Literature DB >> 34435036

Health-related quality of life and disease progression in pulmonary arterial hypertension patients: a 3-year study.

Laurence Halimi1, Carey M Suehs1,2, Gregory Marin2, Clement Boissin1, Anne-Sophie Gamez1, Isabelle Vachier1, Nicolas Molinari2,3, Arnaud Bourdin1,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The role of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and psychological variables in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) progression remains poorly quantified. We aimed to investigate the relationship between disease progression in PAH patients and HRQoL and psychological characteristics.
METHODS: A 3-year longitudinal cohort was initiated. Patients with stable PAH (groups I-IV ineligible for angioplasty/endarterectomy) were included (n=55). Standard clinical variables, including invasive haemodynamic parameters, were prospectively recorded. A battery of questionnaires was used to characterise the psychological status of patients upon study initiation, and HRQoL was quantified using the SF-36 Questionnaire every 3 months for 24 months, and then again at 36 months. Guideline-defined disease progression and progression-free survival were recorded for 36 months.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Psychological distress was highly prevalent at baseline. The Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the HRQoL were poor (PCS=37.13±8.18; MCS=42.42±10.88) but stable over 3 years of follow-up. Among PCS subscales, Physical Functioning (PF) (p=0.012) was identified as being independently associated with disease progression (Cox survival model), along with mean pulmonary arterial pressure (p=0.003) and cardiac output (p=0.005). Depression was the unique independent psychological characteristic associated with PF (p=0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: PAH patients have poor HRQoL. In addition to already known criteria related to disease severity, the HRQoL PF subscale is independently associated with disease progression in PAH. This may be explained by depression.
Copyright ©The authors 2021.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34435036      PMCID: PMC8381263          DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00617-2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ERJ Open Res        ISSN: 2312-0541


Introduction

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare and progressive disease caused by persistent elevation of pulmonary arterial pressure leading to right-side heart failure [1]. At onset of PAH, symptoms remain nonspecific (fatigue, shortness of breath on exertion and exercise limitations) and a delay in diagnosis is frequent, draining patients of their psychological resources. According to the national data registry, there were approximately 1700 PAH patients in France in 2006, and between 15 and 50 cases per million individuals worldwide [2]. Over the past three decades, medical treatments have been developed and overall prognosis has improved [3] but mortality remains high and increasing survival remains a research priority. Improving health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has also become an essential objective supported by patients [4, 5]. Most clinical assessments during follow-up are integrated within a prognostic evaluation system based on right atrial pressure, cardiac output, 6-min walking distance (6MWD), pericardial effusion and right atrial surface, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, maximal oxygen uptake, symptoms (New York Heart Association (NYHA), syncope) and their progression. Although poor HRQoL is reported in this disabling disease, whether or not HRQoL should be considered as a prognostic criterion has not been addressed. In incident patients, HRQoL is a prognostic marker [5] that can change with time, together with the health context [6]. However, systematic longitudinal evaluation by clinicians is not practised [7] and even in research situations, repeated evaluations remain rare. To our knowledge, no PAH study has regularly monitored HRQoL over a relatively long timespan. The most common generic HRQoL evaluation is the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Questionnaire [8], for which minimally important differences have been determined in PAH [9]. Several studies have found improved or unchanged SF-36 scores following various treatment trials in PAH [5, 10]. A systematic review underlined the heterogeneity of results, as well as the limited availability of data concerning their prognostic significance [11]. It is therefore still unclear whether poor HRQoL in PAH should be seen as a cofactor and eventually as an expected consequence of the disease or if it should be seen as a prognostic criterion. The self-assessment of HRQoL is a cognitive process, and therefore open to the influence of psychological factors [12]. PAH impacts involving anxiety and depression have been repeatedly demonstrated [13, 14]. Current guidelines therefore stress the association between anxiety and depression and poor HRQoL [4]. Other psychological factors have the potential to expand our understanding of HRQoL [15]. Within this context, we initiated a 3-year study to evaluate HRQoL in PAH patients with stable disease versus those who had acute disease aggravation. Associations with baseline clinical and psychological characteristics were also tested.

Methods

Study population

The HyPsy protocol (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01380054; https://osf.io/8qduc/) included 55 PAH patients from May 2011 to November 2012 at the Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital (Montpellier University Hospitals, France). The study was approved by an independent ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes – SudMéditerranée III; reference number: 2011.04.01) and all patients gave their informed consent to enter the study in accordance with French law. Briefly, this 3-year longitudinal study included patients aged 18 to 80 years who had stable PAH for at least 3 months and no prior psychological care/support.

