Literature DB >> 34422087

Tomographic imaging with Compton PET modules: ideal case and first implementation.

P Peng1, M Zhang1, N Zeraatkar1, J Qi1, S R Cherry1.   

Abstract

In our previous studies, we demonstrated that the Compton PET module, a layer structure PET detector with side readout, can provide high performance in terms of spatial/energy/timing resolution, as well as high gamma ray detection efficiency. In this study, we investigate how to translate the high performance of the detector module into good quality reconstructed tomographic images. This study is performed using GATE simulation, as well as with physical experiments. Similar detector geometry is used in the simulation and experiment: two identical 4-layer detector modules are placed with face to face distance of 56 mm. In the simulation study, each layer consists of a 1-mm-pitch pixelated crystal array. In the experimental study, each layer is a monolithic crystal, which is virtually binned into 1 mm2 cells to group single events according to the gamma ray interaction locations. A customized Derenzo phantom was placed between the two detector modules. By rotating the phantom using a motorized rotary stage, data along lines of response (LORs) at different angles were collected for reconstructing the tomographic image. The same reconstruction algorithm was used for both simulation and experimental studies. The results demonstrate that the simulation study could resolve 0.8 mm rods while the experimental study was able to resolve 1.0 mm rods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Compton PET; Derenzo phantom; GATE; Monte Carlo; Reconstruction

Year:  2021        PMID: 34422087      PMCID: PMC8372193          DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/16/04/t04007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Instrum        ISSN: 1748-0221            Impact factor:   1.415


  15 in total

Review 1.  The challenge of detector designs for PET.

Authors:  Thomas K Lewellen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT.

Authors:  S Jan; G Santin; D Strul; S Staelens; K Assié; D Autret; S Avner; R Barbier; M Bardiès; P M Bloomfield; D Brasse; V Breton; P Bruyndonckx; I Buvat; A F Chatziioannou; Y Choi; Y H Chung; C Comtat; D Donnarieix; L Ferrer; S J Glick; C J Groiselle; D Guez; P F Honore; S Kerhoas-Cavata; A S Kirov; V Kohli; M Koole; M Krieguer; D J van der Laan; F Lamare; G Largeron; C Lartizien; D Lazaro; M C Maas; L Maigne; F Mayet; F Melot; C Merheb; E Pennacchio; J Perez; U Pietrzyk; F R Rannou; M Rey; D R Schaart; C R Schmidtlein; L Simon; T Y Song; J M Vieira; D Visvikis; R Van de Walle; E Wieërs; C Morel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Development and evaluation of a LOR-based image reconstruction with 3D system response modeling for a PET insert with dual-layer offset crystal design.

Authors:  Xuezhu Zhang; Greg Stortz; Vesna Sossi; Christopher J Thompson; Fabrice Retière; Piotr Kozlowski; Jonathan D Thiessen; Andrew L Goertzen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  First characterization of a digital SiPM based time-of-flight PET detector with 1 mm spatial resolution.

Authors:  Stefan Seifert; Gerben van der Lei; Herman T van Dam; Dennis R Schaart
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Compton PET: A Simulation Study for a PET Module with Novel Geometry and Machine Learning for Position Decoding.

Authors:  Peng Peng; Martin S Judenhofer; Adam Q Jones; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2018-11-30

6.  Characterization of highly multiplexed monolithic PET / gamma camera detector modules.

Authors:  L A Pierce; S Pedemonte; D DeWitt; L MacDonald; W C J Hunter; K Van Leemput; R Miyaoka
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Compton PET: a layered structure PET detector with high performance.

Authors:  Peng Peng; Martin S Judenhofer; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Resolution Enhancement in PET Reconstruction Using Collimation.

Authors:  Scott D Metzler; Samuel Matej; Joel S Karp
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.679

9.  Improvement of the spatial resolution of the MicroPET R4 scanner by wobbling the bed.

Authors:  Joon Young Suk; Christopher J Thompson; Aleks Labuda; Andrew L Goertzen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Subsecond total-body imaging using ultrasensitive positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Xuezhu Zhang; Simon R Cherry; Zhaoheng Xie; Hongcheng Shi; Ramsey D Badawi; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.