| Literature DB >> 34423031 |
Yu-Lin Shi1, Jia-Yi Liu1, Xiao-Juan Hu2, Li-Ping Tu1, Ji Cui1, Jun Li1, Zi-Juan Bi1, Jia-Cai Li1, Ling Xu3, Jia-Tuo Xu1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the data characteristics of tongue and pulse of non-small-cell lung cancer with Qi deficiency syndrome and Yin deficiency syndrome, establish syndrome classification model based on data of tongue and pulse by using machine learning methods, and evaluate the feasibility of syndrome classification based on data of tongue and pulse.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34423031 PMCID: PMC8373490 DOI: 10.1155/2021/1337558
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Flowchart.
Figure 2TFDA-1 digital tongue diagnosis instrument: (a) front view; (b) profile view.
Figure 3Tongue diagnosis analysis system (TDAS v2.0) of TFDA-1 digital tongue diagnosis instrument.
Figure 4PDA-1 digital pulse diagnosis instrument and its corresponding sphygmogram: (a) PDA-1 digital pulse diagnosis instrument; (b) sphygmogram.
Basic statistical analysis.
| Characteristic | Healthy controls ( | Qi deficiency syndrome ( | Yin deficiency syndrome ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex, | Male | 96 (52.17) | 72 (44.17) | 89 (51.15) |
| Female | 88 (47.83) | 91 (55.83) | 85 (48.85) | |
| Age, years | 27.00 (29.00-24.25) | 67.00 (59.00-71.00)∗∗ | 67.00 (60.00-72.00)∗∗ | |
vs. healthy controls, ∗∗P < 0.01.
Statistical analysis of tongue diagnosis data (mean (SD), median (P25, P75)).
| Domain | Color space | Index | Healthy controls ( | Qi deficiency syndrome ( | Yin deficiency syndrome ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TB | Lab | TB-L | 103.99 (100.81-108.79) | 96.31 (75.15-102.89)∗∗ | 99.83 (80.51-103.24)∗∗ |
| TB-a | 19.98 ± 2.82 | 19.31 ± 3.81 | 21.06 ± 4.23∗## | ||
| TB-b | 4.76 (0.82-7.00) | 7.04 (5.47-8.28)∗∗ | 7.04 (5.47-8.28)∗∗ | ||
| HIS | TB-H | 176.22 (168.50-180.95) | 180.00 (177.98-182.83)∗∗ | 180.00 (177.98-182.83)∗∗ | |
| TB-S | 0.17 (0.16-0.20) | 0.17 (0.15-0.19) | 0.17 (0.15-0.19)∗## | ||
| TB-I | 117.00 (108.00-132.00) | 116.00 (109.00-126.00)∗∗ | 116.00 (109.00-126.00) | ||
| YCrCb | TB-Y | 114.98 (107.03-126.56) | 114.35 (106.900-123.72) | 114.35 (106.900-123.72)∗ | |
| TB-Cr | 151.41 ± 3.05 | 152.29 ± 3.89 | 154.15 ± 4.44∗∗## | ||
| TB-Cb | 121.61 (119.75-124.82) | 119.84 (118.53-120.99)∗∗ | 119.27 (118.09-120.57)∗∗ | ||
| Texture index | TB-CON | 71.47 (46.96-99.54) | 74.56 (48.28-94.64) | 60.96 (45.32-86.08) | |
| TB-ASM | 0.08 (0.07-0.10) | 0.07 (0.07-0.09) | 0.09 (0.07-0.10) | ||
| TB-MEAN | 0.03 (0.02-0.03) | 0.03 (0.02-0.03) | 0.02 (0.02-0.03) | ||
| TB-ENT | 1.21 (1.11-1.28) | 1.22 (1.12-1.28) | 1.17 (1.10-1.25) | ||
