Literature DB >> 34421150

AVERAGE TREATMENT EFFECTS IN THE PRESENCE OF UNKNOWN INTERFERENCE.

Fredrik Sävje1, Peter Aronow1, Michael Hudgens2.   

Abstract

We investigate large-sample properties of treatment effect estimators under unknown interference in randomized experiments. The inferential target is a generalization of the average treatment effect estimand that marginalizes over potential spillover effects. We show that estimators commonly used to estimate treatment effects under no interference are consistent for the generalized estimand for several common experimental designs under limited but otherwise arbitrary and unknown interference. The rates of convergence depend on the rate at which the amount of interference grows and the degree to which it aligns with dependencies in treatment assignment. Importantly for practitioners, the results imply that if one erroneously assumes that units do not interfere in a setting with limited, or even moderate, interference, standard estimators are nevertheless likely to be close to an average treatment effect if the sample is sufficiently large. Conventional confidence statements may, however, not be accurate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  62K99; Primary 62G20; SUTVA; causal effects; causal inference; experiments; secondary 62D99

Year:  2021        PMID: 34421150      PMCID: PMC8372033          DOI: 10.1214/20-aos1973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Stat        ISSN: 0090-5364            Impact factor:   4.028


  11 in total

1.  Estimating causal effects from epidemiological data.

Authors:  Miguel A Hernán; James M Robins
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Toward Causal Inference With Interference.

Authors:  Michael G Hudgens; M Elizabeth Halloran
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.033

3.  Effect partitioning under interference in two-stage randomized vaccine trials.

Authors:  Tyler J Vanderweele; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen
Journal:  Stat Probab Lett       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 0.870

4.  Exact Confidence Intervals in the Presence of Interference.

Authors:  Joseph Rigdon; Michael G Hudgens
Journal:  Stat Probab Lett       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 0.870

5.  On inverse probability-weighted estimators in the presence of interference.

Authors:  L Liu; M G Hudgens; S Becker-Dreps
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.445

6.  Dependent Happenings: A Recent Methodological Review.

Authors:  M Elizabeth Halloran; Michael G Hudgens
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2016-07-28

7.  On causal inference in the presence of interference.

Authors:  Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.021

8.  Large sample randomization inference of causal effects in the presence of interference.

Authors:  Lan Liu; Michael G Hudgens
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 5.033

9.  Inference with interference between units in an fMRI experiment of motor inhibition.

Authors:  Xi Luo; Dylan S Small; Chiang-Shan R Li; Paul R Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 5.033

10.  Causal inference in infectious diseases.

Authors:  M E Halloran; C J Struchiner
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.822

View more
  4 in total

1.  Using social contact data to improve the overall effect estimate of a cluster-randomized influenza vaccination program in Senegal.

Authors:  Gail E Potter; Nicole Bohme Carnegie; Jonathan D Sugimoto; Aldiouma Diallo; John C Victor; Kathleen M Neuzil; M Elizabeth Halloran
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 1.680

2.  A compelling demonstration of why traditional statistical regression models cannot be used to identify risk factors from case data on infectious diseases: a simulation study.

Authors:  Solveig Engebretsen; Gunnar Rø; Birgitte Freiesleben de Blasio
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.612

3.  Assessing intervention effects in a randomized trial within a social network.

Authors:  Shaina J Alexandria; Michael G Hudgens; Allison E Aiello
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 1.701

4.  Assortativity and Bias in Epidemiologic Studies of Contagious Outcomes: A Simulated Example in the Context of Vaccination.

Authors:  Paul N Zivich; Alexander Volfovsky; James Moody; Allison E Aiello
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 5.363

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.