Literature DB >> 34431111

Real-time respiratory motion compensated roadmaps for hepatic arterial interventions.

Martin G Wagner1, Sarvesh Periyasamy2, Colin Longhurst3, Matthew J McLachlan1, Joseph F Whitehead1, Michael A Speidel1,4, Paul F Laeseke2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: During hepatic arterial interventions, catheter or guidewire position is determined by referencing or overlaying a previously acquired static vessel roadmap. Respiratory motion leads to significant discrepancies between the true position and configuration of the hepatic arteries and the roadmap, which makes navigation and accurate catheter placement more challenging and time consuming. The purpose of this work was to develop a dynamic respiratory motion compensated device guidance system and evaluate the accuracy and real-time performance in an in vivo porcine liver model.
METHODS: The proposed device navigation system estimates a respiratory motion model for the hepatic vasculature from prenavigational X-ray image sequences acquired under free-breathing conditions with and without contrast enhancement. During device navigation, the respiratory state is tracked based on live fluoroscopic images and then used to estimate vessel deformation based on the previously determined motion model. Additionally, guidewires and catheters are segmented from the fluoroscopic images using a deep learning approach. The vessel and device information are combined and shown in a real-time display. Two different display modes are evaluated within this work: (1) a compensated roadmap display, where the vessel roadmap is shown moving with the respiratory motion; (2) an inverse compensated device display, where the device representation is compensated for respiratory motion and overlaid on a static roadmap. A porcine study including seven animals was performed to evaluate the accuracy and real-time performance of the system. In each pig, a guidewire and microcatheter with a radiopaque marker were navigated to distal branches of the hepatic arteries under fluoroscopic guidance. Motion compensated displays were generated showing real-time overlays of the vessel roadmap and intravascular devices. The accuracy of the motion model was estimated by comparing the estimated vessel motion to the motion of the X-ray visible marker.
RESULTS: The median (minimum, maximum) error across animals was 1.08 mm (0.92 mm, 1.87 mm). Across different respiratory states and vessel branch levels, the odds of the guidewire tip being shown in the correct vessel branch were significantly higher (odds ratio = 3.12, p < 0.0001) for motion compensated displays compared to a noncompensated display (median probabilities of 86 and 69%, respectively). The average processing time per frame was 17 ms.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed respiratory motion compensated device guidance system increased the accuracy of the displayed device position relative to the hepatic vasculature. Additionally, the provided display modes combine both vessel and device information and do not require the mental integration of different displays by the physician. The processing times were well within the range of conventional clinical frame rates.
© 2021 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  X-ray fluoroscopy; device tracking; registration; respiratory motion compensation; vessel roadmap

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34431111      PMCID: PMC8568648          DOI: 10.1002/mp.15187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.506


  29 in total

Review 1.  Motion compensation strategies in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ruud B van Heeswijk; Gabriele Bonanno; Simone Coppo; Andrew Coristine; Tobias Kober; Matthias Stuber
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2012

2.  Image-based respiratory motion compensation for fluoroscopic coronary roadmapping.

Authors:  Ying Zhu; Yanghai Tsin; Hari Sundar; Frank Sauer
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2010

3.  Motion compensated coronary interventional navigation by means of diaphragm tracking and elastic motion models.

Authors:  Holger Timinger; Sascha Krueger; Klaus Dietmayer; Joern Borgert
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-02-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Effects of latency on telesurgery: an experimental study.

Authors:  Reiza Rayman; Serguei Primak; Rajni Patel; Merhdad Moallem; Roya Morady; Mahdi Tavakoli; Vanja Subotic; Natalie Galbraith; Aimee van Wynsberghe; Kris Croome
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2005

5.  Identifying feeding arteries during TACE of hepatic tumors: comparison of C-arm CT and digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Jin Iwazawa; Shoichi Ohue; Takashi Mitani; Hisashi Abe; Naoko Hashimoto; Masao Hamuro; Kenji Nakamura
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Segmental nature of the porcine liver and its potential as a model for experimental partial hepatectomy.

Authors:  F G Court; S A Wemyss-Holden; C P Morrison; B D Teague; P E Laws; J Kew; A R Dennison; G J Maddern
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Using a saline chaser to decrease contrast media in abdominal CT.

Authors:  Paul J Dorio; Fred T Lee; Kevin P Henseler; Mark Pilot; Myron A Pozniak; Thomas C Winter; Sarah A Shock
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Riccardo Lencioni; Pasquale Petruzzi; Laura Crocetti
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.513

9.  Ultrasound Sensors for Diaphragm Motion Tracking: An Application in Non-Invasive Respiratory Monitoring.

Authors:  Amirhossein Shahshahani; Carl Laverdiere; Sharmistha Bhadra; Zeljko Zilic
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Assessment of tumor motion reproducibility with audio-visual coaching through successive 4D CT sessions.

Authors:  Samuel Goossens; Frédéric Senny; John A Lee; Guillaume Janssens; Xavier Geets
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.