| Literature DB >> 34422822 |
Jinsheng Zhu1, Li Zhao1, Yadan Hu1, Guoqi Cui1, Ang Luo1, Changlei Bao1, Ying Han2, Tong Zhou3, Wenju Lu4, Jian Wang4, Stephen M Black5,6,7, Haiyang Tang1,4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: HIF2α is of vital importance in the regulation of endothelial dysfunction, cell proliferation, migration, and pulmonary vascular remodeling in pulmonary hypertension. Our previous studies demonstrated that conditional and inducible deletion of HIF2α in mouse lung endothelial cells, dramatically protected the mice against vascular remodeling and the development of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Here, we provide a novel transcriptome insight into the impact of HIF2α in PAH pathogenesis and the potential to use HIF2α-mediated gene sets to differentiate PAH human subjects.Entities:
Keywords: HIF2α; PHD2; hypoxia; microarray; pulmonary arterial hypertension
Year: 2021 PMID: 34422822 PMCID: PMC8375387 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.701247
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol ISSN: 2296-634X
FIGURE 1GO biological process analysis in Hif2a-KD VHL-deficient human ccRCC cells and PAH patients. (A) The top 20 GO biological process terms associated with the genes up-regulated in Hif2a-KD VHL-deficient human ccRCC cells. Fisher’s exact test was adopted to calculate the P-values which was then corrected by Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. The significance level of 0.05 was denoted by the dash line. (B) The top 20 GO biological process terms associated with the genes down-regulated in Hif2a-KD cells. The P-values were calculated by Fisher’s exact test and corrected by Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. The dash line denotes the significance level of 0.05. All the GO gene sets listed are statistically significant except the last term, “GO:0030218∼erythrocyte differentiation.” (C) Gene set score heatmap of the HIF2α-mediated GO biological process terms in human lungs. In total, 14 GO terms up-regulated in lung tissues from PAH patients were listed. Red and blue represent relative up-regulation and down-regulation of gene expression, respectively.
FIGURE 2The HIF2α-mediated GO terms distinguish PAH patients from controls in the lung validation data sets. (A,B) Principal component analysis on the HIF2α-mediated GO terms in the validation cohorts (A,B), respectively. PC1 and PC2 represent the first principal component and the second principal component, respectively. (C) PC2 differentiates the PAH patients from the controls in the validation cohorts. (D) The ROC curves of PC2 in distinguishing PAH patients from controls in the validation cohorts. CTR, control; PAH, pulmonary arterial hypertension.
FIGURE 3Gene set score heatmap of the HIF2α-mediated GO biological process terms in human PBMCs. (A) Superior predictive power of the HIF2α-mediated GO terms compared with randomized pattern. The histogram shows the distribution of the mean of AUC (both the validation cohorts A,B) for the 1,000 resampled GO term sets (The same size as the HIF2α-mediated GO terms, i.e., 14 GO terms). The mean of AUC of the 14 HIF2α-mediated GO terms is marked with black triangle. Right-tailed P-value was generated from sampling distribution. (B) In total, 13 GO terms up-regulated in PBMCs from PAH patients were listed. Red and blue represent relative up-regulation and down-regulation of gene expression, respectively.
FIGURE 4HIF2α-mediated GO terms involved in the development of Phd2-KO mediated spontaneous PH. (A) A representative waveform shows RVP (left) and statistical data (right) represents peak RVSP in WT, Phd2 and Phd2 mice (n = 6). Scale bars = 0.2 sec. (B) Statistical data of the RV/(LV + S) ratio shows RV hypertrophy defined by the Fulton index as a ratio [RV/(LV + S)] in WT, Phd2 and Phd2 mice (n = 6). (C) Typical H & E images of pulmonary arterioles from WT, Phd2 and Phd2 mice. Scale bars = 10 μm. (D) Statistical data shows PA wall thickness that generated by the ratio of wall area to total vessel area in PAs which were restricted less than 100 μm in diameter from WT, Phd2 or Phd2 mice (n = 6). (E) Expression heatmap of the genes commonly deregulated in both hypoxia and Phd2 deficient groups. Red and blue represent relative up-regulation and down-regulation of gene expression, respectively. (F) Correlation in log2FC between hypoxia vs. normoxia mice (X-axis) and Phd2 vs. WT mice (Y-axis) The correlation coefficient (r) and P-value were computed by Pearson correlation test. (G) Gene set score heatmap of the HIF2α-mediated GO biological process terms in WT and Phd2 mice. In total, seven GO terms up-regulated in Phd2 lungs were listed. Red and blue represent relative up-regulation and down-regulation of gene expression, respectively. (H) Comparison of gene set score of the TGF-β signaling pathway between WT and Phd2 mice. (I) Genotyping of WT and Phd2 mice. PC1: positive control 1 (Phd2), PC2: positive control 2 (Tie2-Cre+/–), NC1: negative control 1 (Phd2+/+), NC2: negative control 2 (Tie2-Cre– /–). (J) Relative expression of the PHD2 and HIF2α in mice lung tissues detected by western blotting with β-actin as control (n = 3). Significance levels: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 (t-test).