Literature DB >> 26504255

Inference with interference between units in an fMRI experiment of motor inhibition.

Xi Luo1, Dylan S Small1, Chiang-Shan R Li1, Paul R Rosenbaum1.   

Abstract

An experimental unit is an opportunity to randomly apply or withhold a treatment. There is interference between units if the application of the treatment to one unit may also affect other units. In cognitive neuroscience, a common form of experiment presents a sequence of stimuli or requests for cognitive activity at random to each experimental subject and measures biological aspects of brain activity that follow these requests. Each subject is then many experimental units, and interference between units within an experimental subject is likely, in part because the stimuli follow one another quickly and in part because human subjects learn or become experienced or primed or bored as the experiment proceeds. We use a recent fMRI experiment concerned with the inhibition of motor activity to illustrate and further develop recently proposed methodology for inference in the presence of interference. A simulation evaluates the power of competing procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attributable effects; interference between units; placements; randomized experiment

Year:  2012        PMID: 26504255      PMCID: PMC4618394          DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2012.655954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  13 in total

1.  Validity and power in hemodynamic response modeling: a comparison study and a new approach.

Authors:  Martin A Lindquist; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Graphical models, potential outcomes and causal inference: comment on Ramsey, Spirtes and Glymour.

Authors:  Martin A Lindquist; Michael E Sobel
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Cortical and subcortical contributions to Stop signal response inhibition: role of the subthalamic nucleus.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Confidence intervals for uncommon but dramatic responses to treatment.

Authors:  Paul R Rosenbaum
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-04-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  R. A. Fisher (1890--1962): an appreciation.

Authors:  J Neyman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-06-16       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Subcortical processes of motor response inhibition during a stop signal task.

Authors:  Chiang-Shan Ray Li; Peisi Yan; Rajita Sinha; Tien-Wen Lee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Event-related fMRI: characterizing differential responses.

Authors:  K J Friston; P Fletcher; O Josephs; A Holmes; M D Rugg; R Turner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Locally most powerful tests for detecting treatment effects when only a subset of patients can be expected to "respond" to treatment.

Authors:  W J Conover; D S Salsburg
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Alternative hypotheses for the effects of drugs in small-scale clinical studies.

Authors:  D Salsburg
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Functional connectivity delineates distinct roles of the inferior frontal cortex and presupplementary motor area in stop signal inhibition.

Authors:  Jeng-Ren Duann; Jaime S Ide; Xi Luo; Chiang-shan Ray Li
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  8 in total

1.  On inverse probability-weighted estimators in the presence of interference.

Authors:  L Liu; M G Hudgens; S Becker-Dreps
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.445

2.  Interference and Sensitivity Analysis.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen; M Elizabeth Halloran
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.901

3.  A Recipe for inferference: Start with Causal Inference. Add Interference. Mix Well with R.

Authors:  Bradley C Saul; Michael G Hudgens
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 6.440

4.  Causal Inference for fMRI Time Series Data with Systematic Errors of Measurement in a Balanced On/Off Study of Social Evaluative Threat.

Authors:  Michael E Sobel; Martin A Lindquist
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.033

5.  Large sample randomization inference of causal effects in the presence of interference.

Authors:  Lan Liu; Michael G Hudgens
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 5.033

6.  Big Data and Neuroimaging.

Authors:  Yenny Webb-Vargas; Shaojie Chen; Aaron Fisher; Amanda Mejia; Yuting Xu; Ciprian Crainiceanu; Brian Caffo; Martin A Lindquist
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2017-05-22

7.  AVERAGE TREATMENT EFFECTS IN THE PRESENCE OF UNKNOWN INTERFERENCE.

Authors:  Fredrik Sävje; Peter Aronow; Michael Hudgens
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 4.028

8.  Bipartite Causal Inference with Interference.

Authors:  Corwin M Zigler; Georgia Papadogeorgou
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 4.015

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.