| TC | Lab | TC-L | 109.24 (104.97-113.54) | 89.38 (76.22-104.87)∗∗ | 95.35 (82.53-105.08)∗∗ |
| TC-a | 12.31 ± 2.69 | 12.75 ± 3.21 | 14.25 ± 3.78∗∗## | ||
| TC-b | 2.71(-1.16-5.32) | 5.59 (4.24-6.62)∗∗ | 5.86 (4.35-7.26)∗∗ | ||
| HIS | TC-H | 176.70 (162.43-183.25) | 183.00 (180.00-186.35)∗∗ | 182.58 (178.64-185.72)∗∗ | |
| TC-S | 0.11 (0.09-0.13) | 0.12 (0.10-0.14)∗ | 0.13 (0.11-0.17)∗∗## | ||
| TC-I | 130.00 (117.00-142.75) | 119.00 (99.00-135.00)∗∗ | 115.00 (92.75-133.00)∗∗ | ||
| YCrCb | TC-Y | 126.78 (115.63-137.70) | 118.65 (99.72-132.07)∗∗ | 114.02 (95.19-129.53)∗∗ | |
| TC-Cr | 142.89 (140.89-145.181) | 143.97 (142.27-146.51)∗∗ | 145.49 (143.00-148.79)∗∗## | ||
| TC-Cb | 123.90 (121.54-127.61) | 121.36 (120.34-122.81)∗∗ | 121.35 (120.01-122.67)∗∗ | ||
| Area index | perAll | 0.54 (0.43-0.69) | 0.44 (0.34-0.50)∗∗ | 0.38 (0.21-0.50)∗∗# | |
| perPart | 1.09 (1.02-1.22) | 1.24 (1.11-1.42)∗∗ | 1.28 (1.11-1.57)∗∗ | ||
| Texture index | TC-CON | 89.27 (62.31-124.17) | 83.13 (63.82-123.30) | 71.53 (44.56-115.98)∗∗## | |
| TC-ASM | 0.07 (0.06-0.08) | 0.07 (0.06-0.08) | 0.08 (0.06-0.10)∗∗## | ||
| TC-MEAN | 0.03 (0.02-0.03) | 0.03 (0.02-0.03) | 0.03 (0.02-0.03)∗∗## | ||
| TC-ENT | 1.26 (1.18-1.34) | 1.25 (1.18-1.34) | 1.21 (1.09-1.31)∗∗## |
vs. healthy controls, ∗P < 0.05, vs. healthy controls, ∗∗P < 0.01. vs. Qi deficiency syndrome, #P < 0.05, vs. Qi deficiency syndrome, ##P < 0.01.
Statistical analysis of pulse diagnosis data (mean (SD), median (P25, P75)).
| Index | Healthy controls ( | Qi deficiency syndrome ( | Yin deficiency syndrome ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.13 (0.12-0.14) | 0.14 (0.13-0.15)∗∗ | 0.14 (0.13-0.14)∗∗ | |
| 0.34 (0.32-0.36) | 0.37 (0.35-0.39)∗∗ | 0.37 (0.34-0.39)∗∗# | |
| 0.41 (0.39-0.42) | 0.43 (0.41-0.46)∗∗ | 0.42 (0.40-0.44)∗∗## | |
| 0.80 (0.75-0.88) | 0.86 (0.76-0.97)∗∗ | 0.84 (0.72-0.94) | |
| 13.89 (11.53-16.41) | 10.99 (7.62-15.42)∗∗ | 11.56 (8.86-16.51)∗∗ | |
| 8.48 (6.56-10.59) | 6.64 (4.38-10.07)∗∗ | 7.18 (4.85-10.12)∗∗ | |
| 5.21 (4.18-6.32) | 2.18 (1.37-3.24)∗∗ | 2.53 (1.44-3.50)∗∗ | |
| 0.50 (0.15-0.95) | 0.23 (0.05-0.69)∗∗ | 0.21 (0.05-0.60)∗∗ | |
| 0.62 (0.52-0.70) | 0.61 (0.53-0.71) | 0.60 (0.49-0.73) | |
| 4.43 (3.49-5.35) | 3.22 (2.26-4.57)∗∗ | 3.45 (2.68-4.82)∗∗ | |
| 0.38 (0.32-0.43) | 0.21 (0.12-0.31)∗∗ | 0.21 (0.14-0.28)∗∗ | |
| 0.16 (0.14-0.17) | 0.16 (0.14-0.19) | 0.17 (0.14-0.19) | |
| 0.83 (0.80-0.88) | 0.86 (0.82-0.91)∗∗ | 0.87 (0.82-0.91)∗∗ | |
| 0.20 (0.15-0.23) | 0.21 (0.19-0.23)∗∗ | 0.21 (0.19-0.23)∗∗ | |
| 0.12 (0.10-0.16) | 0.15 (0.13-0.18)∗∗ | 0.15 (0.13-0.18)∗∗ |
vs. healthy controls, ∗P < 0.05, vs. healthy controls, ∗∗P < 0.01. vs. Qi deficiency syndrome, #P < 0.05, vs. Qi deficiency syndrome, ##P < 0.01.
