Literature DB >> 29420704

Pacemaker implantation rate after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with early and new-generation devices: a systematic review.

Philippe J van Rosendael1, Victoria Delgado1, Jeroen J Bax1.   

Abstract

Aims: The incidence of new-onset conduction abnormalities requiring permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with new-generation prostheses remains debated. This systematic review analyses the incidence of PPI after TAVI with new-generation devices and evaluates the electrical, anatomical, and procedural factors associated with PPI. In addition, the incidence of PPI after TAVI with early generation prostheses was reviewed for comparison. Methods and results: According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist, this systematic review screened original articles published between October 2010 and October 2017, reporting on the incidence of PPI after implantation of early and new-generation TAVI prostheses. Of the 1406 original articles identified in the first search for new-generation TAVI devices, 348 articles were examined for full text, and finally, 40 studies (n = 17 139) were included. The incidence of a PPI after the use of a new-generation TAVI prosthesis ranged between 2.3% and 36.1%. For balloon-expandable prostheses, the PPI rate remained low when using an early generation SAPIEN device (ranging between 2.3% and 28.2%), and with the new-generation SAPIEN 3 device, the PPI rate was between 4.0% and 24.0%. For self-expandable prostheses, the PPI rates were higher with the early generation CoreValve device (16.3-37.7%), and despite a reduction in PPI rates with the new Evolut R, the rates remained relatively higher (14.7-26.7%). When dividing the studies according to the highest (>26.0%) and the lowest (<12.1%) quintile of PPI rate, patients within the highest quintile were more frequently women when compared with the lowest quintile group (50.9% vs. 46.3%, P < 0.001). Pre-existent conduction abnormalities (electrical factor), calcification of the left ventricular outflow tract (anatomical factor), and balloon valvuloplasty and depth of implantation (procedural factors) were associated with increased risk of PPI.
Conclusion: The rate of PPI after TAVI with new-generation devices is highly variable. Specific recommendations for implantation of each prosthesis, taking into consideration the presence of pre-existent conduction abnormalities and anatomical factors, may be needed to reduce the risk of PPI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29420704     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  42 in total

Review 1.  Pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve: why is this still happening?

Authors:  Stefan Toggweiler; Richard Kobza
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  A Disruptive Technology: Determining Need for Permanent Pacing After TAVR.

Authors:  Amneet Sandhu; Wendy S Tzou
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Network meta-analysis of new-generation valves for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Hisato Takagi; Yosuke Hari; Kouki Nakashima; Toshiki Kuno; Tomo Ando
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 4.  [Postacute care after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)].

Authors:  Robert Michael Nechwatal; Kurt Bestehorn; Florian Leuschner; Andreas Hagendorff; Manju Guha; Axel Schlitt
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 1.443

5.  Leadless pacemaker implantation: A feasible and reasonable option in transcatheter heart valve replacement patients.

Authors:  Sarah K L Moore; Katherine H Chau; Salma Chaudhary; Geoffrey Rubin; Joseph Bayne; Uma Mahesh R Avula; Daniel Y Wang; Carmine Sorbera; Jose Dizon; Angelo Biviano; Marc Waase; Vivek Iyer; Isaac George; Susheel K Kodali; Tamim M Nazif; Hasan Garan; Elaine Y Wan
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  Small balloon strategy associated with low pacemaker implantation rate after self-expanding transcatheter valve implantation.

Authors:  Yuan Zhang; Wen-Zhi Pan; Li-Hua Guan; Xiao-Chun Zhang; Sha-Sha Chen; Li-Fan Yang; Lei Zhang; Ming-Fei Li; Dan-Dan Chen; Da-Xin Zhou; Jun-Bo Ge
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2021

7.  Predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis using Medtronic new generation self-expanding CoreValve Evolut R.

Authors:  Hidehiro Kaneko; Frank Hoelschermann; Martin Seifert; Grit Tambor; Maki Okamoto; Viviane Moeller; Michael Neuss; Christian Butter
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  A meta-analysis comparing transaxillary and transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Yong Zhan; Siavash Saadat; Avneet Soin; Masashi Kawabori; Frederick Y Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Impact of postprocedural permanent pacemaker implantation on clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ziwei Xi; Tong Liu; Jing Liang; Yu-Jie Zhou; Wei Liu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Clinical outcomes after implantation of a sutureless aortic bioprosthesis with concomitant mitral valve surgery: the SURE-AVR registry.

Authors:  Max Baghai; Mattia Glauber; Raphael Fontaine; Jose Cuenca Castillo; Antony H Walker; Ugolino Livi; José Montiel; Alistair Royse; Gianluigi Bisleri; Davide Pacini; Vincenzo Argano; Aurelien Roumy; George Asimakopoulos; Marco Solinas
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 1.637

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.