Literature DB >> 28653860

Gadolinium Deposition in Human Brain Tissues after Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging in Adult Patients without Intracranial Abnormalities.

Robert J McDonald1, Jennifer S McDonald1, David F Kallmes1, Mark E Jentoft1, Michael A Paolini1, David L Murray1, Eric E Williamson1, Laurence J Eckel1.   

Abstract

Purpose To determine whether gadolinium deposits in neural tissues of patients with intracranial abnormalities following intravenous gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) exposure might be related to blood-brain barrier integrity by studying adult patients with normal brain pathologic characteristics. Materials and Methods After obtaining antemortem consent and institutional review board approval, the authors compared postmortem neuronal tissue samples from five patients who had undergone four to 18 gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) examinations between 2005 and 2014 (contrast group) with samples from 10 gadolinium-naive patients who had undergone at least one MR examination during their lifetime (control group). All patients in the contrast group had received gadodiamide. Neuronal tissues from the dentate nuclei, pons, globus pallidus, and thalamus were harvested and analyzed with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), transmission electron microscopy with energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy, and light microscopy to quantify, localize, and assess the effects of gadolinium deposition. Results Tissues from the four neuroanatomic regions of gadodiamide-exposed patients contained 0.1-19.4 μg of gadolinium per gram of tissue in a statistically significant dose-dependent relationship (globus pallidus: ρ = 0.90, P = .04). In contradistinction, patients in the control group had undetectable levels of gadolinium with ICP-MS. All patients had normal brain pathologic characteristics at autopsy. Three patients in the contrast group had borderline renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min/1.73 m2) and hepatobiliary dysfunction at MR examination. Gadolinium deposition in the contrast group was localized to the capillary endothelium and neuronal interstitium and, in two cases, within the nucleus of the cell. Conclusion Gadolinium deposition in neural tissues after GBCA administration occurs in the absence of intracranial abnormalities that might affect the permeability of the blood-brain barrier. These findings challenge current understanding of the biodistribution of these contrast agents and their safety. © RSNA, 2017.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28653860     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017161595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  79 in total

1.  Nonhomogeneous Gadolinium Retention in the Cerebral Cortex after Intravenous Administration of Gadolinium-based Contrast Agent in Rats and Humans.

Authors:  Olga Minaeva; Ning Hua; Erich S Franz; Nicola Lupoli; Asim Z Mian; Chad W Farris; Audrey M Hildebrandt; Patrick T Kiernan; Laney E Evers; Allison D Griffin; Xiuping Liu; Sarah E Chancellor; Katharine J Babcock; Juliet A Moncaster; Hernan Jara; Victor E Alvarez; Bertrand R Huber; Ali Guermazi; Lawrence L Latour; Ann C McKee; Jorge A Soto; Stephan W Anderson; Lee E Goldstein
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Safety issues related to intravenous contrast agent use in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Skorn Ponrartana; Michael M Moore; Sherwin S Chan; Teresa Victoria; Jonathan R Dillman; Govind B Chavhan
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-04-19

3.  Brain tissue gadolinium retention in pediatric patients after contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance exams: pathological confirmation.

Authors:  A Luana Stanescu; Dennis W Shaw; Nozomu Murata; Kiyoko Murata; Joe C Rutledge; Ezekiel Maloney; Kenneth R Maravilla
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2020-01-27

4.  Tumor Contrast Enhancement and Whole-Body Elimination of the Manganese-Based Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent Mn-PyC3A.

Authors:  Derek J Erstad; Ian A Ramsay; Veronica Clavijo Jordan; Mozhdeh Sojoodi; Bryan C Fuchs; Kenneth K Tanabe; Peter Caravan; Eric M Gale
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 5.  Gadolinium-based contrast agents: why nephrologists need to be concerned.

Authors:  Katarina Leyba; Brent Wagner
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Arterial spin labeling MR imaging for differentiation between high- and low-grade glioma-a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alberto Falk Delgado; Francesca De Luca; Danielle van Westen; Anna Falk Delgado
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  Half-dose versus full-dose macrocyclic gadolinium at 3-T magnetic resonance imaging in paediatric bone and soft-tissue disease.

Authors:  Giovanna Stefania Colafati; Enrica Rossi; Chiara Carducci; Simone Piga; Ioan Paul Voicu; Angela Mastronuzzi; Paolo Tomà
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-07-25

Review 8.  Gadolinium deposition and the potential for toxicological sequelae - A literature review of issues surrounding gadolinium-based contrast agents.

Authors:  Kerry A Layne; Paul I Dargan; John R H Archer; David M Wood
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 9.  Gadolinium-based contrast agents in children.

Authors:  Michael N Rozenfeld; Daniel J Podberesky
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-08-04

10.  Physicians' awareness of gadolinium retention and MRI timing practices in the longitudinal management of pituitary tumors: a "Pituitary Society" survey.

Authors:  Lisa B Nachtigall; Niki Karavitaki; Katja Kiseljak-Vassiliades; Luma Ghalib; Hidenori Fukuoka; Luis V Syro; Daniel Kelly; Maria Fleseriu
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.