Patient monitoring for 3 years

Relevant right heart catheterisation variables were measured at baseline. Data concerning the baseline 6-min walk test (6MWT) were also recorded: distance walked (in metres and classified as above or below a 400 m threshold), the associated Borg scale (score from 0 to 10); heart rate at the beginning and end of the test (HRstart and HRstop; beats per minute (bpm)), peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO) at the beginning and end of the test (SpO and SpO; %), and whether or not the latter two measures differed by at least 4%, indicating a clinically significant change in SpO during the 6MWT (ΔSpO; yes/no). Baseline psychological assessments included questionnaires describing anxiety and depression, coping mechanisms, perceived social support and beliefs concerning perceived control (table 1). HRQoL was also measured every 3 months for 24 months and then again at 36 months using the SF-36 Questionnaire [8]. Disease progression (defined as aggravation requiring a change in treatment or death) versus disease stability was also monitored for 36 months, and triggered an additional HRQoL evaluation.
TABLE 1

Presentation of psychological evaluation tools used

Questionnaire, purpose and item example Likert scale used Subscales/dimensions Interpretation rules (if any)
HADS:Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale [30, 31]The HADS detects anxiety and/or depression, evaluates their severity and avoids confusion with somatic illnesses.I have lost interest in my appearance.4 levels0 to 3Depression (14 items)Anxiety (14 items)Non-cases: 0–7Possible cases: 8–10Probable cases: 11–21Global score:No anxio-depressive disorders: 0–14Anxio-depressive disorders: 15–42
STAI-Y:State-Trait Anxiety Inventory form Y [32, 33]The STAI-Y evaluates anxiety and differentiates the anxiety-trait (AT) from anxiety-state (AS)I feel satisfied with myself. I have disturbing thoughts.4 levels“No” to “Yes”“Almost never” to “Almost always”(0 to 3)State anxiety (20 items)Trait anxiety (20 items)Very high anxiety: >65High anxiety: 56–65Average anxiety: 46–55Low anxiety: 36–45Very low anxiety: ≤35
CHIP:Coping with Health Injuries and Problems [34, 35]The CHIP, specific to health-related problems, refers to the thoughts and actions we use to deal, in order to master, minimise or tolerate stress and threatening situations.I wonder why it happened to me5 levels“Not at all” to “Very much”(1 to 5)Distraction coping (D; 8 items)Instrumental coping (I; 8 items)Emotional preoccupation (E; 8 items)Palliative coping (P; 8 items)Likert scores are summed per subscale. Subscale sums are then transformed according to age and sex. The latter (T-scores) have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.
WCC:Ways of Coping Checklist [36, 37]The WCC identifies, from a stressful situation not linked to the disease (divorce, moving, conflict, etc.), strategies which have been used to confront the situation.I accepted sympathy and understanding from someone4 levels“No” to “Yes”(0 to 3)Problem-focused (9 items)Emotion-focused (9 items)Search for social support (9 items)Possible scores range from 0 to 27 for each subscale
SSQ6:Short Form of the Social Support Questionnaire [38, 39]The SSQ intends to quantify the dimensions of perceived availability of and satisfaction with social supportWhom can you really count on to help you feel more relaxed when you are under pressure or tense?(For each item, there is a two-part answer: Part 1: list all the people that fit the description of the question. Part 2: use the Likert scale to indicate satisfaction)6 levels“Very satisfied” to “Very dissatisfied”(1 to 6)Number of available people (N; 6 items with up to nine people in each item)Satisfaction (S; 6 items)SSQ Number score (N): the total score ranges between 0 and 54SSQ Satisfaction score (S): the total score ranges between 6 and 36
MHLC-C:Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Form C [39, 40]This scale measures health-specific locus of control along four dimensions. The extent to which individuals believe that: 1) health is a consequence of their own actions, 2) under the influence of doctors, 3) under the influence of powerful others, 4) due to chance.Form C is designed to be “condition-specific”, i.e. used when studying people with an existing health condition.Other people play a big role in whether my condition improves, stays the same or gets worse6 levels“Strongly disagree” to “Strongly agree”(1 to 6)Internal (I; 6 items)External: Chance (C; 3 items)External: Doctors (D; 3 items)External: Powerful others (O; 6 items)Possible range:Internal and Chance: 6–36Doctors and Other powerful people: 3–18
Presentation of psychological evaluation tools used

