| Literature DB >> 34422973 |
Tobias Braun1,2, Laura Sünner2, Maaike Hachenberger1,2, Clemens Müller3, Astrid Wietelmann4, Martin Juenemann1,2, Jörn Pons-Kühnemann5, Manfred Kaps1, Tibo Gerriets1,2,6, Marlene Tschernatsch1,2,6, Joachim Roth7, Mesut Yenigün1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Early recanalization of an occluded vessel is associated with a better clinical outcome in acute ischemic stroke. Intravenous thrombolysis using recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is only available in a minority of patients and often fails to reopen the occluded vessel. Mechanical recanalization is more effective in this matter but only available for selected patients when a thrombectomy centre can be reached. Therefore, sonothrombolysis might represent an alternative or complementary approach. Here, we tested microbubble-mediated sonothrombolysis (mmSTL) in a thromboembolic stroke model for middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) in rats.Entities:
Keywords: Embolic stroke; microbubbles; rat; sonothrombolysis; ultrasound (US)
Year: 2021 PMID: 34422973 PMCID: PMC8339866 DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-75
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Transl Med ISSN: 2305-5839
Distribution of surviving animals in the different treatment groups
| Group | Number of surviving animals |
|---|---|
| Placebo | 3 |
| US | 6 |
| rt-PA | 6 |
| US + rt-PA | 5 |
US, ultrasound; rt-PA, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator.
Figure 1Mean value with standard deviation of the NeuroScore 24 hours after the thrombus induction. There is no significant difference between the four treatment groups (P>0.05). US, ultrasound; rt-PA, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator.
Figure 2Mean value with standard deviation of the rotarod test in rpm. The values show the difference between the first (preoperative) and second (postoperative) point of measurement. There is no significant difference between the four treatment groups (P>0.05). rpm, rounds per minute. US, ultrasound; rt-PA, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator.
Figure 3Mean value with standard deviation of the absolute infarct size in cm3 90 minutes after thrombus induction. There is no significant difference between the four treatment groups (P>0.05). US, ultrasound; rt-PA, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator.
Figure 4Mean value with standard deviation of the infarct size as percentage of ipsilateral hemispheric volume 90 minutes after thrombus induction. There is no significant difference between the four treatment groups (P>0.05). US, ultrasound; rt-PA, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator.
Figure 5Examples of T2-weighted images of the infarct volume for the four different treatment groups. (A) Placebo; (B) US; (C) rt-PA; (D) US + rt-PA. US, ultrasound; rt-PA, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator.
Figure 6Mean value with standard deviation of the absolute infarct size in cm3 24 hours after thrombus induction. There is a significant difference between Placebo and US (P=0.016), Placebo and rt-PA (P=0.09), and Placebo and US + rt-PA (P=0.001). Asterisks are used to mark P values below 0.05. US, ultrasound; rt-PA, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator.
Figure 7Mean value with standard deviation of the infarct size as percentage of ipsilateral hemispheric volume 24 hours after thrombus induction. There is a significant difference between Placebo and US (P=0.012), Placebo and rt-PA (P=0.006), and Placebo and US + rt-PA (P=0.001). Asterisks are used to mark P values below 0.05. US, ultrasound; rt-PA, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator.