| Literature DB >> 34415118 |
Marta Ribeiro Hentschke1, Ricardo Azambuja1, Victória Campos Dornelles1, Bibiana Cunegatto1, Cristina Hickman2, Rishabh Hariharan2, Isadora Badalotti Telöken1, Catarina Heckmann Petracco1, Fabiana Mariani Wingert1, Alvaro Petracco1, Mariangela Badalotti1.
Abstract
With the growing understanding of in vitro fertilization and reproductive technology, the magnitude of studies related to embryonic evolution has also increased. The optimization of embryo selection is crucial to minimize the risk of multiple pregnancies and to guarantee successful implantation and pregnancy. On the second day of culture, the four-cell embryo can be shaped into different arrangements, such as tetrahedral and planar. Previous studies have shown that mammalian embryos have a tetrahedral shape and that any deviation from this ideal configuration can negatively affect blastocyst development. A few studies have also found that planar embryos would be linked to negative predictors of success for reaching the blastocyst stage and its good quality. Therefore, it seems that tetrahedral should be preferred over planar-shaped embryos for embryonic transfers, but there is still little understanding and evidence about this subject. Thus, the objective of the present paper was to review the available literature on study tendencies to compare tetrahedral and planar-shaped embryos considering their effect on implantation and pregnancy results.Entities:
Keywords: blastocyst development; irregular cleavage; morphokinetics; planar embryos; tetrahedron embryos; time-lapse imaging
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34415118 PMCID: PMC8489823 DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20210034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JBRA Assist Reprod ISSN: 1517-5693