Statistics

Quantitative variable distributions were evaluated using the Shapiro–Wilk test, and normal variables summarised via their means and standard deviations. Other quantitative variables were presented as medians accompanied by their interquartile ranges and qualitative variables as numbers and percentages. Baseline characteristics were compared between stable and disease-progression patients with t-tests or Mann–Whitney U-tests, as appropriate. Cox models were used to analyse the relationships between baseline clinical and HRQoL variables and progression-free survival (delay to disease progression or death). Univariate models were first carried out, and variables with p-values <0.15 were entered into a multivariable Cox model with forward selection. The coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (CI) are provided for the final model including only those variables independently and significantly associated with progression-free survival. A bootstrapping of the Cox model was carried out, via case resampling with replacement. 1000 bootstrapped samples were calculated, and the Cox models were executed in each sample. Mixed models were used to study the impact of time, disease stability and potential time × disease stability interactions on subscales (Physical Functioning (PF), Physical Component Summary (PCS), Mental Component Summary (MCS)) of the SF-36 HRQoL Questionnaire. In order to better understand the psychological characteristics potentially associated with HRQoL, linear regression models were performed with PF as the dependent variable and baseline psychological variables as independent variables. As with Cox models, variables with a univariate result of p<0.15 were retained for analysis at the multivariable level using a forward stepwise method. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.1 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and R v.3.1.1 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing), and the statistical bilateral significance threshold was set at 5%.

Results

Baseline description of the population and initial results

Demographic characteristics, anxiety and depression Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS), State and Trait anxiety (STAI-Y), coping (CHIP and WCC) and HRQoL (SF-36) baseline values for the total population have been previously reported in detail [16]. Briefly, the population had a mean age of 57.8±15.3 years, and was 64% women. A slight majority (51%) of patients suffered from anxiety and depression (HADS anxiety and depression scores: 8.7±4.7 and 6.16±3.9, respectively). Patients had moderate to very high state (60%; STAI-Y state anxiety: 48.2±7.5) and trait (64%; STAI-Y trait anxiety: 50.5±14.0) anxiety, especially for men. Stressful-life-event-coping (WCC) and disease-coping (CHIP) strategies focused on problem coping strategies. HRQoL was poor and the mean values for the PCS (37.1±8.03) and the MCS (42.4±10.9) were particularly low. Regarding medical parameters, the patients included were fairly representative of the population usually described for PAH [4]. More than 50% were in functional classes I–II and the mean 6MWD±sd was 382±33 m. The haemodynamic parameters for those patients who were already being treated (58% receiving bi- or tri-therapy) corresponded to severe PAH (pulmonary vascular resistance of 10.0±6.6 Wood's units) but with conserved cardiac output. Multivariate analysis showed a significant positive relationship between 6MWD and PCS and a significant negative relationship between delta SpO≥4% and MCS. Depression and Trait-Anxiety were associated with a lower physical (p=0.001) and mental (p<0.001) HRQoL, respectively [16].

Differences between progression-free and disease-progression groups

Baseline values for stable and unstable (i.e. patients with no observed disease progression during the 3 years of follow-up versus those who were observed to decline) patient groups are presented in tables 2 and 3. Certain clinical variables significantly differed between the two groups, including mean pulmonary arterial pressure, PAH treatments, NYHA class and 6MWT results (distance and oxygen saturation at the beginning and end of the test). Both the PCS and MCS were higher (p=0.06; p=0.04) in the stable group. All anxiety-related scores (STAI-Y state and trait anxiety scores, the HAD anxiety, depression and total scores) were significantly worse (p=0.03; p=0.01; p=0.05; p=0.01, p=0.01, respectively) in the unstable group. The WCC emotion score was significantly higher (p=0.03) in the unstable group, which indicates that the coping strategies used to manage stressful life events are more focused on emotional responses (table 3).
TABLE 2

Demographic and clinical characteristics for stable (no observed disease progression over the 3 years of follow-up) and disease-progression patient groups as guideline-defined