Figure 5Heat map of tongue and pulse correlation analysis of Qi deficiency syndrome.
Correlation analysis of tongue data and pulse data of Qi deficiency syndrome.
| Index | perAll | TC-CON | TC-ASM | TC-ENT | TC-MEAN | TB-S | TC-S | TB-a | TC-a | TB-Cr | TC-Cr |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| perAll | 1.00 | ||||||||||||
| TC-CON | 0.16∗ | 1.00 | |||||||||||
| TC-ASM | -0.14 | -0.99∗∗ | 1.00 | ||||||||||
| TC-ENT | 0.16∗ | 1.00∗∗ | -0.99∗∗ | 1.00 | |||||||||
| TC-MEAN | 0.14 | 1.00∗∗ | -1.00∗∗ | 1.00∗∗ | 1.00 | ||||||||
| TB-S | -0.31∗∗ | -0.32∗∗ | 0.33∗∗ | -0.33∗∗ | -0.33∗∗ | 1.00 | |||||||
| TC-S | -0.36∗∗ | -0.32∗∗ | 0.32∗∗ | -0.32∗∗ | -0.32∗∗ | 0.60∗∗ | 1.00 | ||||||
| TB-a | -0.36∗∗ | -0.21∗∗ | 0.21∗∗ | -0.22∗∗ | -0.21∗∗ | 0.51∗∗ | 0.59∗∗ | 1.00 | |||||
| TC-a | -0.40∗∗ | -0.23∗∗ | 0.22∗∗ | -0.23∗∗ | -0.23∗∗ | 0.51∗∗ | 0.80∗∗ | 0.78∗∗ | 1.00 | ||||
| TB-Cr | -0.52∗∗ | -0.15 | 0.14 | -0.16∗ | -0.15 | 0.41∗∗ | 0.47∗∗ | 0.82∗∗ | 0.64∗∗ | 1.00 | |||
| TC-Cr | -0.53∗∗ | -0.03 | -0.00 | -0.02 | -0.01 | 0.28∗∗ | 0.50∗∗ | 0.48∗∗ | 0.71∗∗ | 0.70∗∗ | 1.00 | ||
|
| 0.11 | 0.17∗ | -0.18∗ | 0.18∗ | 0.18∗ | -0.12 | 0.01 | -0.06 | -0.05 | -0.08 | -0.06 | 1.00 | |
|
| 0.11 | 0.12 | -0.13 | 0.12 | 0.12 | -0.07 | -0.08 | -0.10 | -0.13 | -0.16∗ | -0.12 | 0.58∗∗ | 1.00 |
∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01.
Figure 6Heat map of tongue and pulse correlation analysis of Yin deficiency syndrome.
