD4 T cells and CD45RA- CD27- CD4 T cells were less evident, suggesting that TB therapy, decreasing the Mtb load, led to an increased CD27 expression. Moreover, lately, recent and remote TBI have been shown to have a similar phenotype according to the expression of CD45RA CD27 CCR7 markers (29). Therefore, the phenotype of TBI-IMID individuals was not even due to their remote Mtb exposure. Larger studies are needed to better understand the modulation of the phenotype in these IMID patients. Considering that the IMID therapies were mostly based on the modulation of the immune system, indirectly we could suppose that the type of IMID therapy did not affect the immune response. Stratifying for the presence or not of biologic drugs, we did not find any significant differences among TBI-IMID before and after therapy completion. Although the sample size did not permit a deeper analysis, in support of these findings, we have previously demonstrated that neither the number of lymphocytes nor the type of IMID therapy influenced the IFN-γ response to QFT-Plus in TBI-IMID patients (28). Due to the adult age of the IMID manifestations, the TBI-IMID were older compared to TBI subjects. As lymphocyte counts decline with age (58) and potentially contribute to the immune impairment, we evaluated the lymphocyte counts in this study. No significant differences were found nor comparing all the three groups at each time points, neither comparing the two time points within each group. An exception was found considering those with active-TB in which a restore of the lymphocyte counts was observed after therapy completion (59). Moreover, the similar cytokine profile and phenotype of TBI subjects and TBI-IMID patients seem to support the presence of a comparable immune response to Mtb antigens. Therefore, as the immunity status at the different time points was comparable, the data reported could be considered reliable. Although these data are preliminary, we highlighted differences between the CD4 T-cell cytokine response over time of TBI-IMID compared to TBI and active-TB. Surprisingly, the monofunctional IFN-γ+ IL-2- TNF-α- CD4 T cells characterized the TBI and active-TB after therapy completion, whereas the TBI-IMID patients maintain a cytokine profile similar to the baseline. It is not possible to state if TB therapy induced a protective cytokine profile in TBI-IMID; however, these patients have been followed for 6 years and none of them developed until now active-TB disease. Since the phenotype studied based on CD45RA and CD27 did not allow to define a particular profile over time, we may need to better characterize the response using also other activation markers such as HLA-DR (29, 60). Limitations of this longitudinally study are the relatively low number of patients enrolled, the variety of the IMID considered, and the different regimens of IMID therapy. However, since only few studies are available on Mtb immune response in this fragile population of TBI subjects, we retain this is a good controlled study including two types of control populations (TBI and active-TB). More importantly, besides the reported caveats, we answered to opened important questions on Mtb-specific response in this particular understudied category of fragile TBI subjects at high risk to progress to active-TB disease. In conclusions, we evaluated over time the modulation of Mtb-specific immune response in patients at different stages of TB: a low-replicating Mtb status in TBI, a low-replicating Mtb status in TBI-IMID patients with high risk to develop the active-TB disease, and a high-replicating Mtb status in active-TB patients. The TB therapy did not modify the CD4 T-cell cytokine profile of TBI-IMID patients but determined a contraction of the triple functional CD4 T cells of the TBI subjects and active-TB patients. The CD45RA- CD27+ T cells stood out as a main subset of the Mtb-specific response in all groups of patients. Before the TB-preventive therapy, the TBI subjects had higher proportion of Mtb-specific CD45RA-CD27+CD4+ T cells and the active-TB higher proportion of Mtb-specific CD45RA-CD27-CD4+ T cells compared to other groups. The TBI-IMID patients showed a phenotype similar to TBI, suggesting that the type of IMID and the IMID therapy did not affect the activation status of Mtb-specific CD4 T cells. Future studies on a larger and better-stratified TBI-IMID population will help to understand the change of the Mtb-specific immune response over time and to identify possible immune biomarkers of Mtb-containment or active replication.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: The data sets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available in our institutional repository after request at rawdata.inmi.it.

Ethics Statement

The study involving human participants were approved by the Ethical Committee of “L. Spallanzani” National Institute of Infectious Diseases (INMI)-IRCCS, approval number 72/2015. The study was performed following the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

EP performed the experiments, analyzed and interpreted data, and wrote the manuscript. LP analyzed and interpreted data and revised the manuscript. TC performed the experiments. CF analyzed and interpreted data and revised the manuscript. GC enrolled patients and collected clinical data. AN performed the statistical analysis and interpreted data. VV processed blood samples. UM enrolled patients and revised the manuscript. ML, GG, NC, and FC revised the manuscript and participated in the interpretation of data. FP enrolled patients and revised the manuscript. DG designed and wrote the study, coordinated and supervised the project, contributed to the interpretation of the results, and revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study was funded by GR-2018-12367178 and Ricerca Corrente by Line four, all funded by Italian Ministry of Health.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
  58 in total

1.  Optimization and Interpretation of Serial QuantiFERON Testing to Measure Acquisition of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection.