Characteristics All PAH patients Disease progression Stable p-value
n Centrality n Centrality n Centrality
Age (years) 5557.8±15.32558.1±16.53057.6±14.70.915
Female, n (%) 5535 (64)2514 (56)3021 (70)0.282
Incident/prevalent, n (%) 5512 (22)/43 (78)256 (24)/19 (76)306 (20)/24 (80)0.720
Aetiology, n (%) 552530 0.038
 Congenital1 (1.8)0 (0)1 (3.3)
 Histiocytosis2 (3.6)1 (4)1 (3.3)
 Idiopathic40 (72.7)22 (88)18 (60)
 CTEPH12 (21.8)2 (8)10 (33.3)
PAH treatments, n (%) 552530 0.003
 No treatment1 (2)0 (0)1 (3.3)
 Monotherapy20 (36)4 (16)16 (53.3)
 Bi-therapy26 (47)18 (72)8 (26.7)
 Tri-therapy#8 (15)3 (12)5 (16.7)
Oxygen, n (%) 5524 (44)2513 (52)3011 (36.67)0.253
Comorbidities, n (%) 5538 (69)2517 (68)3021 (70)
NYHA I/II/III/IV, n (%) 558 (15)/25 (45)/19 (35)/3 (5)250 (0)/12 (48)/11 (44)/2 (8)308 (26.7)/13 (43.3)/8 (26.7)/1 (3.3) 0.018
Right heart catheterisation
 Cardiac output (L·min−1)515.3±1.9245.8±2.0274.9±1.70.114
mPAP (mmHg) 5244.5 (38.5–51)2548 (40–64)2743 (29–48) 0.012
PCWP (mmHg) 449.3±3.62110.1±3.4238.7±3.80.221
 RAP (mmHg)348 (5–10)1510 (7–12)198 (3–9)0.058
 PVR (Wood's units)508.6 (6.2–11.1)248.7 (7.0–12.3)268.4 (6.1–9.7)0.472
6-min walk test
 Distance (6MWD)52386±13123336±11629425±131 0.013
 6MWD <160 m, n (%)3 (5.8)2 (8.7)1 (3.5) 0.081
 160 m≤6MWD≤400 m, n (%)29 (55.8)16 (69.6)13 (44.8)
 6MWD >400 m, n (%)20 (38.5)5 (21.7)15 (51.7)
 Max 6MWD Borg score524.8±2.7234.8±2.9294.8±2.50.984
Cardiac frequency (bpm)
 Baseline1777 (70–92)575 (69–92)1278 (62–109)0.966
 End16108.5 (96–123.5)6121.5 (97–133)10104 (95–115)0.209
Oxygen saturation (%)
 Baseline3895.5 (92–97)1492.5 (87–96)2496 (94–97.5) 0.039
 End4388 (78–92)1979 (73–88)2489 (87–95.5) 0.002
 Delta SpO2≥4%3325 (76)1211 (92)2114 (67)0.282

Data are presented as mean±sd or median (interquartile range), unless otherwise stated. PAH: pulmonary arterial hypertension; CTEPH: chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; NYHA: New York Heart Association; mPAP: mean pulmonary arterial pressure; PCWP: pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; RAP: right arterial pressure; PVR: pulmonary vascular resistance; 6MWD: 6-min walking distance; SpO: oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetery. #: ERA, IPDE-5, PGI2.

TABLE 3

Health-related quality of life and psychological baseline characteristics for stable (no observed disease progression over the 3 years of follow-up) and disease-progression patient groups

Characteristics Total population Disease progression Stable p-value
n Centrality n Centrality n Centrality
SF-36: Health-Related Quality of Life
 PCS5537.13±8.182534.81±7.283039.04±8.500.060
  Physical functioning5550.00 (25.0–65.0)2532.50 (15.0–62.5)3055.00 (40.0–75.0) 0.013
  Role-physical5525.00 (0.0–75.0)2512.50 (0.0–50.0)3050.00 (0.0–75.0) 0.039
  Bodily pain5552.00 (41.0–84.0)2541.00 (36.0–72.5)3052.00 (42.0–84.0)0.098
  General health5535.00 (30.0–47.0)2535.00 (23.5–45.0)3035.00 (30.0–50.0)0.219
 MCS5542.42±10.882538.98±11.773045.05±9.39 0.042
  Vitality5545.64±17.822541.60±18.133049.00±17.140.099
  Social functioning5562.50 (50.0–75.0)2562.50 (25.0–68.7)3062.50 (50.0–75.0) 0.043
  Role-emotional5533.33 (0.0–100.0)2516.67 (0.0–83.3)3066.67 (33.3–100.0) 0.047
  Mental health5556.00±18.602550.56±17.513060.53±18.55 0.016
HADS: Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale
 Anxiety559.0 (4.0–12.0)2510.0 (8.0–12.0)305.0 (4.0–11.0)0.054
 Depression556.0 (2.0–10.0)259.0 (5.0–11.0)304.0 (2.0–7.0) 0.010
 Total score5517.0 (8.0–22.0)2518.0 (13.0–23.0)309.5 (3.0–25.0) 0.015
STAI-Y: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form Y
 State anxiety5548.48±7.502550.52±7.543046.23±7.01 0.033
 Trait anxiety5550.55±14.522555.52±13.683046.40±14.10 0.018
CHIP: Coping with Health Injuries and Problems
 Distraction5527.35±6.572526.16±6.573028.33±6.510.298
 Palliative5526.11±4.762525.56±4.953026.57±4.640.737
 Instrumental5530.44±6.172529.96±6.193030.83±6.220.246
 Emotional preoccupation5525.13±7.482526.28±7.273024.17±7.630.206
WCC: Ways of Coping Checklist
 WCC problem5326.28±5.552426.29±5.152926.28±5.960.991
 WCC emotion5323.23±5.792425.04±5.822921.72±5.40 0.036
 WCC social support5320.45±5.462419.25±5.572921.45±5.250.146
SSQ: Social Support Questionnaire
 SSQ availability5313.0 (8.0–16.0)2414.0 (9.0–15.0)2913.0 (8.0–16.0)0.943
 SSQ satisfaction5330.0 (26.0–34.0)2429.5 (24.5–34.0)2930.0 (28.0–36.0)0.181
MHLC-C: Multidimensional Health Locus of Control
 Internal5519.33±6.212519.52±6.203019.17±6.310.835
 External: chance5520.65±6.482519.84±6.403021.33±6.580.400
 External: doctors5515.00 (12.0–17.0)2515.00 (12.0–17.0)3015.50 (12.0–17.0)0.820
 External: others5510.78±3.692511.48±3.863010.20±3.490.202

