Literature DB >> 34433648

A Phase I Study of LSZ102, an Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader, with or without Ribociclib or Alpelisib, in Patients with Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.

Komal Jhaveri1, Dejan Juric2, Yoon-Sim Yap3, Sara Cresta4, Rachel M Layman5, Francois P Duhoux6, Catherine Terret7, Shunji Takahashi8, Jens Huober9, Nicole Kundamal10, Qing Sheng11, Alejandro Balbin11, Yan Ji11, Wei He11, Adam Crystal11, Serena De Vita11, Giuseppe Curigliano12.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Data are sparse for oral selective estrogen receptor (ER) degraders (SERD) in cancer treatment. The investigational oral SERD LSZ102 was assessed in monotherapy and combination use in a phase I study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A phase I, multicenter, open-label dose-escalation study (NCT02734615) of LSZ102 alone (arm A; n = 77) or with ribociclib (arm B; n = 78) or alpelisib (arm C; n = 43) in heavily pretreated adults with histologically confirmed ER-positive breast cancer and prior disease progression. Arm A received LSZ102 200-900 mg/day; arm B, LSZ102 200-600 mg/day plus ribociclib 300-600 mg/day; arm C, LSZ102 300-450 mg/day plus alpelisib 200-300 mg/day. Key outcomes were dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) in the first 28-day treatment cycle, adverse events (AE), laboratory parameters, pharmacokinetics, biopsy ER protein, and investigator-assessed clinical response (RECIST v1.1).
RESULTS: The most common AEs were gastrointestinal. Treatment-related serious AEs occurred in 10% of participants (19/198), mostly in arm C [10/43 (23%)]. DLTs occurred in: arm A, 5% (4/77); arm B, 3% (2/78); and arm C, 19% (8/43). LSZ102 exposure was slightly greater than dose proportional. On-treatment biopsy ER reductions were observed, with a trend toward an LSZ102 dose response. Objective response rates (95% confidence interval) were: arm A, 1.3% (0.0-7.0); arm B, 16.9% (9.3-27.1); and arm C, 7.0% (1.5-19.1), and clinical benefit rates 7.8% (2.9-16.2), 35.1% (24.5-46.8), and 20.9% (10.0-36.0), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: LSZ102 was well tolerated alone and with ribociclib and had a manageable safety profile with alpelisib. Preliminary clinical activity was observed in combination use. ©2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34433648     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  5 in total

1.  Update Breast Cancer 2021 Part 5 - Advanced Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Diana Lüftner; Florian Schütz; Elmar Stickeler; Peter A Fasching; Wolfgang Janni; Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke; Hans-Christian Kolberg; Christoph Thomssen; Volkmar Müller; Tanja N Fehm; Erik Belleville; Simon Bader; Michael Untch; Manfred Welslau; Marc Thill; Hans Tesch; Nina Ditsch; Michael P Lux; Achim Wöckel; Bahriye Aktas; Andreas Schneeweiss; Rachel Würstlein; Andreas D Hartkopf
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 2.  Targeted protein degradation: mechanisms, strategies and application.

Authors:  Lin Zhao; Jia Zhao; Kunhong Zhong; Aiping Tong; Da Jia
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2022-04-04

Review 3.  Endocrine therapy resistance: what we know and future directions.

Authors:  David Musheyev; Anya Alayev
Journal:  Explor Target Antitumor Ther       Date:  2022-08-31

Review 4.  Role of PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in mediating endocrine resistance: concept to clinic.

Authors:  Aglaia Skolariki; Jamie D'Costa; Martin Little; Simon Lord
Journal:  Explor Target Antitumor Ther       Date:  2022-04-24

Review 5.  The race to develop oral SERDs and other novel estrogen receptor inhibitors: recent clinical trial results and impact on treatment options.

Authors:  Yating Wang; Shou-Ching Tang
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 9.237

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.