Correlation analysis of tongue data and pulse data of Yin deficiency syndrome.
| Index | perAll | TC-CON | TC-ASM | TC-ENT | TC-MEAN | TB-S | TC-S | TB-a | TC-a | TB-Cr | TC-Cr |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| perAll | 1.00 | ||||||||||||
| TC-CON | 0.27∗∗ | 1.00 | |||||||||||
| TC-ASM | -0.34∗∗ | -0.95∗∗ | 1.00 | ||||||||||
| TC-ENT | 0.34∗∗ | 0.96∗∗ | -1.00∗∗ | 1.00 | |||||||||
| TC-MEAN | 0.27∗∗ | 0.98∗∗ | -0.97∗∗ | 0.97∗∗ | 1.00 | ||||||||
| TB-S | -0.59∗∗ | -0.40∗∗ | 0.45∗∗ | -0.45∗∗ | -0.41∗∗ | 1.00 | |||||||
| TC-S | -0.62∗∗ | -0.52∗∗ | 0.57∗∗ | -0.58∗∗ | -0.53∗∗ | 0.75∗∗ | 1.00 | ||||||
| TB-a | -0.64∗∗ | -0.33∗∗ | 0.38∗∗ | -0.39∗∗ | -0.33∗∗ | 0.70∗∗ | 0.73∗∗ | 1.00 | |||||
| TC-a | -0.62∗∗ | -0.48∗∗ | 0.50∗∗ | -0.51∗∗ | -0.46∗∗ | 0.67∗∗ | 0.83∗∗ | 0.82∗∗ | 1.00 | ||||
| TB-Cr | -0.79∗∗ | -0.27∗∗ | 0.34∗ | -0.34∗∗ | -0.28∗∗ | 0.64∗∗ | 0.69∗∗ | 0.89∗∗ | 0.75∗∗ | 1.00 | |||
| TC-Cr | -0.67∗∗ | -0.180∗ | 0.19∗ | -0.20∗∗ | -0.15 | 0.43∗∗ | 0.56∗∗ | 0.59∗∗ | 0.74∗∗ | 0.75∗∗ | 1.00 | ||
|
| -0.03 | 0.10 | -0.14 | 0.13 | 0.13 | -0.10 | -0.09 | -0.10 | -0.14 | -0.08 | -0.08 | 1.00 | |
|
| 0.15 | 0.18 | -0.20∗∗ | 0.20 | 0.19∗ | -0.21∗∗ | -0.27∗∗ | -0.23∗∗ | -0.33∗∗ | -0.21∗∗ | -0.23∗∗ | 0.73∗∗ | 1.00 |
∗∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01.
Performance of models for detecting Qi deficiency syndrome of NSCLC based on different datasets.
| Datasets | Model | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity | F1 | Precision | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Symptom | Neural network | 0.9223 | 0.9063 | 0.8286 | 0.8657 | 0.8286 | 0.8657 |
| SVM | 0.9321 | 0.8750 | 0.8857 | 0.8750 | 0.8750 | 0.8806 | |
| Logistic regression | 0.9000 | 0.8125 | 0.8286 | 0.8125 | 0.8125 | 0.8209 | |
| Random forest | 0.9116 | 0.7813 | 0.8571 | 0.8065 | 0.8333 | 0.8209 | |
| Tongue & pulse | Neural network | 0.7677 | 0.6316 | 0.6897 | 0.6761 | 0.7273 | 0.6567 |
| SVM | 0.7455 | 0.6842 | 0.6552 | 0.7027 | 0.7222 | 0.6716 | |
| Logistic regression | 0.8022 | 0.6842 | 0.8276 | 0.7536 | 0.8387 | 0.7463 | |
| Random forest | 0.7314 | 0.5263 | 0.8621 | 0.6452 | 0.8333 | 0.6716 | |
| Symptom & tongue & pulse | Neural network | 0.9401 | 0.9310 | 0.8421 | 0.8710 | 0.8182 | 0.8806 |
| SVM | 0.9328 | 0.6552 | 0.9737 | 0.7755 | 0.9500 | 0.8358 | |
| Logistic regression | 0.9301 | 0.7931 | 0.8684 | 0.8070 | 0.8214 | 0.8358 | |
| Random forest | 0.9229 | 0.8966 | 0.8421 | 0.8525 | 0.8125 | 0.8657 |
Figure 7ROC curves of Qi deficiency syndrome model based on symptom.
Figure 8ROC curves of Qi deficiency syndrome model based on tongue and pulse.
Figure 9ROC curves of Qi deficiency syndrome model based on syndrome and tongue and pulse.