Data are presented as mean±sd or median (interquartile range), unless otherwise stated. PCS: Physical Composite Summary; MCS: Mental Composite Summary.

Demographic and clinical characteristics for stable (no observed disease progression over the 3 years of follow-up) and disease-progression patient groups as guideline-defined Data are presented as mean±sd or median (interquartile range), unless otherwise stated. PAH: pulmonary arterial hypertension; CTEPH: chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; NYHA: New York Heart Association; mPAP: mean pulmonary arterial pressure; PCWP: pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; RAP: right arterial pressure; PVR: pulmonary vascular resistance; 6MWD: 6-min walking distance; SpO: oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetery. #: ERA, IPDE-5, PGI2. Health-related quality of life and psychological baseline characteristics for stable (no observed disease progression over the 3 years of follow-up) and disease-progression patient groups Data are presented as mean±sd or median (interquartile range), unless otherwise stated. PCS: Physical Composite Summary; MCS: Mental Composite Summary.

Explaining progression-free survival

The progression-free survival curve is presented in figure 1; 54% of the study population (which included 0% lost to follow-up) was progression-free at the end of 3 years of follow-up. According to the survival curve, aggravation occurred linearly. At the univariate level, several clinical variables were found to be associated with progression-free survival: NYHA class, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, cardiac output, right atrium pressure and 6MWT results (distance, the 400 m threshold and oxygen saturation at the beginning and end of the test). Regarding HRQoL variables, all the SF-36 Questionnaire subscales, except Bodily Pain and General Health, were associated with progression-free survival.
FIGURE 1

Progression-free survival. Aggravation occurred linearly.

Progression-free survival. Aggravation occurred linearly. At the multivariable level, mean pulmonary arterial pressure (hazard ratio (HR) 1.053; 95% CI 1.023–1.084; p=0.0153), cardiac output (HR 1.559; 95% CI 1.189–2.045; p=0.0013) and the PF subscale (HR 0.978; 95% CI 0.962–0.995; p=0.0106) were significantly associated with progression-free survival (table 4). The bootstrapping approach confirms these results.
TABLE 4

Univariate and multivariable Cox model results describing associations between baseline clinical variables and progression-free survival

Hazard ratio 95% CI p-value
Univariate analysis
 New York Heart Association stage2.0831.250–3.470 0.0048#
 Mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mmHg)1.0391.013–1.065 0.0028#
 Pulmonary capillary pressure (mmHg)1.0430.923–1.1800.4969
 Cardiac output (L·min−1)1.2670.996–1.6120.0535#
 Pulmonary vascular resistance (Wood's units)1.0080.952–1.0670.7796
 Right atrium pressure (mmHg)1.1941.048–1.359 0.0075#
 6-min walk test
  Distance (m)0.9960.993–0.999 0.0080#
  Distance (m) >440 m versus ≤440 m0.3980.166–0.9540.0389#
  Borg test1.0060.858–1.1790.9421
 Cardiac frequency (bpm)
  Baseline1.0040.947–1.0640.9011
  End1.0180.985–1.0530.2852
 Oxygen saturation (%)
  Baseline0.8960.821–0.977 0.0132#
  End0.9370.902–0.974 0.0010#
  Δ≥4%4.1440.534–32.160.1739
 SF-36 Questionnaire
  Physical functioning0.9810.966–0.996 0.0142#
  Role-physical0.9860.975–0.998 0.0212#
  Bodily pain0.9910.975–1.0080.3053
  General health0.9870.965–1.0090.2436
  Vitality0.9770.953–1.0020.0705#
  Social functioning0.9830.968–0.998 0.0304#
  Role-emotional0.9880.978–0.998 0.0199#
  Mental health0.9760.955–0.997 0.0267#
Multivariate analysis
 SF-36 Questionnaire: physical functioning0.9780.962–0.995 0.0106
 Mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mmHg)1.0531.023–1.084 0.0153
 Cardiac output (L·min−1)1.5591.189–2.045 0.0013

