| Literature DB >> 34436274 |
Ilekuttige Priyan Shanura Fernando1, Soo-Jin Heo2, Mawalle Kankanamge Hasitha Madhawa Dias3, Dissanayaka Mudiyanselage Dinesh Madusanka3, Eui-Jeong Han3, Min-Ju Kim3, Kalu Kapuge Asanka Sanjeewa4, Kyounghoon Lee5,6, Ginnae Ahn1,3.
Abstract
Ultraviolet (UV) B exposure is a prominent cause of skin aging and a contemporary subject of interest. The effects are progressing through the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that alter cell signaling pathways related to inflammatory responses. The present study evaluates the protective effects of (7aR)-6-hydroxy-4,4,7a-trimethyl-6,7-dihydro-5H-1-benzofuran-2-one (HTT) isolated from the edible brown algae Sargassum horneri against UVB protective effects in human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs). HTT treatment dose-dependently suppressed intracellular ROS generation in HDFs with an IC50 of 62.43 ± 3.22 µM. HTT abated UVB-induced mitochondrial hyperpolarization and apoptotic body formation. Furthermore, UVB-induced activation of key nuclear factor (NF)-κB and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling proteins were suppressed in HTT treated cells while downregulating pro-inflammatory cytokines (interleukin-1β, 6, 8, 33 and tumor necrosis factor-α). Moreover, HTT treatment downregulated matrix metalloproteinase1, 2, 3, 8, 9 and 13 that was further confirmed by the inhibition of collagenase and elastase activity. The evidence implies that HTT delivers protective effects against premature skin aging caused by UVB exposure via suppressing inflammatory responses and degradation of extracellular matrix (ECM) components. Extensive research in this regard will raise perspectives for using HTT as an ingredient in UV protective ointments.Entities:
Keywords: (−)-loliolide; Sargassum horneri; dermal fibroblasts; matrix metalloproteinase; ultraviolet B
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34436274 PMCID: PMC8399698 DOI: 10.3390/md19080435
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Optimization of UVB exposure, dose-response cytotoxicity, and UVB protective responses of HTT on HDFs. Evaluation of (A) intracellular ROS level and cell viability upon exposure of HDFs to different UVB doses. (B) Dose-response cytotoxicity of HTT on HDFs after a 24 h incubation period. (C) Protective effects of non-cytotoxic HTT doses on intracellular ROS level and HDF viability. Intracellular ROS level was measured 2 h after the stimulation or treatment whereas cell viability was measured after 24 h. Results represent the mean ± SD (error bars) of three independent experimental trials (n = 3). p-values less than 0.05 “*” and 0.001 “**” were considered as significant compared to the control group “#”.
Figure 2Effects of HTT in reducing UVB-induced mitochondrial damage and apoptosis in HDFs. Evaluation of (A) mitochondrial membrane hyperpolarization upon exposure to UVB. Evaluating apoptosis via (B) apoptotic body formation and (C) population of sub-G1 hypodiploid cells per cell cycle analysis. (D) Role of HTT in regulating mitochondria-mediated apoptotic proteins in UVB-induced keratinocytes. JC-1 assay was carried out 4 h after the UVB exposure while Hoechst 33342 nuclear staining, cell-cycle analysis, and western blotting were performed 24 h after the stimulation. Results represent the mean ± SD (error bars) of three independent experimental trials (n = 3). p-values less than 0.05 “*” and 0.001 “**” were considered as significant compared to the control group “#”.
Figure 3HTT reduces the phosphorylation of key NF-κB mediators and nuclear translocation of transcription factor NF-κB p65 in UVB-induced HDFs. (A) Suppressive effects of HTT towards UVB-induced phosphorylation of MAPK mediators. Evaluating the potential of HTT towards the suppression of UVB-induced (B) phosphorylation of key NF-κB mediators and (C) nuclear translocation of transcription factor NF-κB p65. (D) Immunofluorescence analysis of NF-κB p65 nuclear translocation. HDFs were either harvested or fixed 30 min after the UVB stimulation respectively for western blot and immunofluorescence analysis. Results represent the mean ± SD (error bars) of three independent experimental trials (n = 3). p-values less than 0.05 “*” and 0.001 “**” were considered as significant compared to the control group “#”.
Figure 4Effects of HTT towards the downregulation of inflammatory cytokine transcription in UVB-induced HDFs. Cells were harvested 18h after the UVB exposure and used for the analysis. Results represent the mean ± SD (error bars) of three independent experimental trials (n = 3). p-values less than 0.05 “*” and 0.001 “**” were considered as significant compared to the control group “#”.
Figure 5Effects of HTT towards the downregulation of Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in UVB-induced HDFs. Cells were harvested 24 h after the UVB exposure and used for the RT-PCR analysis. Results represent the mean ± SD (error bars) of three independent experimental trials (n = 3). p-values less than 0.05 “*” were considered as significant compared to the control group “#”.
Figure 6Effects of HTT towards the inhibition of collagenase and elastase activity in UVB-induced HDFs. Effects of HTT on (A) collagenase and (B) elastase activity in UVB exposed cells. Cells were harvested 24h after the UVB exposure and cell lysates were used for the analysis of collagenase and elastase activity. Results represent the mean ± SD (error bars) of three independent experimental trials (n = 3). p-values less than 0.001 “**” were considered as significant compared to the control group “#”.
Forward and reverse primer sequences for PCR analysis.
| Target Gene | Primer Sequence (5′ to 3′ Direction) | |
|---|---|---|
|
| Forward | TGT CCT GCG TGT TGA AAG ATG A |
| Reverse | CAG GCA GTT GGG CAT TGG TG | |
|
| Forward | GAT GGC TGA AAA AGA TGG ATG C |
| Reverse | TGG TTG GGT CAG GGG TGG TT | |
|
| Forward | ACA CTG CGC CAA CAC AGA AAT TA |
| Reverse | CAG GCA GTT GGG CAT TGG TG | |
|
| Forward | GAT GAG ATG TCT CGG CTG CTT G |
| Reverse | AGC CGT TAC GGA TAT GGT GGT C | |
|
| Forward | GGC AGT CAG ATC ATC TTC TCG AA |
| Reverse | GAA GGC CTA AGG TCC ACT TGT GT | |
|
| Forward | CTGAAGGTGATGAAGCAGCC |
| Reverse | AGTCCAAGAGAATGGCCGAG | |
|
| Forward | GCGACAAGAAGTATGGCTTC |
| Reverse | TGCCAAGGTCAATGTCAGGA | |
|
| Forward | CTCACAGACCTGACTCGGTT |
| Reverse | CACGCCTGAAGGAAGAGATG | |
|
| Forward | ATGGACCAACACCTCCGCAA |
| Reverse | GTCAATTGCTTGGACGCTGC | |
|
| Forward | CGCAGACATCGTCATCCAGT |
| Reverse | GGATTGGCCTTGGAAGATGA | |
|
| Forward | CTATGGTCCAGGAGATGAAG |
| Reverse | AGAGTCTTGCCTGTATCCTC | |
|
| Forward | CGT CTA GAA AAA CCT GCC AA |
| Reverse | TGA AGT CAA AGG AGA CCA CC- |