| Literature DB >> 34416779 |
Jing Yang1, Lin Xu1,2,3, Xin Yin2,3, Yi Li Zheng3, Hai Peng Zhang2,3, Sheng Jia Xu1, Wei Wang1, Sen Wang4, Chen Yu Zhang3, Ji Zheng Ma1.
Abstract
High-volume training followed by inadequate recovery may cause overtraining. This process may undermine the protective effect of regular exercise on the cardiovascular system and may increase the risk of pathological cardiac remodelling. We evaluated whether chronic overtraining changes cardiac-related microRNA profiles in the left and right ventricles. C57BL/6 mice were divided into the control, normal training, and overtrained by running without inclination, uphill running or downhill running groups. After an 8-week treadmill training protocol, the incremental load test and training volume results showed that the model had been successfully established. The qRT-PCR results showed increased cardiac miR-1, miR-133a, miR-133b, miR-206, miR-208b and miR-499 levels in the left ventricle of the downhill running group compared with the left ventricle of the control group. Similarly, compared with the control group, the downhill running induced increased expression of miR-21, miR-17-3p, and miR-29b in the left ventricle. Unlike the changes in the left ventricle, no difference in the expression of the tested miRNAs was observed in the right ventricle. Briefly, our results indicated that overtraining generally affects key miRNAs in the left ventricle (rather than the right ventricle) and that changes in individual miRNAs may cause either adaptive or maladaptive remodelling with overtraining. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34416779 PMCID: PMC8885328 DOI: 10.1055/a-1539-6702
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Sports Med ISSN: 0172-4622 Impact factor: 3.118
Table 1 Characteristics of the overtraining protocols used in the present study.
| Week | Intensity (% EV) | Duration (min) | Daily sessions | Recovery between sessions (h) | TR (%) OTR | TR (%) OTR/up | TR (%) OTR/down | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60 | 15 | 1 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 | 60 | 30 | 1 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3 | 60 | 45 | 1 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | 60 | 60 | 1 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | 60 | 60 | 1 | 24 | 0 | 14 | -14 | |
| 6 | 70 | 60 | 1 | 24 | 0 | 14 | -14 | |
| 7 | 75 | 75 | 1 | 24 | 0 | 14 | -14 | |
| 8 | 75 | 75 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 14 | -14 | |
TR: Treadmill grade, OTR: OT protocol based on running without inclination, OTR/up: OT protocol based on uphill running, OTR/down: OT protocol based on downhill running.
Table 2 Characteristics of the aerobic training protocol used in the present study.
| Week | Intensity(%EV) | Duration(min) | Daily session | Recovery between sessions(h) | Treadmill grade(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60 | 15 | 1 | 24 | 0 |
| 2 | 60 | 30 | 1 | 24 | 0 |
| 3 | 60 | 45 | 1 | 24 | 0 |
| 4 | 60 | 60 | 1 | 24 | 0 |
| 5 | 60 | 60 | 1 | 24 | 0 |
| 6 | 60 | 60 | 1 | 24 | 0 |
| 7 | 60 | 60 | 1 | 24 | 0 |
| 8 | 60 | 60 | 1 | 24 | 0 |
EV: exhaustion velocity.
Fig. 1Changes in the body weight (g) of all experimental groups (a) . Percent changes in body weight at the end of the 8-week treadmill protocol (b) . The data represent the means±SEMs of n=16. ## Statistically significant (P<0.01) difference compared with the CON group in week 5; @@ statistically significant (P<0.01) difference compared with the CON group in week 6; && statistically significant (P<0.01) difference compared with the CON group in week 7; †† statistically significant (P<0.01) difference compared with the CON group in week 8; ††† statistically significant (P<0.001) difference compared with the CON group in week 8; ****statistically significant (P<0.0001) difference compared with the CON group.
Fig. 2Changes in the exhaustion velocity (m/min) during the ILT at weeks 0, 4 and 8 (a) . The training volume (min) is shown from the sixth to the eighth weeks (b) . Percent alteration (%) in the rotarod test between weeks 4 and 8 (c) . The data represent the means±SEMs of n=16. @ Statistically significant (P<0.05) difference compared with week 0; @@@ statistically significant (P<0.001 ) difference compared with week 0; @@@@ statistically significant (P<0.0001) difference compared with week 0; + statistically significant (P<0 . 05) difference compared with week 4; ++++ statistically significant (P<0.0001) difference compared with week 4; $ statistically significant (P<0.05) difference compared with the CON group at week 4; * statistically significant (P<0.05) difference compared with the first session in week 8; ** statistically significant (P<0.01) difference compared with the first session in week 8; **** statistically significant (P<0.0001) difference compared with the first session in week 8; #### statistically significant (P<0.0001) difference compared with the second session in week 8; †† statistically significant (P<0.05) difference compared with the NT group.
Fig. 3Representative images of H&E staining (200x) of the left ventricular myocardium (a–e) and right ventricular myocardium (f–j) from the five experimental groups. Masson’s trichrome staining (200x) of the left ventricular myocardium (k–o) and right ventricular myocardium (p–t) tissue sections from the five experimental groups. Scale bars represent 50 μm. Quantitative analysis of Masson’s trichrome staining for fibrosis in the left ventricular myocardium (u) . Quantitative analysis of Masson’s trichrome staining for fibrosis in the right ventricular myocardium (v) . The data represent the means±SEMs of n=6. **Statistically significant (P<0.01); ****statistically significant (P<0.0001).
Fig. 4Cardiac expression of miR-1 (a) , miR-133a (b) , miR-133b (c) , miR-206 (d) , miR-208a (e) , miR-208b (f) and miR-499 (g) in the left ventricular myocardium of the five experimental groups. Cardiac expression of miR-1 (h) , miR-133a (i) , miR-133b (j) , miR-206 (k) , miR-208a (l) , miR-208b (m) and miR-499 (n) in the right ventricular myocardium of the five experimental groups. The data represent the means±SEMs of n=16. * Statistically significant (P<0.05); ** statistically significant (P<0.01).
Fig. 5The expression of miR-21 (a) , miR-17–3p (b) , and miR-29b (c) in the left ventricular myocardium of the five experimental groups and miR-21 (d) , miR-17–3p (e) , and miR-29b (f) in the right ventricular myocardium of the five experimental groups. The data represent the means±SEMs of n=16. * Statistically significant (P<0.05); ** statistically significant (P<0.01).