| Literature DB >> 34423308 |
Catherine Do1,2,3, Joshua DeAguero1,4, Adrian Brearley5, Xochitl Trejo6, Tamara Howard4, G Patricia Escobar1,2,4, Brent Wagner1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) have provided much needed image enhancement in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) important in the advancement of disease diagnosis and treatment. The paramagnetic properties of ionized gadolinium have facilitated these advancements, but ionized gadolinium carries toxicity risk. GBCAs were formulated with organic chelates designed to reduce these toxicity risks from unbound gadolinium ions. They were preferred over iodinated contrast used in computed tomography and considered safe for use. As their use expanded, the development of new diseases associated with their use (including nephrogenic systemic fibrosis) has drawn more attention and ultimately caution with their clinical administration in those with impaired renal function. Use of GBCAs in those with preserved renal function was considered to be safe. However, in this new era with emerging clinical and experimental evidence of brain gadolinium deposition in those with repeated exposure, these safety assumptions are once again brought into question. This review article aims to add new perspectives in thinking about the role of GBCA in current clinical use. The new information begs for further discussion and consideration of the risk-benefit ratio of use of GBCAs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 34423308 PMCID: PMC8378745 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0000272019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Kidney360 ISSN: 2641-7650