Δ≥4%: change in oxygen saturation over 4%; SF-36: 36-item Short-Form Health Survey. #: variables with a univariate p<0.15 were retained for multivariable analysis.

Univariate and multivariable Cox model results describing associations between baseline clinical variables and progression-free survival Δ≥4%: change in oxygen saturation over 4%; SF-36: 36-item Short-Form Health Survey. #: variables with a univariate p<0.15 were retained for multivariable analysis.

Stability of HRQoL over time

When examining the PF subscale of the SF-36 Questionnaire as a function of time and disease stability via a mixed model, only disease stability versus instability was significantly associated with PF (coefficient=18.53; se=7.22; p=0.013). No association with time or the interaction term (stability × time) was found, indicating that the PF subscale was stable throughout the 3 years of complete follow-up (figure 2). PCS and MCS were also stable across time (figure 3). Given this stability, we further explored the contributions of psychological variables to PF scores at baseline.
FIGURE 2

Physical functioning (PF) subscale of 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) values over time. No association with time or the interaction term (stability × time) was found, indicating that the PF subscale was stable throughout the 3 years of complete follow-up.

FIGURE 3

Mental Component Summary (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) values over time. No association with time or the interaction term (stability × time) was found, indicating that PCS and MCS were stable throughout the 3 years of complete follow-up. SF-36: 36-item Short-Form Health Survey.

Physical functioning (PF) subscale of 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) values over time. No association with time or the interaction term (stability × time) was found, indicating that the PF subscale was stable throughout the 3 years of complete follow-up. Mental Component Summary (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) values over time. No association with time or the interaction term (stability × time) was found, indicating that PCS and MCS were stable throughout the 3 years of complete follow-up. SF-36: 36-item Short-Form Health Survey.

Association between PF subscale and baseline psychological variables

When examining the relationships between baseline psychological variables and the HRQoL PF subscale, several significant associations were demonstrated at the univariate level (table 5), including negative associations with anxiety and depression variables and the CHIP Emotion score. At the multivariable level, only the HADS Depression score (coefficient=–3.26; se=0.79; p=0.0001) was significantly negatively associated with the PF subscale.
TABLE 5

Univariate and multivariable linear regression results describing associations between baseline psychological variables and the physical functioning subscale from the SF-36 Health-related Quality of Life Questionnaire

Coefficient Standard error p-value
Univariate analysis
 HADS
  HADS total−1.810.41 <0.0001#
  HADS anxiety−2.080.71 0.0007#
  HADS depression−3.510.77 <0.0001#
 STAI-Y
  State anxiety−0.990.47 0.0393#
  Trait anxiety−0.800.22 0.0007#
 CHIP
  Distraction1.050.530.0558#
  Instrumental0.840.590.1539
  Emotional preoccupation−1.120.46 0.0187#
  Palliative0.200.770.7995
 WCC
  Problem-focused0.740.650.2580
  Emotion-focused−1.070.610.0859#
  Search for social support0.540.650.4160
 SSQ6
  Availability0.280.380.4692
  Satisfaction−0.120.520.8204
 MHLC-C
  Internal locus of control0.740.570.2005
  External locus of control
   Chance0.550.560.3293
   Doctors0.191.000.8467
   Powerful others−1.480.970.1342#
Multivariate analysis
 HADS depression−3.260.79 0.0001

HADS: Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale; STAI-Y: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form Y; CHIP: Coping with Health Injuries and Problems; WCC: Ways of coping Checklist; SSQ6: Social Support Questionnaire-6; MHLC-C: Multidimensional Health Locus of Control. Bold indicates significance. #: variables with a univariate p<0.15 were retained for multivariable analysis.

Univariate and multivariable linear regression results describing associations between baseline psychological variables and the physical functioning subscale from the SF-36 Health-related Quality of Life Questionnaire HADS: Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale; STAI-Y: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form Y; CHIP: Coping with Health Injuries and Problems; WCC: Ways of coping Checklist; SSQ6: Social Support Questionnaire-6; MHLC-C: Multidimensional Health Locus of Control. Bold indicates significance. #: variables with a univariate p<0.15 were retained for multivariable analysis.

