Literature DB >> 34417056

Relationship between semen regurgitation and pregnancy rates with intrauterine insemination.

LaTasha B Craig1, Sushila Arya2, Heather R Burks2, Kaitlin Warta3, Christen Jarshaw2, Karl R Hansen2, Jennifer D Peck4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between semen regurgitation and intrauterine insemination (IUI) outcomes. We hypothesized that clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates would be reduced when regurgitation occurred.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: A university-based reproductive endocrinology and infertility clinic. PATIENT(S): Retrospective review of 1,957 IUI cycles performed on 660 patients between July 2007 and May 2012. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome was live birth. Secondary outcomes were positive serum pregnancy result and clinical pregnancy. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a cluster-weighted generalized estimating equations method to estimate modified Poisson regression models with robust standard errors to account for multiple IUI cycles in the same patient. RESULT(S): Live birth rates were similar in IUI cycles with and without regurgitation (6.3% vs. 6.8%, respectively, RR = 0.82, 95% CI [0.53-1.26]). Clinical pregnancy rates in the presence or absence of regurgitation were 10.5% vs. 10.0% (RR = 0.99, 95% CI [0.73-1.35]). Positive serum pregnancy tests after IUI did not differ by regurgitation status (15.0% vs. 15.4%, RR = 0.97, 95% CI [0.75-1.24]). Results were unchanged when adjusted for covariates (age, race and ethnicity, body mass index, duration of infertility, medication, infertility diagnosis, total motile count, and method of sperm preparation). CONCLUSION(S): The presence of regurgitation during the IUI procedure is not related to pregnancy outcome.
Copyright © 2021 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intrauterine insemination; cervical backflow; fecundability; regurgitation; sample backflow

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34417056      PMCID: PMC8627923          DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.07.1183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of intrauterine insemination practices: a 1-year prospective study in seven French assisted reproduction technology centers.

Authors:  Oriana Monraisin; Lucie Chansel-Debordeaux; Alexandra Chiron; Sébastien Floret; Steven Cens; Sylvain Bourrinet; Sophie Paulhac; Clément Jimenez; Jean Parinaud; Roger Leandri
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  A short period of ejaculatory abstinence before intrauterine insemination is associated with higher pregnancy rates.

Authors:  Paul B Marshburn; Mark Alanis; Michelle L Matthews; Rebecca Usadi; Margaret H Papadakis; Susan Kullstam; Bradley S Hurst
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 3.  Semen quality and prediction of IUI success in male subfertility: a systematic review.

Authors:  Willem Ombelet; Nathalie Dhont; Annelies Thijssen; Eugene Bosmans; Thinus Kruger
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 4.  Predictive factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination (IUI): an analysis of 1038 cycles and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Philippe Merviel; Marie Hélène Heraud; Nadège Grenier; Emmanuelle Lourdel; Pierre Sanguinet; Henri Copin
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Predictors of pregnancy and live-birth in couples with unexplained infertility after ovarian stimulation-intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  Karl R Hansen; Amy Linnea W He; Aaron K Styer; Robert A Wild; Samantha Butts; Lawrence Engmann; Michael P Diamond; Richard S Legro; Christos Coutifaris; Ruben Alvero; Randal D Robinson; Peter Casson; Gregory M Christman; Hao Huang; Nanette Santoro; Esther Eisenberg; Heping Zhang
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Ovarian stimulation in infertile women treated with the use of intrauterine insemination: a cohort study from China.

Authors:  Shuo Huang; Rui Wang; Rong Li; Haiyan Wang; Jie Qiao; Ben Willem J Mol
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Effect of sperm morphology and number on success of intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  Ahmed Badawy; Aboubakr Elnashar; Mohamed Eltotongy
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Prognosis factors of pregnancy after intrauterine insemination with the husband's sperm: conclusions of an analysis of 2,019 cycles.

Authors:  Laka Dinelli; Blandine Courbière; Vincent Achard; Elisabeth Jouve; Carole Deveze; Audrey Gnisci; Jean-Marie Grillo; Odile Paulmyer-Lacroix
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Ultrasound-guided artificial insemination: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Olga Ramón; Roberto Matorras; Beatriz Corcóstegui; Arantza Meabe; Jorge Burgos; Antonia Expósito; Lorena Crisol
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Intrauterine insemination performance characteristics and post-processing total motile sperm count in relation to live birth for couples with unexplained infertility in a randomised, multicentre clinical trial.

Authors:  Karl R Hansen; Jennifer D Peck; R Matthew Coward; Robert A Wild; J C Trussell; Stephen A Krawetz; Michael P Diamond; Richard S Legro; Christos Coutifaris; Ruben Alvero; Randal D Robinson; Peter Casson; Gregory M Christman; Nanette Santoro; Heping Zhang
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.353

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Randomised Comparative Study of Standard IUI (sIUI) and Fallopian Tube Sperm Perfusion (FSP) for Clinical Pregnancy.

Authors:  Nahid Farooqui; Bindu Bajaj
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2022-02-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.