Authors:  Elisa Nemes; Virginie Rozot; Hennie Geldenhuys; Nicole Bilek; Simbarashe Mabwe; Deborah Abrahams; Lebohang Makhethe; Mzwandile Erasmus; Alana Keyser; Asma Toefy; Yolundi Cloete; Frances Ratangee; Thomas Blauenfeldt; Morten Ruhwald; Gerhard Walzl; Bronwyn Smith; Andre G Loxton; Willem A Hanekom; Jason R Andrews; Maria D Lempicki; Ruth Ellis; Ann M Ginsberg; Mark Hatherill; Thomas J Scriba
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Analytical evaluation of QuantiFERON- Plus and QuantiFERON- Gold In-tube assays in subjects with or without tuberculosis.

Authors:  E Petruccioli; V Vanini; T Chiacchio; G Cuzzi; D M Cirillo; F Palmieri; G Ippolito; D Goletti
Journal:  Tuberculosis (Edinb)       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.131

3.  Use of several immunological markers to model the probability of active tuberculosis.

Authors:  Elisa Petruccioli; Assunta Navarra; Linda Petrone; Valentina Vanini; Gilda Cuzzi; Gina Gualano; Fabrizio Palmieri; Enrico Girardi; Delia Goletti
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 2.803

4.  HLA-E-restricted CD8+ T Lymphocytes Efficiently Control Mycobacterium tuberculosis and HIV-1 Coinfection.

Authors:  Marco Pio La Manna; Valentina Orlando; Teresa Prezzemolo; Paola Di Carlo; Antonio Cascio; Giovanni Delogu; Guido Poli; Lucy C Sullivan; Andrew G Brooks; Francesco Dieli; Nadia Caccamo
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 6.914

5.  Assessment of the novel T-cell activation marker-tuberculosis assay for diagnosis of active tuberculosis in children: a prospective proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Damien Portevin; Felicien Moukambi; Petra Clowes; Asli Bauer; Mkunde Chachage; Nyanda E Ntinginya; Elirehema Mfinanga; Khadija Said; Frederick Haraka; Andrea Rachow; Elmar Saathoff; Maximilian Mpina; Levan Jugheli; Fred Lwilla; Ben J Marais; Michael Hoelscher; Claudia Daubenberger; Klaus Reither; Christof Geldmacher
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2014-08-31       Impact factor: 25.071

Review 6.  Update on tuberculosis biomarkers: From correlates of risk, to correlates of active disease and of cure from disease.

Authors:  Delia Goletti; Meng-Rui Lee; Jann-Yuan Wang; Nicholas Walter; Tom H M Ottenhoff
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2018-02-18       Impact factor: 6.424

7.  Impact of antiretroviral and tuberculosis therapies on CD4+ and CD8+ HIV/M. tuberculosis-specific T-cell in co-infected subjects.

Authors:  Teresa Chiacchio; Elisa Petruccioli; Valentina Vanini; Gilda Cuzzi; Marco Pio La Manna; Valentina Orlando; Carmela Pinnetti; Alessandro Sampaolesi; Andrea Antinori; Nadia Caccamo; Delia Goletti
Journal:  Immunol Lett       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 3.685

8.  First characterization of the CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses to QuantiFERON-TB Plus.

Authors:  Elisa Petruccioli; Teresa Chiacchio; Ilaria Pepponi; Valentina Vanini; Rocco Urso; Gilda Cuzzi; Lucia Barcellini; Daniela Maria Cirillo; Fabrizio Palmieri; Giuseppe Ippolito; Delia Goletti
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 6.072

9.  Human CD8 T lymphocytes recognize Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens presented by HLA-E during active tuberculosis and express type 2 cytokines.

Authors:  Nadia Caccamo; Gabriella Pietra; Lucy C Sullivan; Andrew G Brooks; Teresa Prezzemolo; Marco P La Manna; Diana Di Liberto; Simone A Joosten; Krista E van Meijgaarden; Paola Di Carlo; Lucina Titone; Lorenzo Moretta; Maria C Mingari; Tom H M Ottenhoff; Francesco Dieli
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 6.688

10.  Revisiting the timetable of tuberculosis.

Authors:  Marcel A Behr; Paul H Edelstein; Lalita Ramakrishnan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-08-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.