| Literature DB >> 34429952 |
Seyed Muhammad Mehdi Ghaffari Hamedani1, Ali Akbari2, Sohrab Sayaydi2, Zakaria Zakariaei3, Mahmood Moosazadeh4, Javad Boskabadi5, Mahshid Naserifar6, Saeed Kargar Soliemanabad7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Inguinal hernia surgery is a common procedure, especially for the elderly, who usually use anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of tranexamic acid (TXA) on the complications of inguinal hernia repair in patients using antiplatelets. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study is a randomized controlled trial that was performed during the 2018-2019 years. Forty patients with inguinal hernia and antiplatelet use were enrolled randomly into the two groups. In the intervention group, the patients received two injectable form (500mg/5 mL) of TXA, totally 10 mL as a topical application at the surgical site, and then the patient's surgical site was seen every 8 h for 48 h, and the patient was examined daily for one week.Entities:
Keywords: Hematoma; Infection; Inguinal hernia; Seroma; Tranexamic acid
Year: 2021 PMID: 34429952 PMCID: PMC8365320 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102683
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) ISSN: 2049-0801
Fig. 1Study flowchart (CONSORT format).
Mean age of studied groups.
| Variable | Group | No | Mean ± SD | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age(years) | TXA | 40 | 56.9 ± 8.38 | 0.74 |
| Control | 40 | 56.32 ± 11.62 |
TXA; Tranexamic acid.
The frequency of the need for blood transfusions, seroma, hematoma and frequency of infection.
| Variables | TXA | Control | Total | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood transfusions | No. (%) | 1 (2.5) | 5(12.5) | 6(7.5) | 0.20 |
| Infection | No. (%) | 1(2.5) | 2(5) | 3(3.8) | 0.99 |
| Hematoma | No. (%) | 1(2.5) | 6 (15) | 7(8.8) | 0.10 |
| Seroma | No. (%) | 1(2.5) | 3 (7.5) | 4(0.5) | 0.61 |
TXA; Tranexamic acid.
Fig. 2Operation duration time (A) and length of hospitalization (B). There was no significant difference between the mean lengths of stay of the two studied groups (P > 0.05). But the operation duration in the recipient group was significantly less than in the control group (54.85 vs. 68.72 min) (P < 0.01).
Comparison of the control group with the intervention group: ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.
Fig. 3The rate of bleeding. The mean bleeding during operation in the recipient group was significantly less than group control (212.5 vs. 395.5 cc) (P < 0.001).
Comparison of the control group with the intervention group: ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.
Fig. 4This means hemoglobin before and after the surgery. There was not a significant difference in the mean hemoglobin before the surgery between the two studied groups (P > 0.50). But it was significantly more in the recipient group than in the control group after the surgery (14.69 vs. 13.73) (P > 0.05). Comparison of the control group with the intervention group: ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.