Discussion

This study demonstrates a positive, independent association between progression-free survival and the SF-36 HRQoL PF subscale score in a 55-patient PAH cohort with no loss to follow-up over a 3-year period. Unexpectedly, PF and both the MCS and PCS scores were stable over the entire study period. Progression-free survival was associated with clinical findings comprising negative relationships with mean pulmonary arterial pressure and cardiac output. A battery of baseline psychological tests further demonstrated differences between the stable and disease-progression patient groups that complement differences in HRQoL. Specifically, depression was negatively associated with the PF subscale. Risk assessment in PAH currently relies on parameters from clinical, haemodynamic, echographic, cardiopulmonary exercise testing and specific biomarker assessments. HRQoL has never been previously assessed in this regard. Surprisingly, HRQoL did not statistically decline over time. However, baseline values were associated with disease progression. This reinforces the results of a retrospective study by McCabe et al. [17] suggesting that the predictive value of the CAMPHOR Questionnaire is also restricted to baseline values. These results suggest that HRQoL monitoring can provide additional useful and complementary information to the traditional PAH work-up, but does not need to be carried out at overly frequent intervals. In addition, several psychological variables differed between the progression-free and disease-progression groups at baseline, indicating that the latter individuals have stronger anxiety (trait and state anxiety) and depression and resort more often to emotional coping strategies to deal with daily stressors. However, at the multivariable level, the only psychological variable associated with HRQoL was depression. The reader should note that the study cohort included one-quarter incident patients, and these patterns may be specific to patients in the process of disease discovery. As specifically concerns coping with stressful life events (WCC) and with the disease (CHIP), baseline values for the total population highlighted strategies that were primarily problem-focused, indicating a tendency to want to control the situation [16]. However, in the disease-progression group, such coping strategies (WCC) were more focused on emotional responses. Additionally, when examining the relationships between baseline psychological variables and the HRQoL PF subscale, a significant negative association with the CHIP Emotion score was demonstrated. People living with PAH are particularly vulnerable when they are newly diagnosed or when they have to deal with the loss of a fellow patient or with a change in treatment. Emotion-focused coping may be the only realistic option when the source of stress is outside the person's control. Furthermore, emotion-focused coping is usually linked to poor HRQoL and associated with symptoms of depression and anxiety [18], as for our PAH disease-progression group. Previous studies have remarked upon the presence of (presumably) state anxiety, which can be observed to accumulate or peak during: 1) the waiting-for-a-diagnosis period [19], 2) the moment when a PAH diagnosis is announced, or just prior to 3) key progression-determining exams such as right heart catheterisation [20] or 6MWT (in our clinical experience). An additional key moment is the initiation of prostacyclin treatment as well demonstrated by Shafazand et al. [13], where state anxiety decreases during treatment. An amelioration of mood disorders following PAH diagnosis and treatment has been previously observed [21]. Our results place a new-found importance on trait anxiety, i.e. a nonmodifiable and functional personality trait. Patients with an anxious personality type are likely to have a poorer HRQoL, regardless of incident/prevalent status or therapy type (bi- or tri-therapies) [16]. This observation in PAH is important because in-depth work on their life story will be more beneficial than exposure to fears as in behavioural and cognitive therapies designed to help manage state anxiety. It is also quite interesting that depression was associated with the HRQoL PF score during multivariable analysis. The association of depression with decreased physical functioning has already been reported [22], and depression has been previously demonstrated as a predictor of reduced HRQoL [23]. Depression is common following the diagnosis of a serious illness. Depression disturbs thought and action and these problematic side-effects may interfere with a PAH patient's already compromised HRQoL. Associated directions of causality (Does physical degradation automatically lead to depression? Are non-depressed patients adapting better to PAH? Does depression lead to a more pessimistic self-assessment of HRQoL PF?) remain to be determined. The PF subscale is designed to examine a person's perceived limitation in performing any physical activity [8]. It reflects a wide range of physical disability, which can cause significant changes in family life, financial situations and social interactions. All such perceived physical limitations can cause depression or be accentuated thereby; for example, certain patients may give up walking exercises to avoid the anxiety they cause. Fatigue and lack of energy may therefore be due to PAH and/or depression. Depression, like PAH, is difficult to recognise and understand, and in depression as in PAH, the suffering is internal, with few visible external signs. Identifying and treating depression is therefore essential. The limitations of this study include its observational, single-centre nature and sample size, although the latter is actually quite large compared to most PAH studies and reflects the relative rarity of the disease. In addition, disease-specific quality of life tools, such as the CAMPHOR [24], have not been validated in French. As a result, and due to the lack of a minimally clinical important difference for the CAMPHOR [7] and a demonstrated lack of predictive value for repeated CAMPHOR measures [17], we chose a generic measure (the SF-36). The latter, although known to be highly correlated with the CAMPHOR [25], may not be as sensitive to changes in PAH populations [26]. In this case, the patterns in this paper can be considered as conservative in nature. Many authors in the domain have chosen the SF-36 over disease-specific tools even when the latter exist in their languages because it is better known, rapid, easy and reliable [5, 7]. Additionally, the SF-36 has been demonstrated as responsive to change in PAH drug trials [27]. It is also surprising to find that 6MWT distance >400 m was not retained at the multivariate level (table 4) as it has been demonstrated as quite predictive in previous studies [28]. However, this is probably due to the small sample sizes involved. Utmost care was also taken to convince patients to participate in follow-up activities, and our dataset reports no loss to follow-up, which is a great strength. A further strength is the power-supporting, repeated, 3-monthly measures of HRQoL, which, to our knowledge, have not been previously reported for PAH populations. Finally, the patients included in this cohort were treated for anxiety and depression, including in-house psychological support every 3 months if needed and at times of acute disease decline, in accordance with current recommendations [4]. Guidelines for the use of psychological tests stress that the administration of psychological assessments via telephone, via postal mail, in the presence of a doctor, or in the absence of a psychologist, without knowledge of the patient's psychological status on a given day, are all sources of bias that commonly appear in the literature [29] and that do not apply to the present study. How this might have affected our results in comparison with previous studies should be taken into account. In conclusion, the positive independent association between the HRQoL PF subscale and progression-free survival starts at baseline, indicating that HRQoL is important complementary information in the work-up of PAH patients. The frequency of psychological symptoms is relatively high, but only depression is independently associated with HRQoL. Lastly, it is interesting to note that HRQoL, which was stable over time in the present cohort, was associated with depression that is also known to be potentially chronic over time. Identifying and treating depression is a major issue in the management of PAH. The patient's point of view regarding his/her health status is essential in decision-making procedures, and future studies by our team will focus on the words patients use to describe their disease, moods, behaviours and HRQoL. Given its independent association with decline, HRQoL should be further studied to elucidate its prognostic potential.
  33 in total

