Literature DB >> 34423521

Paediatric oral sensorimotor interventions for chewing dysfunction: A scoping review.

Erin Wilson1, Meg Simione2,3, Lydia Polley4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chewing dysfunction can have adverse effects on growth, development and quality of life. There is a lack of evidence-based consensus guidelines for sensorimotor intervention. To address this, we need to understand the current state of the science in clinical sensorimotor interventions for paediatric chewing dysfunction and systematically plan a research agenda and priorities for the field. AIMS: The purpose of this scoping review was to examine the extent, range and nature of evidence for oral sensorimotor interventions for paediatric chewing dysfunction. METHODS & PROCEDURES: This scoping review entailed five phases that included: identification of the research question; identification of relevant studies; study selection; data charting; and collation, summarization and report of the results. Treatment studies that were peer-reviewed and written in English were included. All studies involved a paediatric population and included an oral sensorimotor and/or chewing intervention. Information regarding study design, population, intervention, comparator, outcome measures and findings were extracted. MAIN CONTRIBUTION: Of the 21 studies included in this scoping review, 53% were specific to children with cerebral palsy. All interventions were multi-component in nature and the treatment studies included a range of study designs, but few were controlled trials with comparators. A wide variety of outcomes measures were used within and across studies to determine treatment effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: The findings suggest that in a small number of studies, sensorimotor interventions provide preliminary evidence for effectiveness in specific populations. These and other treatment protocols must be trialled in additional clinical populations and settings to improve the evidence base for sensorimotor treatment of paediatric chewing dysfunction. This review also serves to help prioritize research agendas and further motivates the need for consensus-based clinical guidelines for paediatric chewing treatment. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on the subject Paediatric feeding disorders are highly prevalent and children often have chewing dysfunction that results in significant negative consequences. We lack evidence-based sensorimotor treatment approaches for chewing dysfunction, which directly impacts the care clinicians can provide children. What this study adds to existing knowledge This scoping review is the first step in examining the literature to understand the current state of the science for oral sensorimotor interventions for paediatric chewing dysfunction. Few randomized controlled studies were identified and a majority included children with cerebral palsy. Most of the interventions were multi-component and included a variety of treatment approaches. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The results of this scoping review can be used as an initial reference for clinicians selecting treatment approaches for chewing dysfunction. It also serves to help prioritize research agendas and further motivates the need for consensus-based clinical guidelines for paediatric chewing treatment.
© 2021 Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dysphagia; feeding; mastication; paediatrics; scoping review

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34423521      PMCID: PMC8585681          DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord        ISSN: 1368-2822            Impact factor:   3.020


  69 in total

Review 1.  Feeding interventions for children with cerebral palsy: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Laurie Snider; Annette Majnemer; Vasiliki Darsaklis
Journal:  Phys Occup Ther Pediatr       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 2.360

2.  Development and content validation of the Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool (Pedi-EAT).

Authors:  Suzanne M Thoyre; Britt F Pados; Jinhee Park; Hayley Estrem; Eric A Hodges; Cara McComish; Marcia Van Riper; Kimberly Murdoch
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  Classifying complex pediatric feeding disorders.

Authors:  K A Burklow; A N Phelps; J R Schultz; K McConnell; C Rudolph
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.839

Review 4.  Feeding Disorders.

Authors:  Natalie Morris; Rachel M Knight; Teryn Bruni; Laura Sayers; Amy Drayton
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am       Date:  2017-07

5.  Mealtime behaviors of young children: a comparison of normative and clinical data.

Authors:  W Crist; A Napier-Phillips
Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.225

6.  Using non-nutritive sucking to support feeding development for premature infants: A commentary on approaches and current practice.

Authors:  C Harding; H Cockerill; C Cane; J Law
Journal:  J Pediatr Rehabil Med       Date:  2018

Review 7.  Evidence to support treatment options for children with swallowing and feeding disorders: A systematic review.

Authors:  Memorie M Gosa; Hillary T Carden; Courtney C Jacks; Amy Y Threadgill; Tara C Sidlovsky
Journal:  J Pediatr Rehabil Med       Date:  2017-05-19

8.  Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda.

Authors:  Enola Proctor; Hiie Silmere; Ramesh Raghavan; Peter Hovmand; Greg Aarons; Alicia Bunger; Richard Griffey; Melissa Hensley
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2011-03

9.  Correlates of specific childhood feeding problems.

Authors:  D Field; M Garland; K Williams
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.954

Review 10.  Assessment of pediatric dysphagia and feeding disorders: clinical and instrumental approaches.

Authors:  Joan C Arvedson
Journal:  Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2008
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric dysphagia overview: best practice recommendation study by multidisciplinary experts.

Authors:  Ebru Umay; Sibel Eyigor; Esra Giray; Evrim Karadag Saygi; Bulent Karadag; Nihal Durmus Kocaaslan; Deniz Yuksel; Arzu Meltem Demir; Engin Tutar; Canan Tikiz; Eda Gurcay; Zeliha Unlu; Pelin Celik; Ece Unlu Akyuz; Guven Mengu; Serkan Bengisu; Sibel Alicura; Necati Unver; Nida Yekteusaklari; Cuma Uz; Merve Cikili Uytun; Fatih Bagcier; Elif Tarihci; Mazlum Serdar Akaltun; Iclal Ayranci Sucakli; Damla Cankurtaran; Zeynep Aykın; Resa Aydın; Fatma Nazli
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 9.186

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.