Literature DB >> 34427830

Incidence, predictors, and clinical outcomes of permanent pacemaker insertion following transcatheter aortic valve implantation in an Arab population.

Fares Tofailahmed Rajah1,2,3, Abdulkhaliq Ali Alaamiri1,4, Mohammed Mahmoodurrahman5, Thamer Saad Alhowaish3, Shaya Fahad Aldosari3, Abdulwahab Omer Hussain2,3,6, Emad Mohammad Masuadi3, Ahmed A Arifi2,3,7, Mohammed Ali Balgaith2,3,8, Kamal Mohammed Ayoub2,3,8, Fawaz Q Almutairi2,3,8, Haitham Ahmed Alanazi9,10,11,12.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Conduction defects requiring permanent pacemaker insertion (PPI) are one of the most common complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The purpose of this study was to identify the incidence and predictors of this complication as well as to assess clinical outcomes of patients requiring PPI after TAVI in an Arab population.
METHODS: In this single-center, retrospective cohort analysis, all patients who underwent TAVI from 2010 to 2018 were reviewed; seventy-four independent variables were collected per patient, and multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors. In-hospital outcomes were examined as well as 30-day and 1-year endpoints as defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2.
RESULTS: There were 48 of 170 patients (28.2%) who required PPI within 30 days of TAVI. The median time from TAVI to PPI was 2 days (interquartile range: 0 to 5 days). Positive predictors of 30-day PPI were prior right bundle branch block (odds ratio [OR]: 4.10; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37 to 0.79; p < 0.001), post-procedural development of new right bundle branch block (OR: 3.59; 95% CI: 1.07 to 12.03; p = 0.038), post-procedural development of new left bundle branch block (LBBB) (OR: 1.85; 95% CI: 1.21 to 2.84; p = 0.005), post-procedural prolongation of PR interval (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.02; p < 0.001), and post-procedural QRS duration (OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.03; p = 0.02). However, post-procedural development of new LBBB no longer remained a significant predictor of PPI after excluding six patients with LBBB who underwent prophylactic PPI (p = 0.093). Negative predictors of 30-day PPI were the presence of diabetes (OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 037 to 0.79; p = 0.001), the use of prosthesis size 29 compared to 23 (OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.87; p = 0.010), and the use of prosthesis size 26 compared to 23 (OR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.20 to 0.50; p < 0.001). PPI was associated with longer median hospital stay, but the result was borderline significant after multivariate adjustment (19 vs. 14 days; p = 0.052). There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day and 1-year clinical outcomes.
CONCLUSION: One-third of patients required PPI after TAVI. Several risk factors can identify patients at risk for PPI particularly pre-existing right bundle branch block. Further studies are needed to assess the association between PPI and negative clinical outcomes.
© 2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PPI; Permanent pacemaker implantation; Permanent pacemaker insertion; TAVI; Transcatheter aortic valve implantation; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34427830     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-021-01039-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  5 in total

1.  Pacemaker implantation rate after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with early and new-generation devices: a systematic review.

Authors:  Philippe J van Rosendael; Victoria Delgado; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Comparison of outcomes in new-generation versus early-generation heart valve in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tomo Ando; Hisato Takagi; Tesfaye Telila; Luis Afonso
Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med       Date:  2017-07-13

3.  A Comparative Study of TAVR versus SAVR in Moderate and High-Risk Surgical Patients: Hospital Outcome and Midterm Results.

Authors:  Ahmed Moustafa Ewiss Abdelgawad; Mohamed A Hussein; Hesham Naeim; Reda Abuelatta; Saleh Alghamdy
Journal:  Heart Surg Forum       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 0.676

4.  Permanent pacemaker implantation after transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Giuseppe D'Ancona; Miralem Pasic; Axel Unbehaun; Roland Hetzer
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-07-25

5.  Outcome of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high risk patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Hamdy Soliman; Khlid Alrabaat; Tarek Aboalaazm; Shaimaa Mostafa; Asaad Samy
Journal:  Egypt Heart J       Date:  2017-08-07
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Mid- to Long-Term Clinical and Echocardiographic Effects of Post-procedural Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shun Xu; Enrui Zhang; Zhiyong Qian; Jinyu Sun; Fengwei Zou; Yao Wang; Xiaofeng Hou; Jiangang Zou
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.