1.  Pulmonary arterial hypertension in France: results from a national registry.

Authors:  Marc Humbert; Olivier Sitbon; Ari Chaouat; Michèle Bertocchi; Gilbert Habib; Virginie Gressin; Azzedine Yaici; Emmanuel Weitzenblum; Jean-François Cordier; François Chabot; Claire Dromer; Christophe Pison; Martine Reynaud-Gaubert; Alain Haloun; Marcel Laurent; Eric Hachulla; Gérald Simonneau
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  The Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR): a measure of health-related quality of life and quality of life for patients with pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  S P McKenna; N Doughty; D M Meads; L C Doward; J Pepke-Zaba
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization.

Authors: 
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  [Evaluation of anxiety and depression among patients hospitalized on an internal medicine service].

Authors:  J P Lépine; M Godchau; P Brun; T Lempérière
Journal:  Ann Med Psychol (Paris)       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 0.380

5.  Depressive symptoms in relation to physical functioning in pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  Karl J Looper; Andrena Pierre; David M Dunkley; John J Sigal; David Langleben
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 6.  Pulmonary arterial hypertension: pathogenesis and clinical management.

Authors:  Thenappan Thenappan; Mark L Ormiston; John J Ryan; Stephen L Archer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-03-14

7.  The hospital anxiety and depression scale.

Authors:  A S Zigmond; R P Snaith
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 6.392

8.  Sildenafil improves health-related quality of life in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Joanna Pepke-Zaba; Claire Gilbert; Lorraine Collings; Martin C J Brown
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Improving patient care in pulmonary arterial hypertension: addressing psychosocial issues.

Authors:  Iraklis Tsangaris
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Quality of life as a prognostic marker in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Caio J C S Fernandes; Barbara C S Martins; Carlos V P Jardim; Rozana M Ciconelli; Luciana K Morinaga; Ana Paula Breda; Susana Hoette; Rogério Souza
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  1 in total

1.  Association between sarcopenia and quality of life among adults aged ≥ 65 years from low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Lee Smith; Guillermo F López Sánchez; Nicola Veronese; Pinar Soysal; Karel Kostev; Louis Jacob; Hans Oh; Mark A Tully; Laurie Butler; Ali Davod Parsa; Soo Young Hwang; Jae Il Shin; Ai Koyanagi
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 4.481

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.